Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Widodo Sulistyono

dblp:58/3593 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Embedded and real-time systems · 61% Cloud and datacenter computing · 20% Distributed systems · 20%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems › discrete event systems
supervisory control
0.122002
Robust Supervisory Control for Manufacturing Systems with Unreliable Resources · ICRA 2002
Deadlock Avoidance for Manufacturing Systems with Partially Ordered Process Plans · ICRA 2000
Embedded and real-time systems
discrete event systems
0.022002
Deadlock Avoidance for Manufacturing Systems with Partially Ordered Process Plans · ICRA 2000
Robust Supervisory Control for Manufacturing Systems with Unreliable Resources · ICRA 2002
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.012002
Robust Supervisory Control for Manufacturing Systems with Unreliable Resources · ICRA 2002
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource management › shared resource management
deadlock avoidance
0.012000
Deadlock Avoidance for Manufacturing Systems with Partially Ordered Process Plans · ICRA 2000
Embedded and real-time systems › discrete event systems
liveness enforcement
0.012002
Robust Supervisory Control for Manufacturing Systems with Unreliable Resources · ICRA 2002
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource allocation
0.012001
Deadlock avoidance for manufacturing systems with partially ordered process plans · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 2001
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.012000
Deadlock Avoidance for Manufacturing Systems with Partially Ordered Process Plans · ICRA 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

partial order analysis · 0.1deadlock detection and avoidance policy · 0.1supervisory control policy · 0.0reduced system analysis · 0.0resource allocation modeling · 0.0NP-completeness proof · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Robust Supervisory Control for Manufacturing Systems with Unreliable Resources
abstract
Manufacturing practitioners and researchers recognize the need to develop effective supervisory controllers for automated manufacturing systems. One active area of research has been developing deadlock avoidance methods for these systems. Almost all work to date has assumed that allocated resources do not fail. In this paper, we consider deadlock and blocking problems in systems with unreliable resources. Our objective is to develop supervisory control policies that allocate resources so the failure of any given resource does not propagate through blocking to effectively stall other portions of the system. To accomplish this, the supervisory controller must enforce liveness for the original system while avoiding states that do not serve as feasible initial states for the reduced system when an unreliable resource fails. The policy must then enforce liveness for the reduced system while avoiding states that do not serve as feasible initial states for the original system so transition to normal operation is smooth when the failed resource is restored.
Widodo Sulistyono, Mark A. Lawley
ICRA1
2002 Robust supervisory control policies for manufacturing systems with unreliable resources
abstract
Manufacturing practitioners and researchers have recognized the need to develop effective supervisory controllers for automated manufacturing systems. One active area of research has been developing deadlock avoidance methods for these systems. Almost all work to date has assumed that allocated resources do not fail. In this paper, we consider deadlock and blocking problems in systems with unreliable resources. Our objective is to develop supervisory control policies that allocate resources so that the failure of any given resource does not propagate through blocking to effectively stall other portions of the system. In other words, when a resource fails, we want the system to automatically continue producing all part types that do not require the failed resource. To accomplish this, the supervisory controller must ensure safety for the original system while avoiding states that do not serve as feasible initial states for the reduced system when an unreliable resource fails. The policy must then ensure safety for the reduced system while avoiding states that do not serve as feasible initial states for the original system so that transition to normal operation is smooth when the failed resource is restored. This paper illustrates this class of problems through several examples, identifies properties that controllers must satisfy to deal effectively with these problems, and develops two polynomial control policies that satisfy these properties.
Mark A. Lawley, Widodo Sulistyono
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.2
2001 Deadlock avoidance for manufacturing systems with partially ordered process plans
abstract
Most deadlock avoidance work in manufacturing deals with systems where each part type requires a fixed sequence of operations. In contrast, the paper deals with those systems that support sequencing flexibility, that is, the operations required by the part are partially ordered. In this setting, the order in which operations are performed is not predetermined but becomes a real-time decision. Specifically, the paper presents a detailed resource allocation model and proves the NP-completeness of optimal deadlock avoidance for a highly flexible subclass of these systems. It also identifies several cases and conditions for which optimal deadlock avoidance is of polynomial complexity.
Widodo Sulistyono, Mark A. Lawley
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.1
2000 Deadlock Avoidance for Manufacturing Systems with Partially Ordered Process Plans
abstract
Deadlock avoidance policies guarantee deadlock-free resource allocation to concurrent competing processes in flexible manufacturing systems. Most deadlock avoidance work in manufacturing deals with systems where each part requires a fired sequence of operations. In contrast, this paper deals with those systems that support sequencing flexibility, that is, the operations required by the part are partially ordered. In this setting, the order in which operations are performed is not predetermined, but becomes a real-time decision. Specifically, the paper characterizes the deadlock detection and avoidance problems for these systems, presents a sub-optimal deadlock avoidance approach, and addresses two relevant special structures on the partial orders for which optimal deadlock avoidance is of polynomial complexity.
Widodo Sulistyono, Mark A. Lawley
ICRA1