Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew Arnold
dblp:59/4102
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
11as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 7 · 7 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 57% Data mining · 43% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Query dependent ranking using K-nearest neighbor · SIGIR 2008 |
Information retrieval › ranking
query-dependent ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Query dependent ranking using K-nearest neighbor · SIGIR 2008 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Query dependent ranking using K-nearest neighbor · SIGIR 2008 |
Data mining › causal inference
causal modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Temporal causal modeling with graphical granger methods · KDD 2007 |
Data mining › causal inference › causal modeling › causal discovery
granger causality |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Temporal causal modeling with graphical granger methods · KDD 2007 |
Data mining
probabilistic graphical models |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Temporal causal modeling with graphical granger methods · KDD 2007 |
Data mining › probabilistic graphical models
structure learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Temporal causal modeling with graphical granger methods · KDD 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stability theory · 0.1k-nearest neighbor · 0.1graphical modeling · 0.1LASSO · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Faster sparse multivariate polynomial interpolation of straight-line programs
Andrew Arnold, Mark Giesbrecht, Daniel S. Roche |
J. Symb. Comput. | 1 |
| 2015 | Error-Correcting Sparse Interpolation in the Chebyshev BasisabstractWe present an error-correcting interpolation algorithm for a univariate black-box polynomial that has a sparse representation using Chebyshev polynomials as a term basis. Our algorithm assumes that an upper bound on the number of erroneous evaluations is given as input, and is a generalization of the algorithm by Lakshman and Saunder [SIAM J. Comput., vol. 24 (1995)] for interpolating sparse Chebyshev polynomials and the techniques in error-correcting sparse interpolation in the usual basis of consecutive powers of the variable due to Comer, Kaltofen, and Pernet [Proc. ISSAC 2012 and 2014]. We prove the correctness of our list-decoder-based algorithm with a Descartes-rule-of-signs-like property for sparse polynomials in Chebyshev basis. We also give a new algorithm that reduces the sparse interpolation in Chebyshev basis to that in power basis, thus making the many techniques for the sparse interpolation in power basis, for instance, supersparse (lacunary) interpolation over large finite fields, available to interpolation in Chebyshev basis. Furthermore, we can customize the randomized early termination algorithms from Kaltofen and Lee [J. Symb. Comput., vol. 36 (2003)] to our new approach. Andrew Arnold, Erich L. Kaltofen |
ISSAC | 1 |
| 2015 | Output-Sensitive Algorithms for Sumset and Sparse Polynomial MultiplicationabstractWe present randomized algorithms to compute the sumset (Minkowski sum) of two integer sets, and to multiply two univariate integer polynomials given by sparse representations. Our algorithm for sumset has cost softly linear in the combined size of the inputs and output. This is used as part of our sparse multiplication algorithm, whose cost is softly linear in the combined size of the inputs, output, and the sumset of the supports of the inputs. As a subroutine, we present a new method for computing the coefficients of a sparse polynomial, given a set containing its support. Our multiplication algorithm extends to multivariate Laurent polynomials over finite fields and rational numbers. Our techniques are based on sparse interpolation algorithms and results from analytic number theory. Andrew Arnold, Daniel S. Roche |
ISSAC | 1 |
| 2014 | Sparse interpolation over finite fields via low-order roots of unityabstractWe present a new Monte Carlo algorithm for the interpolation of a straight-line program as a sparse polynomial f over an arbitrary finite field of size q. We assume a priori bounds D and T are given on the degree and number of terms of f. The approach presented in this paper is a hybrid of the diversified and recursive interpolation algorithms, the two previous fastest known probabilistic methods for this problem. By making effective use of the information contained in the coefficients themselves, this new algorithm improves on the bit complexity of previous methods by a "soft-Oh" factor of T, log D, or log q. Andrew Arnold, Mark Giesbrecht, Daniel S. Roche |
ISSAC | 1 |
| 2014 | Multivariate sparse interpolation using randomized Kronecker substitutionsabstractWe present new techniques for reducing a multivariate sparse polynomial to a univariate polynomial. The reduction works similarly to the classical and widely-used Kronecker substitution, except that we choose the degrees randomly based on the number of nonzero terms in the multivariate polynomial. The resulting univariate polynomial often has a significantly lower degree than the Kronecker substitution polynomial, at the expense of a small number of term collisions. As an application, we give a new algorithm for multivariate interpolation which uses these new techniques along with any existing univariate interpolation algorithm. Andrew Arnold, Daniel S. Roche |
ISSAC | 1 |
| 2013 | Faster Sparse Interpolation of Straight-Line Programs
Andrew Arnold, Mark Giesbrecht, Daniel S. Roche |
CASC | 1 |
| 2013 | A new truncated fourier transform algorithmabstractTruncated Fourier Transforms (TFTs), first introduced by van der Hoeven, refer to a family of algorithms that attempt to smooth ``jumps'' in complexity exhibited by FFT algorithms. We present an in-place TFT whose time complexity, measured in terms of ring operations, is asymptotically equivalent to existing not-in-place TFT methods. We also describe a transformation that maps between two families of TFT algorithms that use different sets of evaluation points. Andrew Arnold |
ISSAC | 1 |
| 2010 | Structured literature image finder: Parsing text and figures in biomedical literature
Amr Ahmed 0001, Andrew Arnold, Luís Pedro Coelho, Joshua D. Kangas, Abdul-Saboor Sheikh, Eric P. Xing, William W. Cohen, Robert F. Murphy |
J. Web Semant. | 2 |
| 2009 | Information Extraction as Link Prediction: Using Curated Citation Networks to Improve Gene Detection
Andrew Arnold, William W. Cohen |
ICWSM | 1 |
| 2009 | Information Extraction as Link Prediction: Using Curated Citation Networks to Improve Gene Detection
Andrew Arnold, William W. Cohen |
WASA | 1 |
| 2008 | Intra-document structural frequency features for semi-supervised domain adaptationabstractIn this work we try to bridge the gap often encountered by researchers who find themselves with few or no labeled examples from their desired target domain, yet still have access to large amounts of labeled data from other related, but distinct source domains, and seemingly no way to transfer knowledge from one to the other. Experimentally, we focus on the problem of extracting protein mentions from academic publications in the field of biology, where the source domain data are abstracts labeled with protein mentions, and the target domain data are wholly unlabeled captions. We mine the large number of such full text articles freely available on the Internet in order to supplement the limited amount of annotated data available. By exploiting the explicit and implicit common structure of the different subsections of these documents, including the unlabeled full text, we are able to generate robust features that are insensitive to changes in marginal and conditional distributions of classes and data across domains. We supplement these domain-insensitive features with automatically obtained high-confidence positive and negative predictions on the target domain to learn extractors that generalize well from one section of a document to another. Finally, lacking labeled target testing data, we employ comparative user preference studies to evaluate the relative performance of the proposed methods with respect to existing baselines. Andrew Arnold, William W. Cohen |
CIKM | 1 |
| 2008 | Query dependent ranking using K-nearest neighborabstractMany ranking models have been proposed in information retrieval, and recently machine learning techniques have also been applied to ranking model construction. Most of the existing methods do not take into consideration the fact that significant differences exist between queries, and only resort to a single function in ranking of documents. In this paper, we argue that it is necessary to employ different ranking models for different queries and onduct what we call query-dependent ranking. As the first such attempt, we propose a K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) method for query-dependent ranking. We first consider an online method which creates a ranking model for a given query by using the labeled neighbors of the query in the query feature space and then rank the documents with respect to the query using the created model. Next, we give two offline approximations of the method, which create the ranking models in advance to enhance the efficiency of ranking. And we prove a theory which indicates that the approximations are accurate in terms of difference in loss of prediction, if the learning algorithm used is stable with respect to minor changes in training examples. Our experimental results show that the proposed online and offline methods both outperform the baseline method of using a single ranking function. Xiubo Geng, Tie-Yan Liu, Tao Qin 0001, Andrew Arnold, Hang Li 0001, Harry Shum |
SIGIR | 4 |
| 2007 | Temporal causal modeling with graphical granger methodsabstractThe need for mining causality, beyond mere statistical correlations, for real world problems has been recognized widely. Many of these applications naturally involve temporal data, which raises the challenge of how best to leverage the temporal information for causal modeling. Recently graphical modeling with the concept of “Granger causality”, based on the intuition that a cause helps predict its effects in the future, has gained attention in many domains involving time series data analysis. With the surge of interest in model selection methodologies for regression, such as the Lasso, as practical alternatives to solving structural learning of graphical models, the question arises whether and how to combine these two notions into a practically viable approach for temporal causal modeling. In this paper, we examine a host of related Andrew Arnold, Yan Liu 0002, Naoki Abe |
KDD | 1 |