Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel L. Ruderman
dblp:59/1098
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 57% 3D vision · 43% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.0 | 2 | 1993 | Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods · NIPS 1993 Phase-coupling in Two-Dimensional Networks of Interacting Oscillators · NIPS 1990 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
natural image statistics |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Optimal Sampling of Natural Images · NIPS 1990 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › neural dynamics
oscillating neural networks |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Phase-coupling in Two-Dimensional Networks of Interacting Oscillators · NIPS 1990 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis
network dynamics |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Phase-coupling in Two-Dimensional Networks of Interacting Oscillators · NIPS 1990 |
Image and video processing › image resampling › image rescaling
image downscaling |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Optimal Sampling of Natural Images · NIPS 1990 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optimal sampling · 0.0power spectrum analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | Learning Lie Groups for Invariant Visual Perception
Rajesh P. N. Rao, Daniel L. Ruderman |
NIPS | 2 |
| 1997 | Toward a Single-Cell Account for Binocular Disparity Tuning: An Energy Model May Be Hiding in Your Dendrites
Bartlett W. Mel, Daniel L. Ruderman, Kevin A. Archie |
NIPS | 2 |
| 1996 | Complex-Cell Responses Derived from Center-Surround Inputs: The Surprising Power of Intradendritic Computation
Bartlett W. Mel, Daniel L. Ruderman, Kevin A. Archie |
NIPS | 2 |
| 1993 | Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods
Daniel L. Ruderman, William Bialek |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1992 | Seeing Beyond the Nyquist LimitabstractIn many biological systems the primary transduction of sensory stimuli occurs in a regular array of receptors. Because of this discrete sampling it is usually assumed that the organism has no knowledge of signals beyond the Nyquist frequency. In fact, higher frequency signals are expected to mask the available lower frequency information as a result of aliasing. It has been suggested that these considerations are important in understanding, for example, the design of the receptor lattice in the mammalian fovea. We show that if the organism has knowledge of the probability distribution from which the signals are drawn, outputs from a discrete receptor array can be used to estimate signals beyond the Nyquist limit. In effect, a priori knowledge can be used to de-alias the image, and the estimated signal above the Nyquist cutoff is in fact coherent with the real signal at these high frequencies. We address initially the problem of stimulus reconstruction from a noisy receptor array responding to a Gaussian stimulus ensemble. In this case, the best reconstruction strategy is a simple linear transformation. In the more interesting (and natural) case of nongaussian stimuli, optimal reconstruction requires nonlinear operations, but the higher order correlations in the stimulus ensemble can be used to improve the estimate of super-Nyquist signals. Daniel L. Ruderman, William Bialek |
Neural Comput. | 1 |
| 1990 | Optimal Sampling of Natural Images
William Bialek, Daniel L. Ruderman, A. Zee |
NIPS | 2 |
| 1990 | Phase-coupling in Two-Dimensional Networks of Interacting Oscillators
Ernst Niebur, Daniel M. Kammen, Christof Koch, Daniel L. Ruderman, Heinz G. Schuster |
NIPS | 4 |