VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Huan Li 0007
dblp:55/2893-7
· DBLP profile ↗
17ranked-venue papers
12as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 14 · 11 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
7 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 94% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 6% | |
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 75% Learning theory · 12% Efficient and distributed learning · 8% |
Topics — the 27 heaviest of 30, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
3.3 | 5 | 2025 | On the O(sqrt(d)/T^(1/4)) Convergence Rate of RMSProp and Its Momentum Extension Measured by l_1 Norm · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 Accelerated Gradient Tracking over Time-varying Graphs for Decentralized Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Restarted Nonconvex Accelerated Gradient Descent: No More Polylogarithmic Factor in the in the O(epsilon^(-7/4)) Complexity · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
2.1 | 3 | 2025 | On the O(√d/K1/4) Convergence Rate of AdamW Measured by ℓ1 Norm · NeurIPS 2025 Adan: Adaptive Nesterov Momentum Algorithm for Faster Optimizing Deep Models · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024 Accelerated First-Order Optimization Algorithms for Machine Learning · Proc. IEEE 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
1.7 | 3 | 2025 | On the O(sqrt(d)/T^(1/4)) Convergence Rate of RMSProp and Its Momentum Extension Measured by l_1 Norm · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 Restarted Nonconvex Accelerated Gradient Descent: No More Polylogarithmic Factor in the in the O(epsilon^(-7/4)) Complexity · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Accelerated Proximal Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Programming · NIPS 2015 |
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
decentralized optimization |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Accelerated Gradient Tracking over Time-varying Graphs for Decentralized Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Variance Reduced EXTRA and DIGing and Their Optimal Acceleration for Strongly Convex Decentralized Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.9 | 3 | 2024 | On the Complexity Analysis of the Primal Solutions for the Accelerated Randomized Dual Coordinate Ascent · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 Fast Proximal Linearized Alternating Direction Method of Multiplier with Parallel Splitting · AAAI 2016 Accelerated Gradient Tracking over Time-varying Graphs for Decentralized Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › gradient-based optimization
adaptive gradient methods |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On the O(sqrt(d)/T^(1/4)) Convergence Rate of RMSProp and Its Momentum Extension Measured by l_1 Norm · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence acceleration |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Adan: Adaptive Nesterov Momentum Algorithm for Faster Optimizing Deep Models · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
temporal graph |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Accelerated Gradient Tracking over Time-varying Graphs for Decentralized Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.7 | 2 | 2022 | Restarted Nonconvex Accelerated Gradient Descent: No More Polylogarithmic Factor in the O(ε-7/4) Complexity · ICML 2022 Accelerated First-Order Optimization Algorithms for Machine Learning · Proc. IEEE 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Optimization-inspired manual architecture design and neural architecture search · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › gradient-based optimization
accelerated gradient methods |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Restarted Nonconvex Accelerated Gradient Descent: No More Polylogarithmic Factor in the in the O(epsilon^(-7/4)) Complexity · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization › critical point analysis
first-order stationary point |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Restarted Nonconvex Accelerated Gradient Descent: No More Polylogarithmic Factor in the in the O(epsilon^(-7/4)) Complexity · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization › gradient descent
accelerated gradient descent |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Restarted Nonconvex Accelerated Gradient Descent: No More Polylogarithmic Factor in the O(ε-7/4) Complexity · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient descent |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Restarted Nonconvex Accelerated Gradient Descent: No More Polylogarithmic Factor in the O(ε-7/4) Complexity · ICML 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
variance reduction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Variance Reduced EXTRA and DIGing and Their Optimal Acceleration for Strongly Convex Decentralized Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convex optimization
stochastic convex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Accelerated First-Order Optimization Algorithms for Machine Learning · Proc. IEEE 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › coordinate descent
