Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Georg Kalus

dblp:56/7923 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › software process
software process tailoring
0.112011
Design and validation of feature-based process model tailoring: a sample implementation of PDE · SIGSOFT FSE 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

feature modeling · 0.1domain-specific language · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 The Process Enactment Tool Framework - Transformation of software process models to prepare enactment
Marco Kuhrmann, Georg Kalus, Manuel Then
Sci. Comput. Program.2
2013 Criteria for software process tailoring: a systematic review
abstract
Independently from which software process was selected for a company or a project, the selected software process usually cannot be applied without any customization. Although the need to tailor a software process to specific project requirements seems to be widely accepted and unquestioned, the way of doing the tailoring remains unclear and is, therefore, often left to the expertise of process engineers or project managers. What are the criteria to be applied in the tailoring? What are dependencies between different criteria and how should certain criteria influence the software process? In this paper we investigate concrete tailoring criteria for the tailoring of software processes. To this end, we present a collection of 49 tailoring criteria as the outcomes of a systematic literature review. We further analyze the impact of the discovered tailoring criteria by relating them to a set of 20 exemplary tailoring actions, which affect the project-specific software process. Our outcomes show that the factors influencing the tailoring are well understood, however, the consequences of the criteria remain abstract and need to be interpreted on a project-per-project basis.
Georg Kalus, Marco Kuhrmann
ICSSP1
2011 Design and validation of feature-based process model tailoring: a sample implementation of PDE
abstract
A comprehensive software development process needs some adjustment before it can be used: It needs to be tailored to the particular organization's and project's setting. The definition of an appropriate tailoring model is a critical task. Process users need tailoring that enables them to trim the process to reflect the actual needs. Process engineers need a method and a tool to define a valid model. The SE Book of T-Systems contains a feature model to describe variable parts of the process model and relations and constraints between these parts. The notation and semantics of feature models can be used to visually author a consistent and valid tailoring model. In this paper we present a tool for visual modeling and validation of process model tailoring based on feature models using the SE Book of T-Systems as an example. The tool is based on a domain-specific language that represents the process model. It leverages the semantics of feature models to provide an easy-to-use editor for tailoring-enabled process models.
Daniela Costache, Georg Kalus, Marco Kuhrmann
SIGSOFT FSE2