Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xinwei Zhang 0001

dblp:55/9870-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7967-7150ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 5 first-author · 9 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 43% Efficient and distributed learning · 22% Language models and text generation · 10%
Network and information security
5 papers
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 23 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
3.752025
DiSK: Differentially Private Optimizer with Simplified Kalman Filter for Noise Reduction · ICLR 2025
Pre-training Differentially Private Models with Limited Public Data · NeurIPS 2024
DOPPLER: Differentially Private Optimizers with Low-pass Filter for Privacy Noise Reduction · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis
1.832023
FedAvg Converges to Zero Training Loss Linearly for Overparameterized Multi-Layer Neural Networks · ICML 2023
A Stochastic Multi-Rate Control Framework For Modeling Distributed Optimization Algorithms · ICML 2022
Understanding Clipping for Federated Learning: Convergence and Client-Level Differential Privacy · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
1.832023
FedAvg Converges to Zero Training Loss Linearly for Overparameterized Multi-Layer Neural Networks · ICML 2023
A Stochastic Multi-Rate Control Framework For Modeling Distributed Optimization Algorithms · ICML 2022
Understanding Clipping for Federated Learning: Convergence and Client-Level Differential Privacy · ICML 2022
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private deep learning
DP-SGD
1.522024
DOPPLER: Differentially Private Optimizers with Low-pass Filter for Privacy Noise Reduction · NeurIPS 2024
Differentially Private SGD Without Clipping Bias: An Error-Feedback Approach · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
differentially private training
0.912025
DiSK: Differentially Private Optimizer with Simplified Kalman Filter for Noise Reduction · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning
0.912025
Addax: Utilizing Zeroth-Order Gradients to Improve Memory Efficiency and Performance of SGD for Fine-Tuning Language Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › memory-efficient training
memory-efficient fine-tuning
0.912025
Addax: Utilizing Zeroth-Order Gradients to Improve Memory Efficiency and Performance of SGD for Fine-Tuning Language Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory optimization
0.912025
Addax: Utilizing Zeroth-Order Gradients to Improve Memory Efficiency and Performance of SGD for Fine-Tuning Language Models · ICLR 2025
Privacy and data protection › privacy evaluation
privacy-utility tradeoff
0.912025
DiSK: Differentially Private Optimizer with Simplified Kalman Filter for Noise Reduction · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.812024
Boundary Exploration for Bayesian Optimization With Unknown Physical Constraints · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
black-box optimization
0.812024
Boundary Exploration for Bayesian Optimization With Unknown Physical Constraints · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
constrained bayesian optimization
0.812024
Boundary Exploration for Bayesian Optimization With Unknown Physical Constraints · ICML 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
continual pre-training
0.812024
Pre-training Differentially Private Models with Limited Public Data · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.812024
Boundary Exploration for Bayesian Optimization With Unknown Physical Constraints · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training
0.812024
Pre-training Differentially Private Models with Limited Public Data · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
surrogate model
0.812024
Boundary Exploration for Bayesian Optimization With Unknown Physical Constraints · ICML 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
differentially private optimization
0.812024
DOPPLER: Differentially Private Optimizers with Low-pass Filter for Privacy Noise Reduction · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
overparameterized neural network
0.712023
FedAvg Converges to Zero Training Loss Linearly for Overparameterized Multi-Layer Neural Networks · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
training convergence
0.712023
FedAvg Converges to Zero Training Loss Linearly for Overparameterized Multi-Layer Neural Networks · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
distributed optimization
0.612022
A Stochastic Multi-Rate Control Framework For Modeling Distributed Optimization Algorithms · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model
0.212024
Pre-training Differentially Private Models with Limited Public Data · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
foundation model pretraining
0.212024
DOPPLER: Differentially Private Optimizers with Low-pass Filter for Privacy Noise Reduction · NeurIPS 2024
