Seth Juarez

dblp:55/8399 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Machine translation · 67% Information extraction and text analysis · 33%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › transliteration
machine transliteration
0.112010
Kernelized Sorting for Natural Language Processing · AAAI 2010
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
transliteration
0.112010
Kernelized Sorting for Natural Language Processing · AAAI 2010
Image and video processing
image matching
0.012010
Kernelized Sorting for Natural Language Processing · AAAI 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-supervised learning · 0.2kernelized sorting · 0.2canonical correlation analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Kernelized Sorting for Natural Language Processing
abstract
Kernelized sorting is an approach for matching objects from two sources (or domains) that does not require any prior notion of similarity between objects across the two sources. Unfortunately, this technique is highly sensitive to initialization and high dimensional data. We present variants of kernelized sorting to increase its robustness and performance on several Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks: document matching from parallel and comparable corpora, machine transliteration and even image processing. Empirically we show that, on these tasks, a semi-supervised variant of kernelized sorting outperforms matching canonical correlation analysis.
Jagadeesh Jagarlamudi, Seth Juarez, Hal Daumé III
AAAI2