Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel L. Ruderman

dblp:59/1098 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 57% 3D vision · 43%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.021993
Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods · NIPS 1993
Phase-coupling in Two-Dimensional Networks of Interacting Oscillators · NIPS 1990
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
natural image statistics
0.011990
Optimal Sampling of Natural Images · NIPS 1990
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › neural dynamics
oscillating neural networks
0.011990
Phase-coupling in Two-Dimensional Networks of Interacting Oscillators · NIPS 1990
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis
network dynamics
0.011990
Phase-coupling in Two-Dimensional Networks of Interacting Oscillators · NIPS 1990
Image and video processing › image resampling › image rescaling
image downscaling
0.011990
Optimal Sampling of Natural Images · NIPS 1990

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimal sampling · 0.0power spectrum analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Learning Lie Groups for Invariant Visual Perception
Rajesh P. N. Rao, Daniel L. Ruderman
NIPS2
1997 Toward a Single-Cell Account for Binocular Disparity Tuning: An Energy Model May Be Hiding in Your Dendrites
Bartlett W. Mel, Daniel L. Ruderman, Kevin A. Archie
NIPS2
1996 Complex-Cell Responses Derived from Center-Surround Inputs: The Surprising Power of Intradendritic Computation
Bartlett W. Mel, Daniel L. Ruderman, Kevin A. Archie
NIPS2
1993 Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods
Daniel L. Ruderman, William Bialek
NIPS1
1992 Seeing Beyond the Nyquist Limit
abstract
In many biological systems the primary transduction of sensory stimuli occurs in a regular array of receptors. Because of this discrete sampling it is usually assumed that the organism has no knowledge of signals beyond the Nyquist frequency. In fact, higher frequency signals are expected to mask the available lower frequency information as a result of aliasing. It has been suggested that these considerations are important in understanding, for example, the design of the receptor lattice in the mammalian fovea. We show that if the organism has knowledge of the probability distribution from which the signals are drawn, outputs from a discrete receptor array can be used to estimate signals beyond the Nyquist limit. In effect, a priori knowledge can be used to de-alias the image, and the estimated signal above the Nyquist cutoff is in fact coherent with the real signal at these high frequencies. We address initially the problem of stimulus reconstruction from a noisy receptor array responding to a Gaussian stimulus ensemble. In this case, the best reconstruction strategy is a simple linear transformation. In the more interesting (and natural) case of nongaussian stimuli, optimal reconstruction requires nonlinear operations, but the higher order correlations in the stimulus ensemble can be used to improve the estimate of super-Nyquist signals.
Daniel L. Ruderman, William Bialek
Neural Comput.1
1990 Optimal Sampling of Natural Images
William Bialek, Daniel L. Ruderman, A. Zee
NIPS2
1990 Phase-coupling in Two-Dimensional Networks of Interacting Oscillators
Ernst Niebur, Daniel M. Kammen, Christof Koch, Daniel L. Ruderman, Heinz G. Schuster
NIPS4