dual coordinate ascent |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On the Complexity Analysis of the Primal Solutions for the Accelerated Randomized Dual Coordinate Ascent · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.3 | 2 | 2022 | Variance Reduced EXTRA and DIGing and Their Optimal Acceleration for Strongly Convex Decentralized Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 On the Complexity Analysis of the Primal Solutions for the Accelerated Randomized Dual Coordinate Ascent · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › proximal methods
alternating direction method of multipliers |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Fast Proximal Linearized Alternating Direction Method of Multiplier with Parallel Splitting · AAAI 2016 |
Mathematical optimization › constrained optimization
augmented lagrangian method |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Fast Proximal Linearized Alternating Direction Method of Multiplier with Parallel Splitting · AAAI 2016 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
proximal methods |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Fast Proximal Linearized Alternating Direction Method of Multiplier with Parallel Splitting · AAAI 2016 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
strongly convex optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Accelerated Gradient Tracking over Time-varying Graphs for Decentralized Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › proximal methods › proximal gradient method
accelerated proximal gradient |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Accelerated Proximal Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Programming · NIPS 2015 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
nonsmooth optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Accelerated Proximal Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Programming · NIPS 2015 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › proximal methods
proximal gradient method |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Accelerated Proximal Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Programming · NIPS 2015 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic gradient methods |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Variance Reduced EXTRA and DIGing and Their Optimal Acceleration for Strongly Convex Decentralized Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › regularization
regularized empirical risk minimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | On the Complexity Analysis of the Primal Solutions for the Accelerated Randomized Dual Coordinate Ascent · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
nesterov acceleration · 2.0restart mechanism · 1.2momentum · 0.9l1 norm convergence analysis · 0.9stochastic gradient descent · 0.8multiple consensus · 0.8gradient tracking · 0.8chebyshev acceleration · 0.8adaptive gradient · 0.8optimization-inspired design · 0.7heavy-ball method · 0.7katyusha · 0.6MSDA · 0.6stochastic algorithm · 0.4accelerated gradient method · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | On the O(√d/K1/4) Convergence Rate of AdamW Measured by ℓ1 Norm
Huan Li 0007, Yiming Dong, Zhouchen Lin |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2025 | On the O(sqrt(d)/T^(1/4)) Convergence Rate of RMSProp and Its Momentum Extension Measured by l_1 NormabstractAlthough adaptive gradient methods have been extensively used in deep learning, their convergence rates proved in the literature are all slower than that of SGD, particularly with respect to their dependence on the dimension. This paper considers the classical RMSProp and its momentum extension and establishes the convergence rate of $\frac{1}{T}\sum_{k=1}^TE\left[||\nabla f(\mathbf{x}^k)||_1\right]\leq O(\frac{\sqrt{d}C}{T^{1/4}})$ measured by $\ell_1$ norm without the bounded gradient assumption, where $d$ is the dimension of the optimization variable, $T$ is the iteration number, and $C$ is a constant identical to that appeared in the optimal convergence rate of SGD. Our convergence rate matches the lower bound with respect to all the coefficients except the dimension $d$. Since $||\mathbf{x}||_2\ll ||\mathbf{x}||_1\leq\sqrt{d}||\mathbf{x}||_2$ for problems with extremely large $d$, our convergence rate can be considered to be analogous to the $\frac{1}{T}\sum_{k=1}^TE\left[||\nabla f(\mathbf{x}^k)||_2\right]\leq O(\frac{C}{T^{1/4}})$ rate of SGD in the ideal case of $||\nabla f(\mathbf{x})||_1=\varTheta(\sqrt{d})||\nabla f(\mathbf{x})||_2$. Huan Li 0007, Yiming Dong, Zhouchen Lin |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2024 | Accelerated Gradient Tracking over Time-varying Graphs for Decentralized OptimizationabstractDecentralized optimization over time-varying graphs has been increasingly common in modern machine learning with massive data stored on millions of mobile devices, such as in federated learning. This paper revisits the widely used accelerated gradient tracking and extends it to time-varying graphs. We prove that the practical single loop accelerated gradient tracking needs $O((\frac{\gamma}{1-\sigma_{\gamma}})^2\sqrt{\frac{L}{\epsilon}})$ and $O((\frac{\gamma}{1-\sigma_{\gamma}})^{1.5}\sqrt{\frac{L}{\mu}}\log\frac{1}{\epsilon})$ iterations to reach an $\epsilon$-optimal solution over time-varying graphs when the problems are nonstrongly convex and strongly convex, respectively, where $\gamma$ and $\sigma_{\gamma}$ are two common constants charactering the network connectivity, $L$ and $\mu$ are the smoothness and strong convexity constants, respectively, and one iteration corresponds to one gradient oracle call and one communication round. Our convergence rates improve significantly over the ones of $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon^{5/7}})$ and $O((\frac{L}{\mu})^{5/7}\frac{1}{(1-\sigma)^{1.5}}\log\frac{1}{\epsilon})$, respectively, which were proved in the original literature of accelerated gradient tracking only for static graphs, where $\frac{\gamma}{1-\sigma_{\gamma}}$ equals $\frac{1}{1-\sigma}$ when the network is time-invariant. When combining with a multiple consensus subroutine, the dependence on the network connectivity constants can be further improved to $O(1)$ and $O(\frac{\gamma}{1-\sigma_{\gamma}})$ for the gradient oracle and communication round complexities, respectively. When the network is static, by employing the Chebyshev acceleration, our complexities exactly match the lower bounds without hiding any poly-logarithmic factor for both nonstrongly convex and strongly convex problems. Huan Li 0007, Zhouchen Lin |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2024 | Adan: Adaptive Nesterov Momentum Algorithm for Faster Optimizing Deep ModelsabstractIn deep learning, different kinds of deep networks typically need different optimizers, which have to be chosen after multiple trials, making the training process inefficient. To relieve this issue and consistently improve the model training speed across deep networks, we propose the ADAptive Nesterov momentum algorithm, Adan for short. Adan first reformulates the vanilla Nesterov acceleration to develop a new Nesterov momentum estimation (NME) method, which avoids the extra overhead of computing gradient at the extrapolation point. Then Adan adopts NME to estimate the gradient's first- and second-order moments in adaptive gradient algorithms for convergence acceleration. Besides, we prove that Adan finds an$\epsilon$-approximate first-order stationary point within$\mathcal {O}(\epsilon ^{-3.5})$stochastic gradient complexity on the non-convex stochastic problems (e.g., deep learning problems), matching the best-known lower bound. Extensive experimental results show that Adan consistently surpasses the corresponding SoTA optimizers on vision, language, and RL tasks and sets new SoTAs for many popular networks and frameworks, e.g., ResNet, ConvNext, ViT, Swin, MAE, DETR, GPT-2, Transformer-XL, and BERT. More surprisingly, Adan can use half of the training cost (epochs) of SoTA optimizers to achieve higher or comparable performance on ViT, GPT-2, MAE,etc, and also shows great tolerance to a large range of minibatch size, e.g., from 1 k to 32 k. Xingyu Xie, Pan Zhou 0002, Huan Li 0007, Zhouchen Lin, Shuicheng Yan |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |
| 2023 | Optimization-inspired manual architecture design and neural architecture search
Zhengyang Shen, Huan Li 0007, Zhouchen Lin |
Sci. China Inf. Sci. | 3 |
| 2023 | Restarted Nonconvex Accelerated Gradient Descent: No More Polylogarithmic Factor in the in the O(epsilon^(-7/4)) ComplexityabstractThis paper studies accelerated gradient methods for nonconvex optimization with Lipschitz continuous gradient and Hessian. We propose two simple accelerated gradient methods, restarted accelerated gradient descent (AGD) and restarted heavy ball (HB) method, and establish that our methods achieve an $\epsilon$-approximate first-order stationary point within $O(\epsilon^{-7/4})$ number of gradient evaluations by elementary proofs. Theoretically, our complexity does not hide any polylogarithmic factors, and thus it improves over the best known one by the $O(\log\frac{1}{\epsilon})$ factor. Our algorithms are simple in the sense that they only consist of Nesterov's classical AGD or Polyak's HB iterations, as well as a restart mechanism. They do not invoke negative curvature exploitation or minimization of regularized surrogate functions as the subroutines. In contrast with existing analysis, our elementary proofs use less advanced techniques and do not invoke the analysis of strongly convex AGD or HB. Huan Li 0007, Zhouchen Lin |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2022 | Restarted Nonconvex Accelerated Gradient Descent: No More Polylogarithmic Factor in the O(ε-7/4) ComplexityabstractThis paper studies the accelerated gradient descent for general nonconvex problems under the gradient Lipschitz and Hessian Lipschitz assumptions. We establish that a simple restarted accelerated gradient descent (AGD) finds an $\epsilon$-approximate first-order stationary point in $O(\epsilon^{-7/4})$ gradient computations with simple proofs. Our complexity does not hide any polylogarithmic factors, and thus it improves over the state-of-the-art one by the $O(\log\frac{1}{\epsilon})$ factor. Our simple algorithm only consists of Nesterov’s classical AGD and a restart mechanism, and it does not need the negative curvature exploitation or the optimization of regularized surrogate functions. Technically, our