Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter K. Malkin

dblp:59/3643 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 54% Graph learning · 46%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.011990
LOGnets: A Hybrid Graph Spatial Representation for Robot Navigation · AAAI 1990
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
mobile robot navigation
0.011990
LOGnets: A Hybrid Graph Spatial Representation for Robot Navigation · AAAI 1990
Machine learning › Graph learning
spatial graph representation
0.011990
LOGnets: A Hybrid Graph Spatial Representation for Robot Navigation · AAAI 1990
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
spatial representation
0.011990
LOGnets: A Hybrid Graph Spatial Representation for Robot Navigation · AAAI 1990
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization
0.011990
LOGnets: A Hybrid Graph Spatial Representation for Robot Navigation · AAAI 1990

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spatial encoding · 0.0hybrid graph representation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Diagnostic visualization for non-expert machine learning practitioners: A design study
abstract
As machine learning (ML) becomes increasingly popular, developers without deep experience in ML - who we will refer to as ML practitioners - are facing the need to diagnose problems with ML models. Yet successful diagnosis requires high-level expertise that practitioners lack. As in many complex data-oriented domains, visualization could help. This two-phase study explored the design of visualizations to aid ML diagnosis. In phase 1, twelve ML practitioners were asked to diagnose a model using ten state-of-the-art visualizations; seven design themes were identified. In phase 2, several design themes were embodied in an interactive visualization. The visualization was used to engage practitioners in a participatory design exercise that explored how they would carry out multi-step diagnosis using the visualization. Our findings provide design implications for tools that better support ML diagnosis by non-expert practitioners.
Rachel K. E. Bellamy, Peter K. Malkin, Thomas Erickson
VL/HCC3
1990 LOGnets: A Hybrid Graph Spatial Representation for Robot Navigation
Peter K. Malkin, Sanjaya Addanki
AAAI1
1988 Logical Matrix Generation and Testing
Peter K. Malkin, Errol P. Martin
CADE1