Distributed systems
distributed coordination
0.212022
A Stochastic Multi-Rate Control Framework For Modeling Distributed Optimization Algorithms · ICML 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gradient clipping · 2.9differential privacy · 2.3noise injection · 1.7kalman filtering · 1.7rényi differential privacy · 1.5error feedback · 1.5zeroth-order optimization · 0.9stochastic gradient descent · 0.9convergence analysis · 0.9signal processing · 0.8low-pass filter · 0.8hessian-based analysis · 0.8acquisition function · 0.8DP-SGD · 0.8stochastic multi-rate feedback control · 0.6gradient tracking · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 DiSK: Differentially Private Optimizer with Simplified Kalman Filter for Noise Reduction
abstract
Differential privacy (DP) offers a robust framework for safeguarding individual data privacy. To utilize DP in training modern machine learning models, differentially private optimizers have been widely used in recent years. A popular approach to privatize an optimizer is to clip the individual gradients and add sufficiently large noise to the clipped gradient. This approach led to the development of DP optimizers that have comparable performance with their non-private counterparts in fine-tuning tasks or in tasks with a small number of training parameters. However, a significant performance drop is observed when these optimizers are applied to large-scale training. This degradation stems from the substantial noise injection required to maintain DP, which disrupts the optimizer's dynamics. This paper introduces DiSK, a novel framework designed to significantly enhance the performance of DP optimizers. DiSK employs Kalman filtering, a technique drawn from control and signal processing, to effectively denoise privatized gradients and generate progressively refined gradient estimations. To ensure practicality for large-scale training, we simplify the Kalman filtering process, minimizing its memory and computational demands. We establish theoretical privacy-utility trade-off guarantees for DiSK, and demonstrate provable improvements over standard DP optimizers like DPSGD in terms of iteration complexity upper-bound. Extensive experiments across diverse tasks, including vision tasks such as CIFAR-100 and ImageNet-1k and language fine-tuning tasks such as GLUE, E2E, and DART, validate the effectiveness of DiSK. The results showcase its ability to significantly improve the performance of DP optimizers, surpassing state-of-the-art results under the same privacy constraints on several benchmarks.
Xinwei Zhang 0001, Zhiqi Bu, Borja Balle, Mingyi Hong 0001, Meisam Razaviyayn, Vahab S. Mirrokni
ICLR1
2025 Addax: Utilizing Zeroth-Order Gradients to Improve Memory Efficiency and Performance of SGD for Fine-Tuning Language Models
abstract
Fine-tuning language models (LMs) with the standard Adam optimizer often demands excessive memory, limiting accessibility. The ``in-place'' version of Stochastic Gradient Descent (IP-SGD) and Memory-Efficient Zeroth-order Optimizer (MeZO) have been proposed as solutions to improve memory efficiency. However, IP-SGD still requires a decent amount of memory, and MeZO suffers from slow convergence and degraded final performance due to its zeroth-order nature. This paper introduces Addax, a novel method that improves both memory efficiency and algorithm performance of IP-SGD by integrating it with MeZO. Specifically, Addax computes the zeroth-order or first-order gradient of the data points in the minibatch based on their memory consumption and combines zeroth- and first-order gradient estimates to obtain the updated direction in each step. By computing the zeroth-order order gradient of data points that require more memory and the first-order gradient of the ones that require less memory, Addax overcomes the slow convergence of MeZO and excessive memory requirement of IP-SGD. Additionally, the zeroth-order gradient acts as a regularizer for the first-order gradient, further enhancing the model's final performance. Theoretically, we establish the convergence of Addax under mild assumptions, demonstrating faster convergence and less restrictive hyper-parameter choices than MeZO. Our extensive experiments with diverse LMs and tasks show that Addax consistently outperforms MeZO in terms of accuracy and convergence speed, while having a comparable memory footprint. In particular, our experiments using one A100 GPU on OPT-13B model reveal that, on average, Addax outperforms MeZO in terms of accuracy/F1 score by 14%, and runs $15\times$ faster, while having a comparable memory footprint to MeZO. In our experiments on the larger OPT-30B model, on average, Addax outperforms MeZO in terms of accuracy/F1 score by >16% and runs $30\times$ faster on a single H100 GPU. Moreover, Addax surpasses the performance of standard fine-tuning approaches, such as IP-SGD and Adam, in most tasks in terms of Accuracy/F1 score with significantly less memory requirement.
