Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Clifford B. Miller
dblp:54/5145
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 50% Learning theory · 50% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automata and formal languages · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › inductive inference
grammatical inference |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Extracting and Learning an Unknown Grammar with Recurrent Neural Networks · NIPS 1991 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Extracting and Learning an Unknown Grammar with Recurrent Neural Networks · NIPS 1991 |
Automata and formal languages
grammatical inference |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Extracting and Learning an Unknown Grammar with Recurrent Neural Networks · NIPS 1991 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
recurrent neural network · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | Experimental Comparison of the Effect of Order in Recurrent Neural NetworksabstractThere has been much interest in increasing the computational power of neural networks. In addition there has been much interest in “designing” neural networks better suited to particular problems. Increasing the “order” of the connectivity of a neural network permits both. Though order has played a significant role in feedforward neural networks, its role in dynamically driven recurrent networks is still being understood. This work explores the effect of order in learning grammars. We present an experimental comparison of first order and second order recurrent neural networks, as applied to the task of grammatical inference. We show that for the small grammars studied these two neural net architectures have comparable learning and generalization power, and that both are reasonably capable of extracting the correct finite state automata for the language in question. However, for a larger randomly-generated ten-state grammar, second order networks significantly outperformed the first order networks, both in convergence time and generalization capability. We show that these networks learn faster the more neurons they have (our experiments used up to 10 hidden neurons), but that the solutions found by smaller networks are usually of better quality (in terms of generalization performance after training). Second order nets have the advantage that they converge more quickly to a solution and can find it more reliably than first order nets, but that the second order solutions tend to be of poorer quality than those of the first order if both architectures are trained to the same error tolerance. Despite this, second order nets can more successfully extract finite state machines using heuristic clustering techniques applied to the internal state representations. We speculate that this may be due to restrictions on the ability of first order architecture to fully make use of its internal state representation power and that this may have implications for the performance of the two architectures when scaled up to larger problems. Clifford B. Miller, C. Lee Giles |
Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 1992 | Learning and Extracting Finite State Automata with Second-Order Recurrent Neural NetworksabstractWe show that a recurrent, second-order neural network using a real-time, forward training algorithm readily learns to infer small regular grammars from positive and negative string training samples. We present simulations that show the effect of initial conditions, training set size and order, and neural network architecture. All simulations were performed with random initial weight strengths and usually converge after approximately a hundred epochs of training. We discuss a quantization algorithm for dynamically extracting finite state automata during and after training. For a well-trained neural net, the extracted automata constitute an equivalence class of state machines that are reducible to the minimal machine of the inferred grammar. We then show through simulations that many of the neural net state machines are dynamically stable, that is, they correctly classify many long unseen strings. In addition, some of these extracted automata actually outperform the trained neural network for classification of unseen strings. C. Lee Giles, Clifford B. Miller, Dong Chen 0001, Hsing-Hen Chen, Guo-Zheng Sun, Yee-Chun Lee |
Neural Comput. | 2 |
| 1991 | Extracting and Learning an Unknown Grammar with Recurrent Neural Networks
C. Lee Giles, Clifford B. Miller, Dong Chen 0001, Guo-Zheng Sun, Hsing-Hen Chen, Yee-Chun Lee |
NIPS | 2 |