Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wolfgang Nowak
dblp:59/10398
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2583-8865ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Edge and fog computing · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering
numerical simulation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Using Surrogate Models and Data Assimilation for Efficient Mobile Simulations · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
surrogate modeling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Using Surrogate Models and Data Assimilation for Efficient Mobile Simulations · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2023 |
Edge and fog computing › mobile edge computing › computation offloading
mobile computation offloading |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Using Surrogate Models and Data Assimilation for Efficient Mobile Simulations · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2023 |
Computational science and engineering
partial differential equations |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Composing Partial Differential Equations with Physics-Aware Neural Networks · ICML 2022 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
PDE learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Composing Partial Differential Equations with Physics-Aware Neural Networks · ICML 2022 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
physics-informed machine learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Composing Partial Differential Equations with Physics-Aware Neural Networks · ICML 2022 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning › physics-informed machine learning
physics-informed neural networks |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Composing Partial Differential Equations with Physics-Aware Neural Networks · ICML 2022 |
Edge and fog computing
edge-assisted mobile computing |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Using Surrogate Models and Data Assimilation for Efficient Mobile Simulations · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2023 |
Visualization and visual analytics
flow visualization |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Flow Radar Glyphs - Static Visualization of Unsteady Flow with Uncertainty · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2011 |
Visualization and visual analytics
scientific visualization |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Flow Radar Glyphs - Static Visualization of Unsteady Flow with Uncertainty · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2011 |
Visualization and visual analytics
uncertainty visualization |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Flow Radar Glyphs - Static Visualization of Unsteady Flow with Uncertainty · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2011 |
Visualization and visual analytics › flow visualization
unsteady flow visualization |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Flow Radar Glyphs - Static Visualization of Unsteady Flow with Uncertainty · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2011 |
Visualization and visual analytics › visual encoding
glyph-based visualization |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Flow Radar Glyphs - Static Visualization of Unsteady Flow with Uncertainty · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2011 |
Visualization and visual analytics
visual analytics |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Flow Radar Glyphs - Static Visualization of Unsteady Flow with Uncertainty · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
surrogate model · 1.3data assimilation · 1.3neural network · 0.6finite volume method · 0.6compositional modeling · 0.6GPU-accelerated rendering · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Inferring Underwater Topography with Finite Volume Neural NetworksabstractPartial differential equations (PDEs) find applications across various scientific and engineering fields.There is a growing trend for integrating physics-aware machine learning models to solve PDEs.Among them, the Finite Volume Neural Network (FINN) has proven to be efficient in uncovering latent structures in data.This study explores the capabilities of FINN in the investigation of shallow-water equations, which simulate wave dynamics in coastal regions.Specifically, we investigate the efficacy of FINN in reconstructing underwater topography.We find that FINN excels at inferring topography solely from wave dynamics, stressing the importance of application-specific inductive bias in neural network architectures. Cosku Can Horuz, Matthias Karlbauer, Timothy Praditia, Sergey Oladyshkin, Wolfgang Nowak, Sebastian Otte |
ESANN | 5 |
| 2024 | Overdispersion in Gate Tomography: Experiments and Continuous, Two-Scale Random Walk Model on the Bloch SphereabstractNoisy intermediate-scale quantum computers (NISQ) are computing hardware in their childhood, but they are showing high promise and growing quickly. They are based on so-called qubits, which are the quantum equivalents of bits. Any given qubit state results in a given probability of observing a value of zero or one in the readout process. One of the main concerns for NISQ machines is the inherent noisiness of qubits, i.e., the observable frequencies of zeros and ones do not correspond to the theoretically expected probability, as the qubit states are subject to random disturbances over time and with each additional algorithmic operation applied to them. Models to describe the influence of this noise exist. In this study, we conduct extensive experiments on quantum