Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Diane Lambert

dblp:55/5783 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Data mining · 76% Data stream processing · 24%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities › marketing
advertising effectiveness measurement
0.112010
Evaluating online ad campaigns in a pipeline: causal models at scale · KDD 2010
Data mining
causal inference
0.112010
Evaluating online ad campaigns in a pipeline: causal models at scale · KDD 2010
Data mining › behavior modeling
customer behavior modeling
0.012001
Mining a stream of transactions for customer patterns · KDD 2001
Data mining
pattern mining
0.012001
Mining a stream of transactions for customer patterns · KDD 2001
Data stream processing
quantile estimation
0.012000
Incremental quantile estimation for massive tracking · KDD 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

propensity scoring · 0.2doubly robust estimation · 0.2nonparametric test · 0.1non-parametric tests · 0.1statistical summarization · 0.0signature database · 0.0stochastic approximation · 0.0exponentially weighted moving average · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Randomization and The Pernicious Effects of Limited Budgets on Auction Experiments
abstract
Buyers (e.g., advertisers) often have limited financial or processing resources, and so their participation in auctions is throttled. Changes to auctions may affect bids or throttling, and any change may affect what buyers pay. This paper shows that if an A/B experiment affects only bids, then the observed treatment effect is an unbiased estimator when all the bidders in the same auction are randomly assigned to A or B but the observed treatment effect can be severely biased otherwise, even in the absence of throttling. Experiments that affect throttling algorithms can also be badly biased, but the bias can be much reduced if separate budgets are maintained for the A and B arms of the experiment.
Guillaume W. Basse, Hossein Azari Soufiani, Diane Lambert
AISTATS3
2010 Evaluating online ad campaigns in a pipeline: causal models at scale
abstract
Display ads proliferate on the web, but are they effective? Or are they irrelevant in light of all the other advertising that people see? We describe a way to answer these questions, quickly and accurately, without randomized experiments, surveys, focus groups or expert data analysts. Doubly robust estimation protects against the selection bias that is inherent in observational data, and a nonparametric test that is based on irrelevant outcomes provides further defense. Simulations based on realistic scenarios show that the resulting estimates are more robust to selection bias than traditional alternatives, such as regression modeling or propensity scoring. Moreover, computations are fast enough that all processing, from data retrieval through estimation, testing, validation and report generation, proceeds in an automated pipeline, without anyone needing to see the raw data.
Ori Gershony, Tim Hesterberg, Diane Lambert
KDD5
2001 Mining a stream of transactions for customer patterns
abstract
Transaction data can arrive at a ferocious rate in the order that transactions are completed. The data contain an enormous amount of information about customers, not just transactions, but extracting up-to-date customer information from an ever changing stream of data and mining it in real-time is a challenge. This paper describes a statistically principled approach to designing short, accurate summaries or signatures of high dimensional customer behavior that can be kept current with a stream of transactions. A signature database can then be used for data mining and to provide approximate answers to many kinds of queries about current customers quickly and accurately, as an empirical study of the calling patterns of 96,000 wireless customers who made about 18 million wireless calls over a three month period shows.
Diane Lambert, José C. Pinheiro
KDD1
2000 Incremental quantile estimation for massive tracking
abstract
Data-call records, internet packet headers, or other transaction records-are coming down a pipe at a ferocious rate, and we need to monitor statistics of the data.There is no reason to think that the data are normally distributed, so quantiles of the data are important to watch.The probe attached to the pipe has only limited memory, though, so it is impossible to compute the quantiles by sorting the data.The only possibility is to incrementally estimate the quantiles as the data fly by.This paper provides such an incremental quantile estimator.It resembles an exponentially weighted moving average in form, processing and memory requirements, but it is based on stochastic approximation so we call it an exponentially weighted stochastic approximation or EWSA.Simulations show that the EWSA outperforms other kinds of incremental estimates that also require minimal main memory, especially when extreme quantiles are tracked for patterns of behavior that change over time.Use of the EWSA is illustrated in an application to tracking call duration for a set of callers over a three month period.
Diane Lambert, José C. Pinheiro
KDD2