VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Susumu Fujiwara
dblp:59/5801
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing › specification-based testing
conformance testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Test Selection Based on Finite State Models · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1991 |
Software testing › model-based testing
finite state machine testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Test Selection Based on Finite State Models · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1991 |
Software testing › regression testing
test selection |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Test Selection Based on Finite State Models · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1991 |
Software testing
protocol testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Test Selection Based on Finite State Models · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1991 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
finite state models · 0.0fault detection · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | Test Selection Based on Finite State ModelsabstractA method for the selection of appropriate test case, an important issue for conformance testing of protocol implementations as well as software engineering, is presented. Called the partial W-method, it is shown to have general applicability, full fault-detection power, and yields shorter test suites than the W-method. Various other issues that have an impact on the selection of a suitable test suite including the consideration of interaction parameters, various test architectures for protocol testing and the fact that many specifications do not satisfy the assumptions made by most test selection methods (such as complete definition, a correctly implemented reset function, a limited number of states in the implementation, and determinism), are discussed.> Susumu Fujiwara, Gregor von Bochmann, Ferhat Khendek, Mokhtar Amalou, Abderrazak Ghedamsi |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |