Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Medha Bhadkamkar
dblp:59/6830
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 6 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
5 papers |
Storage systems · 89% Energy-efficient computing · 8% Memory systems · 3% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems › storage management
backup systems |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Getting Back Up: Understanding How Enterprise Data Backups Fail · USENIX ATC 2016 |
Storage systems
storage reliability |
0.1 | 2 | 2016 | Getting Back Up: Understanding How Enterprise Data Backups Fail · USENIX ATC 2016 Identifying Trends in Enterprise Data Protection Systems · USENIX ATC 2015 |
Storage systems › data management › database storage
semi-structured data storage |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Storing semi-structured data on disk drives · ACM Trans. Storage 2009 |
Storage systems
energy-efficient storage |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | EXCES: External caching in energy saving storage systems · HPCA 2008 |
Energy-efficient computing
storage power management |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | EXCES: External caching in energy saving storage systems · HPCA 2008 |
Memory systems
data layout optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | BORG: Block-reORGanization for Self-optimizing Storage Systems · FAST 2009 |
Storage systems › magnetic storage
disk storage |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | EXCES: External caching in energy saving storage systems · HPCA 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
benchmarking · 0.1prefetching · 0.1caching · 0.1buffering · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Getting Back Up: Understanding How Enterprise Data Backups Fail
George Amvrosiadis, Medha Bhadkamkar |
USENIX ATC | 2 |
| 2015 | Soothsayer: Predicting Capacity Usage in Backup Storage SystemsabstractProtecting data from loss is of crucial significance to businesses. Failure to protect data can lead to heavy financial and strategic losses, that are often difficult to recover from. Thus, businesses employ backup techniques to store copies of data to enable failure recovery. But surprisingly, backups often fail. Our analysis of about 48,000 installations over a period of 3 years shows that one in six errors result from inadequate storage capacity and yet, little research has been done in the area of storage capacity forecasting that could mitigate these errors. In this paper, we propose Soothsayer, a simulation model that accurately predicts capacity usage by employing 3 techniques: autoregressive and moving-average modeling, clustering and stochastic modeling, and linear regression. Furthermore, our models provide a range of times when the capacity is likely to be reached, rather than a single point estimate, which is more beneficial in capacity planning. We evaluate the accuracy of our model using synthetic data as well as real world data. Our results show that our models outperform the previous piecewise regression method proposed by Chamness when applied to nonlinear datasets, while performing comparably when applied to linear datasets. Christy Vaughn, Caleb Miller, Onyebuchi Ekenta, Medha Bhadkamkar, Petros Efstathopoulos, Erim Kardes |
MASCOTS | 5 |
| 2015 | Identifying Trends in Enterprise Data Protection Systems
George Amvrosiadis, Medha Bhadkamkar |
USENIX ATC | 2 |
| 2009 | BORG: Block-reORGanization for Self-optimizing Storage Systems
Medha Bhadkamkar, Jorge Guerra, Luis Useche, Sam Burnett, Jason Liptak, Raju Rangaswami, Vagelis Hristidis |
FAST | 1 |
| 2009 | Storing semi-structured data on disk drivesabstractApplications that manage semi-structured data are becoming increasingly commonplace. Current approaches for storing semi-structured data use existing storage machinery; they either map the data to relational databases, or use a combination of flat files and indexes. While employing these existing storage mechanisms provides readily available solutions, there is a need to more closely examine their suitability to this class of data. Particularly, retrofitting existing solutions for semi-structured data can result in a mismatch between the tree structure of the data and the access characteristics of the underlying storage device (disk drive). This study explores various possibilities in the design space of native storage solutions for semi-structured data by exploring alternative approaches that match application data access characteristics to those of the underlying disk drive. For evaluating the effectiveness of the proposed native techniques in relation to the existing solution, we experiment with XML data using the XPathMark benchmark. Extensive evaluation reveals the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed native data layout techniques. While the existing solutions work really well for deep-focused queries into a semi-structured document (those that result in retrieving entire subtrees), the proposed native solutions substantially outperform for the non-deep-focused queries, which we demonstrate are at least as important as the deep-focused. We believe that native data layout techniques offer a unique direction for improving the performance of semi-structured data stores for a variety of important workloads. However, given that the proposed native techniques require circumventing current storage stack abstractions, further investigation is warranted before they can be applied to general-purpose storage systems. Medha Bhadkamkar, Fernando Farfán, Vagelis Hristidis, Raju Rangaswami |
ACM Trans. Storage | 1 |
| 2008 | EXCES: External caching in energy saving storage systemsabstractPower consumption within the disk-based storage subsystem forms a substantial portion of the overall energy footprint in commodity systems. Researchers have proposed external caching on a persistent, low-power storage device, which we term external caching device (ECD), to minimize disk activity and conserve energy. While recent simulation-based studies have argued in favor of this approach, the lack of an actual system implementation has precluded answering several key questions about external caching systems. We present the design and implementation of EXCES, an external caching system that employs prefetching, caching, and buffering of disk data for reducing disk activity. EXCES addresses important questions related to external caching, including the estimation of future data popularity, I/O indirection, continuous reconfiguration of the ECD contents, and data consistency. We evaluated EXCES with both micro- and macro- benchmarks that address idle, I/O intensive, and real-world workloads. Overall system energy savings was found to lie in the modest 2–14% range, depending on the workload, in somewhat of a contrast to the higher values predicted by earlier studies. Furthermore, while the CPU and memory overheads of EXCES were well within acceptable limits, we found that flash-based external caching can substantially degrade I/O performance. We believe that external caching systems hold promise. Further improvements in ECD technology, both in terms of their power consumption and performance characteristics can help realize the full potential of such systems. Luis Useche, Jorge Guerra, Medha Bhadkamkar, Mauricio Alarcon, Raju Rangaswami |
HPCA | 3 |