simple proof does not invoke the analysis for the strongly convex AGD, which is crucial to remove the $O(\log\frac{1}{\epsilon})$ factor. Huan Li 0007, Zhouchen Lin |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Variance Reduced EXTRA and DIGing and Their Optimal Acceleration for Strongly Convex Decentralized OptimizationabstractWe study stochastic decentralized optimization for the problem of training machine learning models with large-scale distributed data. We extend the widely used EXTRA and DIGing methods with variance reduction (VR), and propose two methods: VR-EXTRA and VR-DIGing. The proposed VR-EXTRA requires the time of $O((\kappa_s+n)\log\frac{1}{\epsilon})$ stochastic gradient evaluations and $O((\kappa_b+\kappa_c)\log\frac{1}{\epsilon})$ communication rounds to reach precision $\epsilon$, which are the best complexities among the non-accelerated gradient-type methods, where $\kappa_s$ and $\kappa_b$ are the stochastic condition number and batch condition number for strongly convex and smooth problems, respectively, $\kappa_c$ is the condition number of the communication network, and $n$ is the sample size on each distributed node. The proposed VR-DIGing has a little higher communication cost of $O((\kappa_b+\kappa_c^2)\log\frac{1}{\epsilon})$. Our stochastic gradient computation complexities are the same as the ones of single-machine VR methods, such as SAG, SAGA, and SVRG, and our communication complexities keep the same as those of EXTRA and DIGing, respectively. To further speed up the convergence, we also propose the accelerated VR-EXTRA and VR-DIGing with both the optimal $O((\sqrt{n\kappa_s}+n)\log\frac{1}{\epsilon})$ stochastic gradient computation complexity and $O(\sqrt{\kappa_b\kappa_c}\log\frac{1}{\epsilon})$ communication complexity. Our stochastic gradient computation complexity is also the same as the ones of single-machine accelerated VR methods, such as Katyusha, and our communication complexity keeps the same as those of accelerated full batch decentralized methods, such as MSDA. To the best of our knowledge, our accelerated methods are the first to achieve both the optimal stochastic gradient computation complexity and communication complexity in the class of gradient-type methods. Huan Li 0007, Zhouchen Lin, Yongchun Fang |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2020 | On the Complexity Analysis of the Primal Solutions for the Accelerated Randomized Dual Coordinate AscentabstractDual first-order methods are essential techniques for large-scale constrained convex optimization. However, when recovering the primal solutions, we need $T(\epsilon^{-2})$ iterations to achieve an $\epsilon$-optimal primal solution when we apply an algorithm to the non-strongly convex dual problem with $T(\epsilon^{-1})$ iterations to achieve an $\epsilon$-optimal dual solution, where $T(x)$ can be $x$ or $\sqrt{x}$. In this paper, we prove that the iteration complexity of the primal solutions and dual solutions have the same $O\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon}}\right)$ order of magnitude for the accelerated randomized dual coordinate ascent. When the dual function further satisfies the quadratic functional growth condition, by restarting the algorithm at any period, we establish the linear iteration complexity for both the primal solutions and dual solutions even if the condition number is unknown. When applied to the regularized empirical risk minimization problem, we prove the iteration complexity of $O\left(n\log n+\sqrt{\frac{n}{\epsilon}}\right)$ in both primal space and dual space, where $n$ is the number of samples. Our result takes out the $\left(\log \frac{1}{\epsilon}\right)$ factor compared with the methods based on smoothing/regularization or Catalyst reduction. As far as we know, this is the first time that the optimal $O\left(\sqrt{\frac{n}{\epsilon}}\right)$ iteration complexity in the primal space is established for the dual coordinate ascent based stochastic algorithms. We also establish the accelerated linear complexity for some problems with nonsmooth loss, e.g., the least absolute deviation and SVM. Huan Li 0007, Zhouchen Lin |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2020 | Provable accelerated gradient method for nonconvex low rank optimization
Huan Li 0007, Zhouchen Lin |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |
| 2020 | Accelerated First-Order Optimization Algorithms for Machine LearningabstractNumerical optimization serves as one of the pillars of machine learning. To meet the demands of big data applications, lots of efforts have been put on designing theoretically and practically fast algorithms. This article provides a comprehensive survey on accelerated first-order algorithms with a focus on stochastic algorithms. Specifically, this article starts with reviewing the basic accelerated algorithms on deterministic convex optimization, then concentrates on their extensions to stochastic convex optimization, and at last introduces some recent developments on acceleration for nonconvex optimization. Huan Li 0007, Cong Fang 0001, Zhouchen Lin |
Proc. IEEE | 1 |
