Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pieter Wuille
dblp:55/7278
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-5530-4541ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 5 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
4 papers |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 53% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 27% Hardware security and side channels · 11% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet architecture and protocols · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptographic implementation
constant-time implementation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Accelerating and verifying constant-time modular inversion · EUROCRYPT (7) 2026 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › finite field arithmetic
modular inversion |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Accelerating and verifying constant-time modular inversion · EUROCRYPT (7) 2026 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
digital signatures |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | MuSig-DN: Schnorr Multi-Signatures with Verifiably Deterministic Nonces · CCS 2020 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › multi-signature
schnorr multi-signatures |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | MuSig-DN: Schnorr Multi-Signatures with Verifiably Deterministic Nonces · CCS 2020 |
Internet architecture and protocols › peer-to-peer networks
peer-to-peer protocols |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Erlay: Efficient Transaction Relay for Bitcoin · CCS 2019 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › electronic cash
bitcoin |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Erlay: Efficient Transaction Relay for Bitcoin · CCS 2019 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems › zero-knowledge proofs
non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and More · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2018 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems › zero-knowledge proofs › zero-knowledge set membership proof
range proof |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and More · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2018 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and More · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2018 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
zero-knowledge proofs |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and More · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2018 |
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel attack |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Accelerating and verifying constant-time modular inversion · EUROCRYPT (7) 2026 |
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack
timing side channel |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Accelerating and verifying constant-time modular inversion · EUROCRYPT (7) 2026 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management
key aggregation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | MuSig-DN: Schnorr Multi-Signatures with Verifiably Deterministic Nonces · CCS 2020 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
confidential transactions |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and More · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
formal verification · 1.0constant-time programming · 1.0derandomization · 0.4discrete logarithm assumption · 0.3arithmetic circuit proof · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Accelerating and verifying constant-time modular inversion
Daniel J. Bernstein, Han-Ting Chen, John Harrison 0001, Cesare Huang, Gregory Maxwell, Bow-Yaw Wang, Pieter Wuille, Bo-Yin Yang |
EUROCRYPT (7) | 7 |
| 2020 | MuSig-DN: Schnorr Multi-Signatures with Verifiably Deterministic NoncesabstractMuSig is a multi-signature scheme for Schnorr signatures, which supports key aggregation and is secure in the plain public key model. Standard derandomization techniques for discrete logarithm-based signatures such as RFC~6979, which make the signing procedure immune to catastrophic failures in the randomness generation, are not applicable to multi-signatures as an attacker could trick an honest user into producing two different partial signatures with the same randomness, which would reveal the user's secret key. Jonas Nick, Tim Ruffing, Yannick Seurin, Pieter Wuille |
CCS | 4 |
| 2019 | Erlay: Efficient Transaction Relay for BitcoinabstractBitcoin is a top-ranked cryptocurrency that has experienced huge growth and survived numerous attacks. The protocols making up Bitcoin must therefore accommodate the growth of the network and ensure security. Gleb Naumenko, Gregory Maxwell, Pieter Wuille, Alexandra Fedorova, Ivan Beschastnikh |
CCS | 3 |
| 2019 | Simple Schnorr multi-signatures with applications to Bitcoin
Gregory Maxwell, Andrew Poelstra, Yannick Seurin, Pieter Wuille |
Des. Codes Cryptogr. | 4 |
| 2018 | Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and MoreabstractWe propose Bulletproofs, a new non-interactive zero-knowledge proof protocol with very short proofs and without a trusted setup; the proof size is only logarithmic in the witness size. Bulletproofs are especially well suited for efficient range proofs on committed values: they enable proving that a committed value is in a range using only 2 log_2(n)+9 group and field elements, where n is the bit length of the range. Proof generation and verification times are linear in n. Bulletproofs greatly improve on the linear (in n) sized range proofs in existing proposals for confidential transactions in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Moreover, Bulletproofs supports aggregation of range proofs, so that a party can prove that m commitments lie in a given range by providing only an additive O(log(m)) group elements over the length of a single proof. To aggregate proofs from multiple parties, we enable the parties to generate a single proof without revealing their inputs to each other via a simple multi-party computation (MPC) protocol for constructing Bulletproofs. This MPC protocol uses either a constant number of rounds and linear communication, or a logarithmic number of rounds and logarithmic communication. We show that verification time, while asymptotically linear, is very efficient in practice. The marginal cost of batch verifying 32 aggregated range proofs is less than the cost of verifying 32 ECDSA signatures. Bulletproofs build on the techniques of Bootle et al. (EUROCRYPT 2016). Beyond range proofs, Bulletproofs provide short zero-knowledge proofs for general arithmetic circuits while only relying on the discrete logarithm assumption and without requiring a trusted setup. We discuss many applications that would benefit from Bulletproofs, primarily in the area of cryptocurrencies. The efficiency of Bulletproofs is particularly well suited for the distributed and trustless nature of blockchains. The full version of this article is available on ePrint. Benedikt Bünz, Jonathan Bootle, Dan Boneh, Andrew Poelstra, Pieter Wuille, Gregory Maxwell |
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy | 5 |
| 2016 | FLIF: Free lossless image format based on MANIAC compressionabstractWe present a novel lossless image compression algorithm. It achieves better compression than popular lossless image formats like PNG and lossless JPEG 2000. Existing image formats have specific strengths and weaknesses: e.g. JPEG works well for photographs, PNG works well for line drawings or images with few distinct colors. For any type of image, our method performs as good or better (on average) than any of the existing image formats for lossless compression. Interlacing is improved compared to PNG, making the format suitable for progressive decoding and responsive web design. Jon Sneyers, Pieter Wuille |
ICIP | 2 |
| 2012 | An Introduction to Search Combinators
Tom Schrijvers, Guido Tack, Pieter Wuille, Horst Samulowitz, Peter J. Stuckey |
LOPSTR | 3 |
| 2011 | Search Combinators
Tom Schrijvers, Guido Tack, Pieter Wuille, Horst Samulowitz, Peter J. Stuckey |
CP | 3 |