With growing use of hardware intellectual property (IP) based integrated circuits (IC) design and increasing reliance on a globalized supply chain, the threats to confidentiality of hardware IPs have emerged as major security concerns to the IP producers and owners. These threats are diverse, including reverse engineering (RE), piracy, cloning, and extraction of design secrets, and span different phases of electronics life cycle. The academic research community and the semiconductor industry have made significant efforts over the past decade on developing effective methodologies and CAD tools targeted to protect hardware IPs against these threats. These solutions include watermarking, logic locking, obfuscation, camouflaging, split manufacturing, and hardware redaction. This paper focuses on key topics on confidentiality of hardware IPs encompassing the major threats, protection approaches, security analysis, and metrics. It discusses the strengths and limitations of the major solutions in protecting hardware IPs against the confidentiality attacks, and future directions to address the limitations in the modern supply chain ecosystem.

Logic locking has emerged as a promising solution to protect integrated circuits against piracy and tampering. However, the security provided by existing logic locking techniques is often thwarted by Boolean satisfiability (SAT)-based oracle-guided attacks. Criteria for successful SAT attacks on locked circuits include: (i) the circuit under attack is fully combinational, or (ii) the attacker has scan chain access. To address the threat posed by SAT-based attacks, we adopt the dynamically obfuscated scan chain (DOSC) architecture and illustrate its resiliency against the SAT attacks when inserted into the scan chain of an obfuscated design. We demonstrate, both mathematically and experimentally, that DOSC exponentially increases the resiliency against key extraction by SAT attack and its variants. Our results show that the mathematical estimation of attack complexity correlates to the experimental results with an accuracy of 95% or better. Along with the formal proof, we model DOSC architecture to its equivalent combinational circuit and perform SAT attack to evaluate its resiliency empirically. Our experiments demonstrate that SAT attack on DOSC-inserted benchmark circuits timeout at minimal test time overhead, and while DOSC requires less than 1% area and power overhead.

The globalization of the semiconductor supply chain introduces ever-increasing security and privacy risks. Two major concerns are IP theft through reverse engineering and malicious modification of the design. The latter concern in part relies on successful reverse engineering of the design as well. IC camouflaging and logic locking are two of the techniques under research that can thwart reverse engineering by end-users or foundries. However, developing low overhead locking/camouflaging schemes that can resist the ever-evolving state-of-the-art attacks has been a challenge for several years. This article provides a comprehensive review of the state of the art with respect to locking/camouflaging techniques. We start by defining a systematic threat model for these techniques and discuss how various real-world scenarios relate to each threat model. We then discuss the evolution of generic algorithmic attacks under each threat model eventually leading to the strongest existing attacks. The article then systematizes defences and along the way discusses attacks that are more specific to certain kinds of locking/camouflaging. The article then concludes by discussing open problems and future directions.

research-article Share on Defense Systems and IoT: Security Issues in an Era of Distributed Command and Control Authors: Doug Palmer Booz Allen Hamilton, Arlington, VA, USA Booz Allen Hamilton, Arlington, VA, USAView Profile , Saverio Fazzari Booz Allen Hamilton, Arlington, VA, USA Booz Allen Hamilton, Arlington, VA, USAView Profile , Scott Wartenberg Wartenberg Consulting, LLC, Vienna, VA, USA Wartenberg Consulting, LLC, Vienna, VA, USAView Profile Authors Info & Claims GLSVLSI '16: Proceedings of the 26th edition on Great Lakes Symposium on VLSIMay 2016Pages 175–179https://doi.org/10.1145/2902961.2903038Published:18 May 2016Publication History 3citation260DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations3Total Downloads260Last 12 Months5Last 6 weeks0 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access

The Semiconductor Industry Associates (SIA) estimates that counterfeiting costs the US semiconductor companies $7.5B in lost revenue, and this is indeed a growing global problem. Repackaging the old ICs, selling the failed test parts, as well as gray marketing, are the most dominant counterfeiting practices. Can technology do a better job than lawyers? What are the technical challenges to be addressed? What EDA technologies will work: embedding IP protection measures in the design phase, developing rapid post- silicon certification, or counterfeit detection tools and methods?