Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chen Lu 0002

dblp:54/3949-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0006-1567-1722ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
6 papers
Mathematical optimization · 47% Computational complexity · 30% Algorithms and data structures · 17%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 18 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
log-concave sampling
2.952024
Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave Sampling · J. ACM 2024
Query lower bounds for log-concave sampling · FOCS 2023
The query complexity of sampling from strongly log-concave distributions in one dimension · COLT 2022
Computational complexity
query complexity
2.032024
Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave Sampling · J. ACM 2024
Query lower bounds for log-concave sampling · FOCS 2023
The query complexity of sampling from strongly log-concave distributions in one dimension · COLT 2022
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
1.532022
The query complexity of sampling from strongly log-concave distributions in one dimension · COLT 2022
Optimal dimension dependence of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm · COLT 2021
Exponential ergodicity of mirror-Langevin diffusions · NeurIPS 2020
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms
sampling
1.422024
Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave Sampling · J. ACM 2024
Query lower bounds for log-concave sampling · FOCS 2023
Computational complexity › lower bounds
sampling lower bounds
1.422024
Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave Sampling · J. ACM 2024
Query lower bounds for log-concave sampling · FOCS 2023
Computational complexity › query complexity
sampling complexity
1.122022
The query complexity of sampling from strongly log-concave distributions in one dimension · COLT 2022
Optimal dimension dependence of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm · COLT 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling
0.922020
Exponential ergodicity of mirror-Langevin diffusions · NeurIPS 2020
SVGD as a kernelized Wasserstein gradient flow of the chi-squared divergence · NeurIPS 2020
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.812024
Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave Sampling · J. ACM 2024
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling
rejection sampling
0.612022
The query complexity of sampling from strongly log-concave distributions in one dimension · COLT 2022
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic first-order methods
langevin algorithm
0.512021
Optimal dimension dependence of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm · COLT 2021
Algorithms and data structures › markov chains
mixing time
0.512021
Optimal dimension dependence of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm · COLT 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
langevin diffusion
0.412020
Exponential ergodicity of mirror-Langevin diffusions · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › particle-based variational inference
stein variational gradient descent
0.412020
SVGD as a kernelized Wasserstein gradient flow of the chi-squared divergence · NeurIPS 2020
Information theory › information measures › divergence measures
chi-squared divergence
0.412020
SVGD as a kernelized Wasserstein gradient flow of the chi-squared divergence · NeurIPS 2020
Mathematical optimization
convergence analysis
0.412020
Exponential ergodicity of mirror-Langevin diffusions · NeurIPS 2020
Information theory › information measures
divergence measures
0.412020
SVGD as a kernelized Wasserstein gradient flow of the chi-squared divergence · NeurIPS 2020
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › gradient-based optimization
gradient flow
0.412020
SVGD as a kernelized Wasserstein gradient flow of the chi-squared divergence · NeurIPS 2020
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
wasserstein gradient flow
0.412020
SVGD as a kernelized Wasserstein gradient flow of the chi-squared divergence · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wishart matrix · 1.4block krylov algorithms · 1.4kernel methods · 0.9query lower bounds · 0.8reduction · 0.7multiscale construction · 0.7rejection sampling · 0.6MCMC · 0.6projection characterization · 0.5langevin diffusion · 0.5wasserstein distance · 0.4optimal transport · 0.4mirror descent · 0.4interior-point method · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave Sampling
abstract
Log-concave sampling has witnessed remarkable algorithmic advances in recent years, but the corresponding problem of proving lower bounds for this task has remained elusive, with lower bounds previously known only in dimension one. In this work, we establish the following query lower bounds: (1) sampling from strongly log-concave and log-smooth distributions in dimension \(d\ge 2\) requires \(\Omega (\log \kappa)\) queries, which is sharp in any constant dimension, and (2) sampling from Gaussians in dimension d (hence also from general log-concave and log-smooth distributions in dimension d ) requires \(\widetilde{\Omega }(\min (\sqrt \kappa \log d, d))\) queries, which is nearly sharp for the class of Gaussians. Here, \(\kappa\) denotes the condition number of the target distribution. Our proofs rely upon (1) a multiscale construction inspired by work on the Kakeya conjecture in geometric measure theory, and (2) a novel reduction that demonstrates that block Krylov algorithms are optimal for this problem, as well as connections to lower bound techniques based on Wishart matrices developed in the matrix-vector query literature.
Sinho Chewi, Jaume de Dios Pont, Jerry Li 0001, Chen Lu 0002, Shyam Narayanan
J. ACM4
2023 Fisher information lower bounds for sampling
abstract
We prove two lower bounds for the complexity of non-log-concave sampling within the framework of Balasubramanian et al. (2022), who introduced the use of Fisher information ($\mathsf{FI}$) bounds as a notion of approximate first-order stationarity in sampling. Our first lower bound shows that averaged Langevin Monte Carlo (LMC) is optimal for the regime of large $\mathsf{FI}$ by reducing the problem of finding stationary points in non-convex optimization to sampling. Our second lower bound shows that in the regime of small $\mathsf{FI}$, obtaining a $\mathsf{FI}$ of at most $\varepsilon^2$ from the target distribution requires $\text{poly}(1/\varepsilon)$ queries, which is surprising as it rules out the existence of high-accuracy algorithms (e.g., algorithms using Metropolis{–}Hastings filters) in this context.
