Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew J. Tritt

dblp:57/9422 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-1617-449XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly › genome assembly
assembly quality assessment
0.112011
Mauve Assembly Metrics · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
genome assembly
0.112011
Mauve Assembly Metrics · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.112011
Mauve Assembly Metrics · Bioinform. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reference-based evaluation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 HDMF: Hierarchical Data Modeling Framework for Modern Science Data Standards
abstract
A ubiquitous problem in aggregating data across different experimental and observational data sources is a lack of software infrastructure that enables flexible and extensible standardization of data and metadata. To address this challenge, we developed HDMF, a hierarchical data modeling framework for modern science data standards. With HDMF, we separate the process of data standardization into three main components: (1) data modeling and specification, (2) data I/O and storage, and (3) data interaction and data APIs. To enable standards to support the complex requirements and varying use cases throughout the data life cycle, HDMF provides object mapping infrastructure to insulate and integrate these various components. This approach supports the flexible development of data standards and extensions, optimized storage backends, and data APIs, while allowing the other components of the data standards ecosystem to remain stable. To meet the demands of modern, large-scale science data, HDMF provides advanced data I/O functionality for iterative data write, lazy data load, and parallel I/O. It also supports optimization of data storage via support for chunking, compression, linking, and modular data storage. We demonstrate the application of HDMF in practice to design NWB 2.0 [13], a modern data standard for collaborative science across the neurophysiology community.
Andrew J. Tritt, Oliver Rübel, Benjamin K. Dichter, Ryan Ly, Donghe Kang, Edward F. Chang, Loren M. Frank, Kristofer E. Bouchard
IEEE BigData1
2011 Mauve Assembly Metrics
abstract
SUMMARY: High-throughput DNA sequencing technologies have spurred the development of numerous novel methods for genome assembly. With few exceptions, these algorithms are heuristic and require one or more parameters to be manually set by the user. One approach to parameter tuning involves assembling data from an organism with an available high-quality reference genome, and measuring assembly accuracy using some metrics. We developed a system to measure assembly quality under several scoring metrics, and to compare assembly quality across a variety of assemblers, sequence data types, and parameter choices. When used in conjunction with training data such as a high-quality reference genome and sequence reads from the same organism, our program can be used to manually identify an optimal sequencing and assembly strategy for de novo sequencing of related organisms. AVAILABILITY: GPL source code and a usage tutorial is at http://ngopt.googlecode.com CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data is available at Bioinformatics online.
Aaron E. Darling, Andrew J. Tritt, Jonathan A. Eisen, Marc T. Facciotti
Bioinform.2