Zeman Li, Xinwei Zhang 0001, Peilin Zhong, Meisam Razaviyayn, Vahab S. Mirrokni
ICLR2
2024 Differentially Private SGD Without Clipping Bias: An Error-Feedback Approach
abstract
Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent with Gradient Clipping (DPSGD-GC) is a powerful tool for training deep learning models using sensitive data, providing both a solid theoretical privacy guarantee and high efficiency. However, existing research has shown that DPSGD-GC only converges when using large clipping thresholds that are dependent on problem-specific parameters that are often unknown in practice. Therefore, DPSGD-GC suffers from degraded performance due to the {\it constant} bias introduced by the clipping. In our work, we propose a new error-feedback (EF) DP algorithm as an alternative to DPSGD-GC, which offers a diminishing utility bound without inducing a constant clipping bias. More importantly, it allows for an arbitrary choice of clipping threshold that is independent of the problem. We establish an algorithm-specific DP analysis for our proposed algorithm, providing privacy guarantees based on R{\'e}nyi DP. And we demonstrate that under mild conditions, our algorithm can achieve the same utility bound as DPSGD without gradient clipping. Our empirical results on standard datasets show that the proposed algorithm achieves higher accuracies than DPSGD while maintaining the same level of DP guarantee.
Xinwei Zhang 0001, Zhiqi Bu, Steven Z. Wu, Mingyi Hong 0001
ICLR1
2024 Boundary Exploration for Bayesian Optimization With Unknown Physical Constraints
abstract
Bayesian optimization has been successfully applied to optimize black-box functions where the number of evaluations is severely limited. However, in many real-world applications, it is hard or impossible to know in advance which designs are feasible due to some physical or system limitations. These issues lead to an even more challenging problem of optimizing an unknown function with unknown constraints. In this paper, we observe that in such scenarios optimal solution typically lies on the boundary between feasible and infeasible regions of the design space, making it considerably more difficult than that with interior optima. Inspired by this observation, we propose BE-CBO, a new Bayesian optimization method that efficiently explores the boundary between feasible and infeasible designs. To identify the boundary, we learn the constraints with an ensemble of neural networks that outperform the standard Gaussian Processes for capturing complex boundaries. Our method demonstrates superior performance against state-of-the-art methods through comprehensive experiments on synthetic and real-world benchmarks. Code available at: https://github.com/yunshengtian/BE-CBO
Yunsheng Tian, Ane Zuniga, Xinwei Zhang 0001, Johannes P. Dürholt, Jie Chen 0007, Wojciech Matusik, Mina Konakovic-Lukovic
ICML3
2024 DOPPLER: Differentially Private Optimizers with Low-pass Filter for Privacy Noise Reduction
abstract
Privacy is a growing concern in modern deep-learning systems and applications. Differentially private (DP) training prevents the leakage of sensitive information in the collected training data from the trained machine learning models. DP optimizers, including DP stochastic gradient descent (DPSGD) and its variants, privatize the training procedure by gradient clipping and *DP noise* injection. However, in practice, DP models trained using DPSGD and its variants often suffer from significant model performance degradation. Such degradation prevents the application of DP optimization in many key tasks, such as foundation model pretraining. In this paper, we provide a novel *signal processing perspective* to the design and analysis of DP optimizers. We show that a ''frequency domain'' operation called *low-pass filtering* can be used to effectively reduce the impact of DP noise. More specifically, by defining the ''frequency domain'' for both the gradient and differential privacy (DP) noise, we have developed a new component, called DOPPLER. This component is designed for DP algorithms and works by effectively amplifying the gradient while suppressing DP noise within this frequency domain. As a result, it maintains privacy guarantees and enhances the quality of the DP-protected model. Our experiments show that the proposed DP optimizers with a low-pass filter outperform their counterparts without the filter on various models and datasets. Both theoretical and practical evidence suggest that the DOPPLER is effective in closing the gap between DP and non-DP training.