Sinho Chewi, Patrik Gerber, Holden Lee, Chen Lu 0002
ALT4
2023 Query lower bounds for log-concave sampling
abstract
Log-concave sampling has witnessed remarkable algorithmic advances in recent years, but the corresponding problem of proving $\lt$bold$\gt$lower bounds$\lt$/bold$\gt$ for this task has remained elusive, with lower bounds previously known only in dimension one. In this work, we establish the following query lower bounds: (1) sampling from strongly log-concave and log-smooth distributions in dimension $d \geq 2$ requires $\Omega(\log \kappa)$ queries, which is sharp in any constant dimension, and (2) sampling from Gaussians in dimension d (hence also from general logconcave and log-smooth distributions in dimension d) requires $\widetilde{\Omega}(\min (\sqrt{\kappa} \log d, d))$ queries, which is nearly sharp for the class of Gaussians. Here $\kappa$ denotes the condition number of the target distribution. Our proofs rely upon (1) a multiscale construction inspired by work on the Kakeya conjecture in geometric measure theory, and (2) a novel reduction that demonstrates that block Krylov algorithms are optimal for this problem, as well as connections to lower bound techniques based on Wishart matrices developed in the matrix-vector query literature.
Sinho Chewi, Jaume de Dios Pont, Jerry Li 0001, Chen Lu 0002, Shyam Narayanan
FOCS4
2022 Rejection sampling from shape-constrained distributions in sublinear time
abstract
We consider the task of generating exact samples from a target distribution, known up to normalization, over a finite alphabet. The classical algorithm for this task is rejection sampling, and although it has been used in practice for decades, there is surprisingly little study of its fundamental limitations. In this work, we study the query complexity of rejection sampling in a minimax framework for various classes of discrete distributions. Our results provide new algorithms for sampling whose complexity scales sublinearly with the alphabet size. When applied to adversarial bandits, we show that a slight modification of the EXP3 algorithm reduces the per-iteration complexity from O(K) to O(log(K) log(K/\ensuremath{\delta})) with probability 1-\ensuremath{\delta}, where K is the number of arms.
Sinho Chewi, Patrik Gerber, Chen Lu 0002, Thibaut Le Gouic, Philippe Rigollet
AISTATS3
2022 The query complexity of sampling from strongly log-concave distributions in one dimension
abstract
We establish the first tight lower bound of $\Omega(\log\log\kappa)$ on the query complexity of sampling from the class of strongly log-concave and log-smooth distributions with condition number $\kappa$ in one dimension. Whereas existing guarantees for MCMC-based algorithms scale polynomially in $\kappa$, we introduce a novel algorithm based on rejection sampling that closes this doubly exponential gap.
Sinho Chewi, Patrik Gerber, Chen Lu 0002, Thibaut Le Gouic, Philippe Rigollet
COLT3
2021 Optimal dimension dependence of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm
abstract
Conventional wisdom in the sampling literature, backed by a popular diffusion scaling limit, suggests that the mixing time of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm (MALA) scales as O(d^{1/3}), where d is the dimension. However, the diffusion scaling limit requires stringent assumptions on the target distribution and is asymptotic in nature. In contrast, the best known non-asymptotic mixing time bound for MALA on the class of log-smooth and strongly log-concave distributions is O(d). In this work, we establish that the mixing time of MALA on this class of target distributions is \tilde\Theta(d^{1/2}) under a warm start. Our upper bound proof introduces a new technique based on a projection characterization of the Metropolis adjustment which reduces the study of MALA to the well-studied discretization analysis of the Langevin SDE and bypasses direct computation of the acceptance probability.
Sinho Chewi, Chen Lu 0002, Kwangjun Ahn, Thibaut Le Gouic, Philippe Rigollet
COLT2
2020 SVGD as a kernelized Wasserstein gradient flow of the chi-squared divergence
abstract
Stein Variational Gradient Descent (SVGD), a popular sampling algorithm, is often described as the kernelized gradient flow for the Kullback-Leibler divergence in the geometry of optimal transport. We introduce a new perspective on SVGD that instead views SVGD as the kernelized gradient flow of the chi-squared divergence. Motivated by this perspective, we provide a convergence analysis of the chi-squared gradient flow. We also show that our new perspective provides better guidelines for choosing effective kernels for SVGD.
Sinho Chewi, Thibaut Le Gouic, Chen Lu 0002, Tyler Maunu, Philippe Rigollet
NeurIPS3
2020 Exponential ergodicity of mirror-Langevin diffusions
abstract
Motivated by the problem of sampling from ill-conditioned log-concave distributions, we give a clean non-asymptotic convergence analysis of mirror-Langevin diffusions as introduced in Zhang et al. (2020). As a special case of this framework, we propose a class of diffusions called Newton-Langevin diffusions and prove that they converge to stationarity exponentially fast with a rate which not only is dimension-free, but also has no dependence on the target distribution. We give an application of this result to the problem of sampling from the uniform distribution on a convex body using a strategy inspired by interior-point methods. Our general approach follows the recent trend of linking sampling and optimization and highlights the role of the chi-squared divergence. In particular, it yields new results on the convergence of the vanilla Langevin diffusion in Wasserstein distance.
Sinho Chewi, Thibaut Le Gouic, Chen Lu 0002, Tyler Maunu, Philippe Rigollet, Austin J. Stromme
NeurIPS3