| 2018 | Construction of Incoherent Dictionaries via Direct Babel Function MinimizationabstractHighly incoherent dictionaries have broad applications in machine learning. Minimizing the mutual coherence is a common intuition to construct incoherent dictionaries in the previous methods. However, as pointed out by Tropp(2004), mutual coherence does not offer a very subtle description and Babel function, as a generalization of mutual coherence, is a more attractive alternative. However, it is much more challenging to optimize. In this work, we minimize the Babel function directly to construct incoherent dictionaries. As far as we know, this is the first work to optimize the Babel function. We propose an augmented Lagrange multiplier based algorithm to solve this nonconvex and nonsmooth problem with the convergence guarantee that every accumulation point is a KKT point. We define a new norm $\|\X\|_{\infty,max_p}$ and propose an efficient method to compute its proximal operation with $O(n^2\mbox{log}n)$ complexity, which dominates the running time of our algorithm, where $max_p$ means the sum of the largest $p$ elements and $n$ is the number of the atoms. Numerical experiments testify to the advantage of our method. Huan Li 0007, Zhouchen Lin |
ACML | 1 |
| 2018 | Optimization Algorithm Inspired Deep Neural Network Structure DesignabstractDeep neural networks have been one of the dominant machine learning approaches in recent years. Several new network structures are proposed and have better performance than the traditional feedforward neural network structure. Representative ones include the skip connection structure in ResNet and the dense connection structure in DenseNet. However, it still lacks a unified guidance for the neural network structure design. In this paper, we propose the hypothesis that the neural network structure design can be inspired by optimization algorithms and a faster optimization algorithm may lead to a better neural network structure. Specifically, we prove that the propagation in the feedforward neural network with the same linear transformation in different layers is equivalent to minimizing some function using the gradient descent algorithm. Based on this observation, we replace the gradient descent algorithm with the heavy ball algorithm and Nesterov’s accelerated gradient descent algorithm, which are faster and inspire us to design new and better network structures. ResNet and DenseNet can be considered as two special cases of our framework. Numerical experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and ImageNet verify the advantage of our optimization algorithm inspired structures over ResNet and DenseNet. Huan Li 0007, Dongmin Chen, Zhouchen Lin |
ACML | 1 |
| 2018 | Optimized projections for compressed sensing via direct mutual coherence minimization
Canyi Lu, Huan Li 0007, Zhouchen Lin |
Signal Process. | 2 |
| 2016 | Fast Proximal Linearized Alternating Direction Method of Multiplier with Parallel SplittingabstractThe Augmented Lagragian Method (ALM) and Alternating Direction Method of Multiplier (ADMM) have been powerful optimization methods for general convex programming subject to linear constraint. We consider the convex problem whose objective consists of a smooth part and a nonsmooth but simple part. We propose the Fast Proximal Augmented Lagragian Method (Fast PALM) which achieves the convergence rate O(1/K2), compared with O(1/K) by the traditional PALM. In order to further reduce the per-iteration complexity and handle the multi-blocks problem, we propose the Fast Proximal ADMM with Parallel Splitting (Fast PL-ADMM-PS) method. It also partially improves the rate related to the smooth part of the objective function. Experimental results on both synthesized and real world data demonstrate that our fast methods significantly improve the previous PALM and ADMM Canyi Lu, Huan Li 0007, Zhouchen Lin, Shuicheng Yan |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2015 | Accelerated Proximal Gradient Methods for Nonconvex ProgrammingabstractNonconvex and nonsmooth problems have recently received considerable attention in signal/image processing, statistics and machine learning. However, solving the nonconvex and nonsmooth optimization problems remains a big challenge. Accelerated proximal gradient (APG) is an excellent method for convex programming. However, it is still unknown whether the usual APG can ensure the convergence to a critical point in nonconvex programming. To address this issue, we introduce a monitor-corrector step and extend APG for general nonconvex and nonsmooth programs. Accordingly, we propose a monotone APG and a non-monotone APG. The latter waives the requirement on monotonic reduction of the objective function and needs less computation in each iteration. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to provide APG-type algorithms for general nonconvex and nonsmooth problems ensuring that every accumulation point is a critical point, and the convergence rates remain $O(1/k^2)$ when the problems are convex, in which k is the number of iterations. Numerical results testify to the advantage of our algorithms in speed. Huan Li 0007, Zhouchen Lin |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2015 | Linearized alternating direction method with parallel splitting and adaptive penalty for separable convex programs in machine learning
Zhouchen Lin, Risheng Liu, Huan Li 0007 |
Mach. Learn. | 3 |