Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kolawole O. Babalola
dblp:56/4403 · also Kola Babalola, Kolawole Oluwole Babalola
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-1384-8433ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
genotype-phenotype association |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Soft windowing application to improve analysis of high-throughput phenotyping data · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phenomics |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Soft windowing application to improve analysis of high-throughput phenotyping data · Bioinform. 2020 |
Image and video processing › image registration
deformable image registration |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Computing Accurate Correspondences across Groups of Images · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2010 |
Image and video processing › image registration
groupwise registration |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Computing Accurate Correspondences across Groups of Images · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2010 |
Image and video processing
image registration |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Computing Accurate Correspondences across Groups of Images · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
soft windowing · 0.4resampling · 0.4statistical shape constraints · 0.1optimization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Soft windowing application to improve analysis of high-throughput phenotyping dataabstractMOTIVATION: High-throughput phenomic projects generate complex data from small treatment and large control groups that increase the power of the analyses but introduce variation over time. A method is needed to utlize a set of temporally local controls that maximizes analytic power while minimizing noise from unspecified environmental factors. RESULTS: Here we introduce 'soft windowing', a methodological approach that selects a window of time that includes the most appropriate controls for analysis. Using phenotype data from the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IMPC), adaptive windows were applied such that control data collected proximally to mutants were assigned the maximal weight, while data collected earlier or later had less weight. We applied this method to IMPC data and compared the results with those obtained from a standard non-windowed approach. Validation was performed using a resampling approach in which we demonstrate a 10% reduction of false positives from 2.5 million analyses. We applied the method to our production analysis pipeline that establishes genotype-phenotype associations by comparing mutant versus control data. We report an increase of 30% in significant P-values, as well as linkage to 106 versus 99 disease models via phenotype overlap with the soft-windowed and non-windowed approaches, respectively, from a set of 2082 mutant mouse lines. Our method is generalizable and can benefit large-scale human phenomic projects such as the UK Biobank and the All of Us resources. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The method is freely available in the R package SmoothWin, available on CRAN http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SmoothWin. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Hamed Haselimashhadi, Jeremy C. Mason, Violeta Muñoz-Fuentes, Federico López 0001, Kolawole O. Babalola, Elif F. Acar, Jacqui White, Ann M. Flenniken, Ruairidh King, Ewan Straiton, John Richard Seavitt, Angelina Gaspero, Arturo Garza, Audrey E. Christianson, Corey L. Reynolds, Denise G. Lanza, Isabel Lorenzo, Jennie R. Green, Juan J. Gallegos, Ritu Bohat, Rodney C. Samaco, Surabi Veeraragavan, Jong Kyoung Kim, Gregor Miller, Helmut Fuchs, Lillian Garrett, Lore Becker, Yeon Kyung Kang, David Clary, Soo Young Cho, Masaru Tamura, Nobuhiko Tanaka, Kyung Dong Soo, Alexandr Bezginov, Ghina Bou About, Marie-France Champy, Laurent Vasseur, Sophie Leblanc, Hamid Meziane, Mohammed Selloum, Patrick T. Reilly, Nadine Spielmann, Holger Maier, Valérie Gailus-Durner, Tania Sorg, Hiroshi Masuya, Yuichi Obata, Jason D. Heaney, Mary E. Dickinson, Wolfgang Wurst, Glauco P. Tocchini-Valentini, Kevin C. Kent Lloyd, Colin McKerlie, Je Kyung Seong, Yann Herault, Martin Hrabé de Angelis, Steve D. M. Brown, Damian Smedley, Paul Flicek, Ann-Marie Mallon, Helen E. Parkinson, Terrence F. Meehan |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2013 | A parts-and-geometry initialiser for 3D non-rigid registration using features derived from spin images
Kolawole O. Babalola, Andrew Gait, Timothy F. Cootes |
Neurocomputing | 1 |
| 2010 | Computing Accurate Correspondences across Groups of ImagesabstractGroupwise image registration algorithms seek to establish dense correspondences between sets of images. Typically, they involve iteratively improving the registration between each image and an evolving mean. A variety of methods have been proposed, which differ in their choice of objective function, representation of deformation field, and optimization methods. Given the complexity of the task, the final accuracy is significantly affected by the choices made for each component. Here, we present a groupwise registration algorithm which can take advantage of the statistics of both the image intensities and the range of shapes across the group to achieve accurate matching. By testing on large sets of images (in both 2D and 3D), we explore the effects of using different image representations and different statistical shape constraints. We demonstrate that careful choice of such representations can lead to significant improvements in overall performance. Timothy F. Cootes, Carole J. Twining, Vladimir S. Petrovic, Kolawole O. Babalola, Christopher J. Taylor 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 4 |
| 2008 | 3D Brain Segmentation Using Active Appearance Models and Local Regressors
Kolawole O. Babalola, Timothy F. Cootes, Carole J. Twining, Vladimir S. Petrovic, Christopher J. Taylor 0001 |
MICCAI (1) | 1 |
| 2008 | Comparison and Evaluation of Segmentation Techniques for Subcortical Structures in Brain MRI
Kolawole O. Babalola, Brian Patenaude, Paul Aljabar, Julia A. Schnabel, David N. Kennedy, William R. Crum, Stephen M. Smith 0001, Timothy F. Cootes, Mark Jenkinson, Daniel Rueckert |
MICCAI (1) | 1 |
| 2008 | Diffeomorphic statistical shape models
Timothy F. Cootes, Carole J. Twining, Kolawole O. Babalola, Christopher J. Taylor 0001 |
Image Vis. Comput. | 3 |
| 2006 | Comparing the Similarity of Statistical Shape Models Using the Bhattacharya Metric
Kolawole O. Babalola, Timothy F. Cootes, Brian Patenaude, Anil Rao, Mark Jenkinson |
MICCAI (1) | 1 |
| 2003 | An Investigation of Morphometric Changes in the Lateral Ventricles of Schizophrenic Subjects
Kolawole O. Babalola, Jim Graham, William Honer, Lili Kopala, Donna Lang, Robert Vandorpe |
MICCAI (2) | 1 |