Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lauren B. Doyle

dblp:55/3554 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1965
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 64% Data mining · 36%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › text mining
text classification
0.011965
Is Automatic Classification a Reasonable Application of Statistical Analysis of Text? · J. ACM 1965
Information retrieval › document retrieval
literature search
0.011961
Semantic Road Maps for Literature Searchers · J. ACM 1961
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.021965
Is Automatic Classification a Reasonable Application of Statistical Analysis of Text? · J. ACM 1965
Semantic Road Maps for Literature Searchers · J. ACM 1961
Information retrieval
search engines
0.011961
Semantic Road Maps for Literature Searchers · J. ACM 1961
Information retrieval › retrieval models
semantic representation
0.011961
Semantic Road Maps for Literature Searchers · J. ACM 1961

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical analysis · 0.0semantic road map · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1965 Is Automatic Classification a Reasonable Application of Statistical Analysis of Text?
abstract
The statistical approach to the analysis of document collections and retrieval therefrom has proceeded along two main lines, associative machine searching and automatic classification.The former approach has been favored because of the tendency of people ia the computer field to strive for new methods of dealing with the literature--methods which do not resemble those of traditional libraries.But automatic classification study also has been thriw ing; some of the reasons for this are discussed.The crucial question of the quality of automatic classification is treated at considerable length, and empirical data are introduced to support the hypothesis that classification quality improves as more information about each document is used for input to the classification program.Six nonjudgmental criteria are used in testing the hypothesis for 100 keyword lists (each list representing a document) for a series of computer runs in which the number of words pet" document is increased progressively from 12 to 36.Four of the six criteria indicate the hypothesis holds, and two point to no effect.Previous work of this kind has been confined to the range t~f one through eight words per document.Finally, the future of automatic classification and some of the practical problems to be faced are outlined.
Lauren B. Doyle
J. ACM1
1963 The microstatistics of text
Lauren B. Doyle
Inf. Storage Retr.1
1961 Semantic Road Maps for Literature Searchers
abstract
However, it is noted that there has been a
Lauren B. Doyle
J. ACM1