Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert W. Tkach

dblp:54/7929 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
3 papers
Optical networks · 52% Cellular and mobile networks · 37% Physical-layer communications · 11%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cellular and mobile networks › cellular network performance
capacity limits
0.112012
Capacity Trends and Limits of Optical Communication Networks · Proc. IEEE 2012
Optical networks
optical fiber communication
0.112012
Capacity Trends and Limits of Optical Communication Networks · Proc. IEEE 2012
Physical-layer communications › MIMO
spatial multiplexing
0.012012
Capacity Trends and Limits of Optical Communication Networks · Proc. IEEE 2012
Optical networks › optical switch
optical switch architecture
0.011998
Layered switch architectures for high-capacity optical transport networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1998
Optical networks
WDM networks
0.011998
The MONET New Jersey network demonstration · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

digital signal processing · 0.1testbed demonstration · 0.0analytical modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Capacity Trends and Limits of Optical Communication Networks
abstract
Since the first deployments of fiber-optic communication systems three decades ago, the capacity carried by a single-mode optical fiber has increased by a staggering 10 000 times. Most of the growth occurred in the first two decades with growth slowing to ten times in the last decade. Over the same three decades, network traffic has increased by a much smaller factor of 100, but with most of the growth occurring in the last few years, when data started dominating network traffic. At the current growth rate, the next factor of 100 in network traffic growth will occur within a decade. The large difference in growth rates between the delivered fiber capacity and the traffic demand is expected to create a capacity shortage within a decade. The first part of the paper recounts the history of traffic and capacity growth and extrapolations for the future. The second part looks into the technological challenges of growing the capacity of single-mode fibers by presenting a capacity limit estimate of standard and advanced single-mode optical fibers. The third part presents elementary capacity considerations for transmission over multiple transmission modes and how it compares to a single-mode transmission. Finally, the last part of the paper discusses fibers supporting multiple spatial modes, including multimode and multicore fibers, and the role of digital processing techniques. Spatial multiplexing in fibers is expected to enable system capacity growth to match traffic growth in the next decades.
René-Jean Essiambre, Robert W. Tkach
Proc. IEEE2
1998 The MONET New Jersey network demonstration
abstract
The multiwavelength optical networking (MONET) consortium has demonstrated national-scale optical networking in a multilocation testbed in New Jersey. The demonstration involves transparent optical connections over path lengths as long as 2290 km, through several network elements (NEs) controlled by two interoperating network control and management (NC&M) systems. This paper describes in detail the three constituent testbeds and the experiments.
L. D. Garrett, Richard M. Derosier, Alan H. Gnauck, A. McCormick, Robert W. Tkach, R. S. Vodhanel, J. C. Chiao, John K. Gamelin, C. A. Gibbins, H. Shirokmann, Michael E. Rauch, J. Young, R. E. Wagner, A. Luss, Mari Maeda, Jorge L. Pastor, Michael Post, Chien-Chung Shen, S. J. Wei, Brian J. Wilson 0001, Yukun Tsai, G. K. Chang, Sunita H. Patel, C. L. Allyn, Andrew R. Chraplyvy, J. Judkins, Atul K. Srivastava, James W. Sulhoff, A. M. Vengsarkar, C. Wolf, J. L. Zyskind, A. Chester, B. Comissiong, G. W. Davis, G. Duverney, Neil A. Jackman, A. Jozan, V. Nichols, B. H. Lee, R. Vora, A. F. Yorinks, G. Newsome, P. Bhattacharjya, D. Doherty, John Ellson, C. Hunt, Antonio Rodriguez-Moral, N. V. Srinivasan, W. Kraeft, J. Ippolito
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.5
1998 Layered switch architectures for high-capacity optical transport networks
abstract
We propose and analyze layered switch architectures that possess high design flexibility, greatly reduced switch size, and high expandability. The improvement in loss and crosstalk due to the reduced switch size is also discussed. Theoretical models have been developed to compute the network blocking probability using these architectures. Low blocking probability and high network utilization are achieved because of the capability of communication between layers in adjacent switches. The results show that the proposed layered switch architectures are very attractive for high-capacity optical transport networks.
Lih Y. Lin, Ezhan Karasan, Robert W. Tkach
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.3