Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Susumu Fujiwara

dblp:59/5801 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › specification-based testing
conformance testing
0.011991
Test Selection Based on Finite State Models · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1991
Software testing › model-based testing
finite state machine testing
0.011991
Test Selection Based on Finite State Models · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1991
Software testing › regression testing
test selection
0.011991
Test Selection Based on Finite State Models · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1991
Software testing
protocol testing
0.011991
Test Selection Based on Finite State Models · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

finite state models · 0.0fault detection · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1991 Test Selection Based on Finite State Models
abstract
A method for the selection of appropriate test case, an important issue for conformance testing of protocol implementations as well as software engineering, is presented. Called the partial W-method, it is shown to have general applicability, full fault-detection power, and yields shorter test suites than the W-method. Various other issues that have an impact on the selection of a suitable test suite including the consideration of interaction parameters, various test architectures for protocol testing and the fact that many specifications do not satisfy the assumptions made by most test selection methods (such as complete definition, a correctly implemented reset function, a limited number of states in the implementation, and determinism), are discussed.>
Susumu Fujiwara, Gregor von Bochmann, Ferhat Khendek, Mokhtar Amalou, Abderrazak Ghedamsi
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1