Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Madhava Syamlal

dblp:55/1404 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-9450-0609ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 70% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 23% Memory systems · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
High-performance computing › numerical linear algebra › linear solver
iterative linear solvers
0.412020
Fast stencil-code computation on a wafer-scale processor · SC 2020
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems
0.412020
Fast stencil-code computation on a wafer-scale processor · SC 2020
High-performance computing
stencil computation
0.412020
Fast stencil-code computation on a wafer-scale processor · SC 2020
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › multicore design
waferscale processor
0.412020
Fast stencil-code computation on a wafer-scale processor · SC 2020
Memory systems
memory bandwidth
0.112020
Fast stencil-code computation on a wafer-scale processor · SC 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

finite difference · 0.4BiCGStab · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Fast stencil-code computation on a wafer-scale processor
abstract
The performance of CPU-based and GPU-based systems is often low for PDE codes, where large, sparse, and often structured systems of linear equations must be solved. Iterative solvers are limited by data movement, both between caches and memory and between nodes. Here we describe the solution of such systems of equations on the Cerebras Systems CS-1, a wafer-scale processor that has the memory bandwidth and communication latency to perform well. We achieve 0.86 PFLOPS on a single wafer-scale system for the solution by BiCGStab of a linear system arising from a 7-point finite difference stencil on a 600 × 595 × 1536 mesh, achieving about one third of the machine's peak performance. We explain the system, its architecture and programming, and its performance on this problem and related problems. We discuss issues of memory capacity and floating point precision. We outline plans to extend this work towards full applications.
Kamil Rocki, Dirk Van Essendelft, Ilya Sharapov, Robert Schreiber, Michael Morrison, Vladimir Kibardin, Andrey Portnoy, Jean-Francois Dietiker, Madhava Syamlal, Michael James 0002
SC9
2007 Comparison of frameworks for a next-generation multiphase flow solver, MFIX: a group decision-making exercise
abstract
Abstract Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations have emerged as a powerful tool for understanding the multiphase flows that occur in a wide range of engineering applications and natural processes. A multiphase CFD code called Multiphase Flow with Interphase eXchanges (MFIX) has been under development at the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) since the 1980s for modeling the multiphase flows that occur in fossil fuel reactors. CFD codes such as MFIX are equipped with a number of numerical algorithms to solve a large set of coupled partial differential equations over three‐dimensional grids consisting of hundreds of thousands of cells on parallel computers. Currently the next‐generation version of MFIX is under development with the goal of building a multiphase problem‐solving environment (PSE) that would facilitate the simple reuse of modern software components by application scientists. Several open‐source frameworks were evaluated to identify the best‐suited framework for the multiphase PSE. There are many requirements for the multiphase PSE and each of these open‐source frameworks offers functionalities that satisfy the requirements to varying extents. Therefore, matching the requirements and the functionalities is not a simple task and requires a systematic and quantitative decision‐making procedure. We present a multi‐criteria decision‐making approach for determining a major system design decision and demonstrate its application on the framework‐selection problem. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Aytekin Gel, Sreekanth Pannala, Madhava Syamlal, T. J. O'Brien, Esma Senturk Gel
Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp.3