Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yiyang Liu 0003
dblp:56/8664-3
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-8284-9590ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Vision and language · 48% Efficient and distributed learning · 23% Robot manipulation · 13% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | All You Need is One: Capsule Prompt Tuning with a Single Vector · NeurIPS 2025 Re-Imagining Multimodal Instruction Tuning: A Representation View · ICLR 2025 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › embodied foundation models
vision-language-action model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | On-the-Fly VLA Adaptation via Test-Time Reinforcement Learning · ACL (1) 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › multimodal large language model
multimodal instruction tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Re-Imagining Multimodal Instruction Tuning: A Representation View · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Re-Imagining Multimodal Instruction Tuning: A Representation View · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
prompt learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | All You Need is One: Capsule Prompt Tuning with a Single Vector · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompt tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | All You Need is One: Capsule Prompt Tuning with a Single Vector · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal prompt learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | M²PT: Multimodal Prompt Tuning for Zero-shot Instruction Learning · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy adaptation |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | On-the-Fly VLA Adaptation via Test-Time Reinforcement Learning · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised fine-tuning · 1.0reinforcement learning · 1.0representation editing · 0.9capsule prompt · 0.9attention anchor · 0.9prompt tuning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | On-the-Fly VLA Adaptation via Test-Time Reinforcement LearningabstractVision-Language-Action models have recently emerged as a powerful paradigm for general-purpose robot learning, enabling agents to map visual observations and natural-language instructions into executable robotic actions. Though popular, they are primarily trained via supervised fine-tuning or training-time reinforcement learning, requiring explicit fine-tuning phases, human interventions, or controlled data collection. Consequently, existing methods remain unsuitable for challenging simulated- or physical-world deployments, where robots must respond autonomously and flexibly to evolving environments. To address this limitation, we introduce a Test-Time Reinforcement Learning for VLAs (TT-VLA), a framework that enables on-the-fly policy adaptation during inference. TT-VLA formulates a dense reward mechanism that leverages step-by-step task-progress signals to refine action policies during test time while preserving the SFT/RL-trained priors, making it an effective supplement to current VLA models. Empirical results show that our approach enhances overall adaptability, stability, and task success in dynamic, previously unseen scenarios under simulated and real-world settings. We believe TT-VLA offers a principled step toward self-improving, deployment-ready VLAs. Changyu Liu, Yiyang Liu 0003, Taowen Wang, Qiao Zhuang, James Liang, Renjing Xu, Qifan Wang 0001, Dongfang Liu, Cheng Han 0001 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | Re-Imagining Multimodal Instruction Tuning: A Representation ViewabstractMultimodal instruction tuning has proven to be an effective strategy for achieving zero-shot generalization by fine-tuning pre-trained Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) with instruction-following data. However, as the scale of LMMs continues to grow, fully fine-tuning these models has become highly parameter-intensive. Although Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods have been introduced to reduce the number of tunable parameters, a significant performance gap remains compared to full fine-tuning. Furthermore, existing PEFT approaches are often highly parameterized, making them difficult to interpret and control. In light of this, we introduce Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT), a novel approach that focuses on directly editing semantically rich multimodal representations to achieve strong performance and provide intuitive control over LMMs. Empirical results show that our method surpasses current state-of-the-art baselines with significant performance gains (e.g., 1580.40 MME score) while requiring substantially fewer tunable parameters (e.g., 0.03% parameters). Additionally, we conduct experiments on editing instrumental tokens within multimodal representations, demonstrating that direct manipulation of these representations enables simple yet effective control over network behavior. Yiyang Liu 0003, James Liang, Ruixiang Tang, Yugyung Lee, Majid Rabbani, Sohail A. Dianat, Raghuveer M. Rao, Lifu Huang, Dongfang Liu, Qifan Wang 0001, Cheng Han 0001 |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | All You Need is One: Capsule Prompt Tuning with a Single VectorabstractPrompt-based learning has emerged as a parameter-efficient finetuning (PEFT) approach to facilitate Large Language Model (LLM) adaptation to downstream tasks by conditioning generation with task-aware guidance. Despite its successes, current prompt-based learning methods heavily rely on laborious grid searching for optimal prompt length and typically require considerable number of prompts, introducing additional computational burden. Worse yet, our pioneer findings indicate that the task-aware prompt design is inherently limited by its absence of instance-aware information, leading to a subtle attention interplay with the input sequence. In contrast, simply incorporating instance-aware information as a part of the guidance can enhance the prompt-tuned model performance without additional fine-tuning. Moreover, we find an interesting phenomenon, namely "attention anchor", that incorporating instance-aware tokens at the earliest position of the sequence can successfully preserve strong attention to critical structural information and exhibit more active attention interaction with all input tokens. In light of our observation, we introduce Capsule Prompt-Tuning (CaPT), an efficient and effective solution that leverages off-the-shelf, informative instance semantics into prompt-based learning. Our approach innovatively integrates both instance-aware and task-aware information in a nearly parameter-free manner (i.e., one single capsule prompt).
Empirical results demonstrate that our method can exhibit superior performance across various language tasks (e.g., 84.03\% average accuracy on T5-Large), serving as an "attention anchor," while enjoying high parameter efficiency (e.g., 0.003\% of model parameters on Llama3.2-1B). Yiyang Liu 0003, James Liang, Heng Fan 0001, Yiming Cui 0002, Lifu Huang, Dongfang Liu, Qifan Wang 0001, Cheng Han 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | M²PT: Multimodal Prompt Tuning for Zero-shot Instruction LearningabstractTaowen Wang, Yiyang Liu, James Chenhao Liang, Junhan Zhao, Yiming Cui, Yuning Mao, Shaoliang Nie, Jiahao Liu, Fuli Feng, Zenglin Xu, Cheng Han, Lifu Huang, Qifan Wang, Dongfang Liu. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024. Taowen Wang, Yiyang Liu 0003, James Liang, Junhan Zhao, Yiming Cui 0002, Yuning Mao, Shaoliang Nie, Fuli Feng, Zenglin Xu, Cheng Han 0001, Lifu Huang, Qifan Wang 0001, Dongfang Liu |
EMNLP | 2 |