This extended abstract highlights challenges with imbalanced datasets in real-world applications, where issues like noise, class overlap, and small subsets of data impact classification accuracy. While the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) addresses imbalanced datasets by increasing minority class examples, it struggles with handling these data complexities and might worsen the situation. As a result, several SMOTE variants have emerged, aiming to improve its effectiveness by integrating it with other methods or altering its approach. This paper offers a comparative analysis of these variants, examining how each tackles specific data complexities. Through experiments on 24 imbalanced datasets, changes in complexity measures resulting from these SMOTE variants, in terms of F1-Score and data complexity metrics are observed and demonstrated.

Many binary class datasets in real-life applications are affected by class imbalance problem. Data complexities like noise examples, class overlap and small disjuncts problems are observed to play a key role in producing poor classification performance. These complexities tend to exist in tandem with class imbalance problem. Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) is a well-known method to re-balance the number of examples in imbalanced datasets. However, this technique cannot effectively tackle data complexities and it also has the capability of magnifying the degree of complexities. Also, the performance of the SMOTE is still not satisfactory. Therefore, various SMOTE variants have been proposed to overcome the downsides of SMOTE either by combining SMOTE with other algorithms or modifying the existing SMOTE algorithm. This paper aims to comparatively review the algorithms applied in SMOTE variants and investigate which data complexities are being addressed in what variants. Series of experiments are conducted on 24 binary class imbalanced datasets to observe the changes in the data complexity measures after SMOTE variants were applied in these datasets. The evaluation metrics like G-Mean and F1-Score are also analyzed to investigate the difference in classification performance between SMOTE variants.