noise. Based on our data, we show that existing noise models lack important aspects. Specifically, they fail to properly capture the aggregation of noise effects over time (or over an algorithm’s runtime), and they are underdispersed. With underdispersion, we refer to the fact that observable frequencies scatter much more between repeated experiments than what the standard assumptions of the binomial distribution would allow for. Based on these shortcomings, we develop an extended noise model for the probability distribution of observable frequencies as a function of the number of gate operations. The model roots back to a known continuous random walk on the (Bloch) sphere, where the angular diffusion coefficient can be used to characterize the standard noisiness of gate operations. Here, we superimpose a second random walk at the scale of multiple readouts to account for overdispersion. Further, our model has known, explicit components for noise during state preparation and measurement. The interaction of these two random walks predicts theoretical, runtime-dependent bounds for probabilities. Overall, it is a three-parameter distributional model that fits the data much better than the corresponding one-scale model (without overdispersion), and we demonstrate the better fit and the plausibility of the predicted bounds via Bayesian data-model analysis. Wolfgang Nowak, Tim Brünnette, Merel A. Schalkers, Matthias Möller |
ACM Trans. Quantum Comput. | 1 |
| 2023 | The deep arbitrary polynomial chaos neural network or how Deep Artificial Neural Networks could benefit from data-driven homogeneous chaos theory
Sergey Oladyshkin, Timothy Praditia, Ilja Kröker, Farid Mohammadi, Wolfgang Nowak, Sebastian Otte |
Neural Networks | 5 |
| 2023 | Using Surrogate Models and Data Assimilation for Efficient Mobile SimulationsabstractNumerical simulations on mobile devices are an important tool for engineers and decision makers in the field. However, providing simulation results on mobile devices is challenging due to the complexity of the simulation, requiring remote server resources and distributed mobile computation. The additional large size of multi-dimensional simulation results leads to the insufficient performance of existing approaches, especially when the bandwidth of wireless communication is scarce. In this article, we present an optimized novel approach utilizing surrogate models and data assimilation techniques to reduce the communication overhead. Evaluations show that our approach is up to 6.5 times faster than streaming results from the server while still meeting required quality constraints. Christoph Dibak, Wolfgang Nowak, Frank Dürr, Kurt Rothermel |
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. | 2 |
| 2022 | Infering Boundary Conditions in Finite Volume Neural Networks
Cosku Can Horuz, Matthias Karlbauer, Timothy Praditia, Martin V. Butz, Sergey Oladyshkin, Wolfgang Nowak, Sebastian Otte |
ICANN (1) | 6 |
| 2022 | Composing Partial Differential Equations with Physics-Aware Neural NetworksabstractWe introduce a compositional physics-aware FInite volume Neural Network (FINN) for learning spatiotemporal advection-diffusion processes. FINN implements a new way of combining the learning abilities of artificial neural networks with physical and structural knowledge from numerical simulation by modeling the constituents of partial differential equations (PDEs) in a compositional manner. Results on both one- and two-dimensional PDEs (Burgers’, diffusion-sorption, diffusion-reaction, Allen{–}Cahn) demonstrate FINN’s superior modeling accuracy and excellent out-of-distribution generalization ability beyond initial and boundary conditions. With only one tenth of the number of parameters on average, FINN outperforms pure machine learning and other state-of-the-art physics-aware models in all cases{—}often even by multiple orders of magnitude. Moreover, FINN outperforms a calibrated physical model when approximating sparse real-world data in a diffusion-sorption scenario, confirming its generalization abilities and showing explanatory potential by revealing the unknown retardation factor of the observed process. Matthias Karlbauer, Timothy Praditia, Sebastian Otte, Sergey Oladyshkin, Wolfgang Nowak, Martin V. Butz |
ICML | 5 |
| 2011 | Flow Radar Glyphs - Static Visualization of Unsteady Flow with UncertaintyabstractA new type of glyph is introduced to visualize unsteady flow with static images, allowing easier analysis of time-dependent phenomena compared to animated visualization. Adopting the visual metaphor of radar displays, this glyph represents flow directions by angles and time by radius in spherical coordinates. Dense seeding of flow radar glyphs on the flow domain naturally lends itself to multi-scale visualization: zoomed-out views show aggregated overviews, zooming-in enables detailed analysis of spatial and temporal characteristics. Uncertainty visualization is supported by extending the glyph to display possible ranges of flow directions. The paper focuses on 2D flow, but includes a discussion of 3D flow as well. Examples from CFD and the field of stochastic hydrogeology show that it is easy to discriminate regions of different spatiotemporal flow behavior and regions of different uncertainty variations in space and time. The examples also demonstrate that parameter studies can be analyzed because the glyph design facilitates comparative visualization. Finally, different variants of interactive GPU-accelerated implementations are discussed. Marcel Hlawatsch, Philipp C. Leube, Wolfgang Nowak, Daniel Weiskopf |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 3 |