Xinwei Zhang 0001, Zhiqi Bu, Mingyi Hong 0001, Meisam Razaviyayn
NeurIPS1
2024 Pre-training Differentially Private Models with Limited Public Data
abstract
The superior performance of large foundation models can be attributed to the use of massive amounts of high-quality data. However, such datasets often contain sensitive, private and copyrighted material that requires formal protection. While differential privacy (DP) is a prominent method used to gauge the degree of security provided to large foundation models, its application in large foundation models has been met with limited success because there are often significant performance compromises when applying DP during the pre-training phase. Consequently, DP is more commonly implemented during the model fine-tuning stage, hence not capable of protecting a substantial portion of the data used during the initial pre-training process. In this work, we first provide a theoretical understanding of the efficacy of DP training by analyzing the per-iteration improvement of loss through the lens of the Hessian. We observe that DP optimizers' deceleration can be significantly mitigated by the use of limited public data, and thus propose the DP continual pre-training strategy. Our DP continual pre-training on vision models, using only 10% of public data, have achieved DP accuracy of 41.5% on ImageNet-21k (with epsilon=8) and non-DP accuracy of 55.7% on Places365 and 60.0% on iNaturalist-2021, which are on par with state-of-the-art standard pre-training and outperform existing DP pertained models. Our DP pre-trained models are released in *fastDP* library (https://github.com/awslabs/fast-differential-privacy/releases/tag/v2.1)
Zhiqi Bu, Xinwei Zhang 0001, Sheng Zha, Mingyi Hong 0001, George Karypis
NeurIPS2
2023 FedAvg Converges to Zero Training Loss Linearly for Overparameterized Multi-Layer Neural Networks
abstract
Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed learning paradigm that allows multiple clients to learn a joint model by utilizing privately held data at each client. Significant research efforts have been devoted to develop advanced algorithms that deal with the situation where the data at individual clients have heterogeneous distributions. In this work, we show that data heterogeneity can be dealt from a different perspective. That is, by utilizing a certain overparameterized multi-layer neural network at each client, even the vanilla FedAvg (a.k.a. the Local SGD) algorithm can accurately optimize the training problem: When each client has a neural network with one wide layer of size $N$ (where $N$ is the number of total training samples), followed by layers of smaller widths, FedAvg converges linearly to a solution that achieves (almost) zero training loss, without requiring any assumptions on the clients’ data distributions. To our knowledge, this is the first work that demonstrates such resilience to data heterogeneity for FedAvg when trained on multi-layer neural networks. Our experiments also confirm that, neural networks of large size can achieve better and more stable performance for FL problems.
Bingqing Song, Prashant Khanduri, Xinwei Zhang 0001, Jinfeng Yi, Mingyi Hong 0001
ICML3
2022 Understanding Clipping for Federated Learning: Convergence and Client-Level Differential Privacy
abstract
Providing privacy protection has been one of the primary motivations of Federated Learning (FL). Recently, there has been a line of work on incorporating the formal privacy notion of differential privacy with FL. To guarantee the client-level differential privacy in FL algorithms, the clients’ transmitted model updates have to be clipped before adding privacy noise. Such clipping operation is substantially different from its counterpart of gradient clipping in the centralized differentially private SGD and has not been well-understood. In this paper, we first empirically demonstrate that the clipped FedAvg can perform surprisingly well even with substantial data heterogeneity when training neural networks, which is partly because the clients’ updates become similar for several popular deep architectures. Based on this key observation, we provide the convergence analysis of a differential private (DP) FedAvg algorithm and highlight the relationship between clipping bias and the distribution of the clients’ updates. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that rigorously investigates theoretical and empirical issues regarding the clipping operation in FL algorithms.
Xinwei Zhang 0001, Xiangyi Chen, Mingyi Hong 0001, Steven Z. Wu, Jinfeng Yi
ICML1
2022 A Stochastic Multi-Rate Control Framework For Modeling Distributed Optimization Algorithms
abstract
In modern machine learning systems, distributed algorithms are deployed across applications to ensure data privacy and optimal utilization of computational resources. This work offers a fresh perspective to model, analyze, and design distributed optimization algorithms through the lens of stochastic multi-rate feedback control. We show that a substantial class of distributed algorithms—including popular Gradient Tracking for decentralized learning, and FedPD and Scaffold for federated learning—can be modeled as a certain discrete-time stochastic feedback-control system, possibly with multiple sampling rates. This key observation allows us to develop a generic framework to analyze the convergence of the entire algorithm class. It also enables one to easily add desirable features such as differential privacy guarantees, or to deal with practical settings such as partial agent participation, communication compression, and imperfect communication in algorithm design and analysis.
Xinwei Zhang 0001, Mingyi Hong 0001, Sairaj V. Dhople, Nicola Elia
ICML1