Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Davide Molteni
dblp:57/4459
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
3 papers |
Wireless networking · 37% Wireless sensing and localization · 33% Internet of things and sensor networks · 30% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wireless networking › wireless testbed
large-scale testbed |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Cloves: A Large-Scale Ultra-Wideband Testbed · SenSys 2022 |
Wireless sensing and localization › indoor localization
ultra-wideband localization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Cloves: A Large-Scale Ultra-Wideband Testbed · SenSys 2022 |
Wireless networking
wireless testbed |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Cloves: A Large-Scale Ultra-Wideband Testbed · SenSys 2022 |
Wireless sensing and localization
ranging |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Dual-radio discovery and ranging for infrastructure-less social distancing with Janus: poster abstract · SenSys 2020 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › environmental sensing
wildlife monitoring |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Geo-referenced proximity detection of wildlife with WildScope: design and characterization · IPSN 2015 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Geo-referenced proximity detection of wildlife with WildScope: design and characterization · IPSN 2015 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › energy efficiency
energy-accuracy tradeoff |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Geo-referenced proximity detection of wildlife with WildScope: design and characterization · IPSN 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ultra-wideband radios · 0.6dual-radio protocol · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Cloves: A Large-Scale Ultra-Wideband TestbedabstractResearch advances in low-power wireless systems have greatly benefited from the availability of public testbeds. However, none is currently available for the increasingly popular ultra-wideband (UWB) radios enabling communication and localization. We present Cloves, the first public large-scale testbed supporting UWB. Davide Molteni, Gian Pietro Picco, Matteo Trobinger, Davide Vecchia |
SenSys | 1 |
| 2020 | Dual-radio discovery and ranging for infrastructure-less social distancing with Janus: poster abstractabstractDevices to support social distancing must be energy-efficient and accurate. Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) meets the first criteria but falls short on the latter. Ultra-wideband (UWB) measures distances with <10 cm error but with relatively high consumption. Therefore, we built Janus, a dual-radio protocol that uses the strengths of each. Timofei Istomin, Elia Leoni, Davide Molteni, Amy L. Murphy, Gian Pietro Picco |
SenSys | 3 |
| 2017 | LoRa from the City to the Mountains: Exploration of Hardware and Environmental Factors
Oana Iova, Amy L. Murphy, Gian Pietro Picco, Lorenzo Ghiro, Davide Molteni, Federico Ossi, Francesca Cagnacci |
EWSN | 5 |
| 2015 | Geo-referenced proximity detection of wildlife with WildScope: design and characterizationabstractExisting systems for wildlife monitoring focus either on acquiring the location of animals via GPS or detecting their proximity via wireless communication; the integration of the two, remarkably increasing the biological value of the data gathered, is hitherto unexplored. We offer this integration as our first contribution, embodied by our WildScope system whose key functionality is geo-referenced proximity detection of an animal to others or to landmarks. However, to be truly useful to biologists, the in-field monitoring system must be complemented by two key elements, largely neglected by the literature and constituting our other contributions: i) a model exposing the tradeoffs between accuracy and lifetime, enabling biologists to determine the configuration best suited to their needs, a task complicated by the rich set of on-board devices (GPS, low-power radio, GSM modem) whose activation depends strongly on the biological questions and target species at hand; ii) a validation in controlled experiments that, by eliciting the relationship between proximity detection, the distance at which it reliably occurs, and the location acquisition, provides the cornerstone for the biologists' analysis of wildlife behavior. We test WildScope in real-world experimental setups and deployments with different degrees of control, ascertaining the platform accuracy w.r.t. ground truth and comparing against a commercial proximity logger. Gian Pietro Picco, Davide Molteni, Amy L. Murphy, Federico Ossi, Francesca Cagnacci, Michele Corrà, Sandro Nicoloso |
IPSN | 2 |