Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James C. Mullikin

dblp:57/4225 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0003-0825-3750ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.212013
Shimmer: detection of genetic alterations in tumors using next-generation sequence data · Bioinform. 2013
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
tumor heterogeneity
0.212013
Shimmer: detection of genetic alterations in tumors using next-generation sequence data · Bioinform. 2013
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequence variation analysis
0.112012
VarSifter: Visualizing and analyzing exome-scale sequence variation data on a desktop computer · Bioinform. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical hypothesis testing · 0.2multiple testing correction · 0.2query framework · 0.1graphical user interface · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 QoRTs: a comprehensive toolset for quality control and data processing of RNA-Seq experiments
abstract
BACKGROUND: High-throughput next-generation RNA sequencing has matured into a viable and powerful method for detecting variations in transcript expression and regulation. Proactive quality control is of critical importance as unanticipated biases, artifacts, or errors can potentially drive false associations and lead to flawed results. RESULTS: We have developed the Quality of RNA-Seq Toolset, or QoRTs, a comprehensive, multifunction toolset that assists in quality control and data processing of high-throughput RNA sequencing data. CONCLUSIONS: QoRTs generates an unmatched variety of quality control metrics, and can provide cross-comparisons of replicates contrasted by batch, biological sample, or experimental condition, revealing any outliers and/or systematic issues that could drive false associations or otherwise compromise downstream analyses. In addition, QoRTs simultaneously replaces the functionality of numerous other data-processing tools, and can quickly and efficiently generate quality control metrics, coverage counts (for genes, exons, and known/novel splice-junctions), and browser tracks. These functions can all be carried out as part of a single unified data-processing/quality control run, greatly reducing both the complexity and the total runtime of the analysis pipeline. The software, source code, and documentation are available online at http://hartleys.github.io/QoRTs.
Stephen Hartley, James C. Mullikin
BMC Bioinform.2
2015 Evaluation of variant detection software for pooled next-generation sequence data
abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the tremendous drop in the cost of nucleotide sequencing in recent years, many research projects still utilize sequencing of pools containing multiple samples for the detection of sequence variants as a cost saving measure. Various software tools exist to analyze these pooled sequence data, yet little has been reported on the relative accuracy and ease of use of these different programs. RESULTS: In this manuscript we evaluate five different variant detection programs-The Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK), CRISP, LoFreq, VarScan, and SNVer-with regard to their ability to detect variants in synthetically pooled Illumina sequencing data, by creating simulated pooled binary alignment/map (BAM) files using single-sample sequencing data from varying numbers of previously characterized samples at varying depths of coverage per sample. We report the overall runtimes and memory usage of each program, as well as each program's sensitivity and specificity to detect known true variants. CONCLUSIONS: GATK, CRISP, and LoFreq all gave balanced accuracy of 80% or greater for datasets with varying per-sample depth of coverage and numbers of samples per pool. VarScan and SNVer generally had balanced accuracy lower than 80%. CRISP and LoFreq required up to four times less computational time and up to ten times less physical memory than GATK did, and without filtering, gave results with the highest sensitivity. VarScan and SNVer had generally lower false positive rates, but also significantly lower sensitivity than the other three programs.
Howard Huang, James C. Mullikin, Nancy F. Hansen
BMC Bioinform.2
2013 Shimmer: detection of genetic alterations in tumors using next-generation sequence data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Extensive DNA sequencing of tumor and matched normal samples using exome and whole-genome sequencing technologies has enabled the discovery of recurrent genetic alterations in cancer cells, but variability in stromal contamination and subclonal heterogeneity still present a severe challenge to available detection algorithms. RESULTS: Here, we describe publicly available software, Shimmer, which accurately detects somatic single-nucleotide variants using statistical hypothesis testing with multiple testing correction. This program produces somatic single-nucleotide variant predictions with significantly higher sensitivity and accuracy than other available software when run on highly contaminated or heterogeneous samples, and it gives comparable sensitivity and accuracy when run on samples of high purity. AVAILABILITY: http://www.github.com/nhansen/Shimmer
Nancy F. Hansen, Jared J. Gartner, Lan Mei, Yardena Samuels, James C. Mullikin
Bioinform.5
2012 VarSifter: Visualizing and analyzing exome-scale sequence variation data on a desktop computer
abstract
UNLABELLED: VarSifter is a graphical software tool for desktop computers that allows investigators of varying computational skills to easily and quickly sort, filter, and sift through sequence variation data. A variety of filters and a custom query framework allow filtering based on any combination of sample and annotation information. By simplifying visualization and analyses of exome-scale sequence variation data, this program will help bring the power and promise of massively-parallel DNA sequencing to a broader group of researchers. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: VarSifter is written in Java, and is freely available in source and binary versions, along with a User Guide, at http://research.nhgri.nih.gov/software/VarSifter/.
Jamie K. Teer, Eric D. Green, James C. Mullikin, Leslie G. Biesecker
Bioinform.3
1992 Boundary description and measurement with sub-pixel/-voxel accuracy
abstract
A sub-image element (imel) model is developed for boundary-based measurements. Using Laplacian-Of-Gaussian operators in combination with a facet model, boundary points in an image are detected with sub-imel accuracy. A boundary trace of these points is inferred using the methods of curvature consistency. From the boundary trace, separate boundaries are identified and analyzed. Types of measurements extracted include whether a boundary is open or closed, its length (area in 3-D), average curvature and bending energy. For display, boundaries are modeled with Bezier curves/surfaces and plotted/rendered with graphics tools. This method is also designed to directly process anisotropically sampled images.>
James C. Mullikin
ICPR (3)1
1992 The vector distance transform in two and three dimensions
James C. Mullikin
CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process.1