Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kamel Toubache
dblp:57/133
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 87% Empirical software engineering · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
software process |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | A Comprehensive Process Model for Studying Software Process Papers · ICSE 1993 |
Requirements engineering and software design › software process
software process modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | A Comprehensive Process Model for Studying Software Process Papers · ICSE 1993 |
Empirical software engineering
systematic literature review |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | A Comprehensive Process Model for Studying Software Process Papers · ICSE 1993 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | A Comprehensive Process Model for Studying Software Process Papers
Rudolf K. Keller, Richard Lajoie, Nazim H. Madhavji, Tilmann F. W. Bruckhaus, Kamel Toubache, Won-Kook Hong, Khaled El Emam |
ICSE | 5 |
| 1992 | A framework for process maintenance [software]abstractThe authors present a framework, called the process cycle, which can assist in supporting and controlling process maintenance. The process cycle incorporates engineering management, performance, and improvement of processes by human agents subjected to desirable goals and policy constraints. Process maintenance is supported by incorporating feedback cycles so that processes, goals, and policies can be assessed and improved. In particular the authors address the identification of the reasons why processes change, the overall process change process, and the issue of policy improvement. Furthermore, they assess the applicability of the process cycle framework by relating it to current process maintenance practices. It is pointed out that an implication of using the process cycle for process maintenance is that there is a clear logical separation of concern in the various roles played by people, tools used, activities carried out, goals, and policies specified.> Nazim H. Madhavji, Kamel Toubache, Won-Kook Hong |
ICSM | 2 |