Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bei Hong

dblp:59/8180 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Segmentation and scene understanding · 67% Deep learning architectures and training · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training
end-to-end deep learning
0.812024
DeepMulticut: Deep Learning of Multicut Problem for Neuron Segmentation From Electron Microscopy Volume · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › biomedical image segmentation
neuron segmentation
0.812024
DeepMulticut: Deep Learning of Multicut Problem for Neuron Segmentation From Electron Microscopy Volume · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › perceptual grouping
superpixel grouping
0.812024
DeepMulticut: Deep Learning of Multicut Problem for Neuron Segmentation From Electron Microscopy Volume · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

greedy additive edge contraction · 0.8differentiable optimization · 0.8bi-level optimization · 0.8Edge-CNN · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 A novel 3D instance segmentation network for synapse reconstruction from serial electron microscopy images
Jing Liu 0054, Bei Hong, Chi Xiao 0002, Hao Zhai 0003, Lijun Shen, Qiwei Xie, Hua Han 0001
Expert Syst. Appl.2
2024 DeepMulticut: Deep Learning of Multicut Problem for Neuron Segmentation From Electron Microscopy Volume
abstract
Superpixel aggregation is a powerful tool for automated neuron segmentation from electron microscopy (EM) volume. However, existing graph partitioning methods for superpixel aggregation still involve two separate stages-model estimation and model solving, and therefore model error is inherent. To address this issue, we integrate the two stages and propose an end-to-end aggregation framework based on deep learning of the minimum cost multicut problem called DeepMulticut. The core challenge lies in differentiating the NP-hard multicut problem, whose constraint number is exponential in the problem size. With this in mind, we resort to relaxing the combinatorial solver-the greedy additive edge contraction (GAEC)-to a continuous Soft-GAEC algorithm, whose limit is shown to be the vanilla GAEC. Such relaxation thus allows the DeepMulticut to integrate edge cost estimators, Edge-CNNs, into a differentiable multicut optimization system and allows a decision-oriented loss to feed decision quality back to the Edge-CNNs for adaptive discriminative feature learning. Hence, the model estimators, Edge-CNNs, can be trained to improve partitioning decisions directly while beyond the NP-hardness. Also, we explain the rationale behind the DeepMulticut framework from the perspective of bi-level optimization. Extensive experiments on three public EM datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed DeepMulticut.
Zhenchen Li, Xu Yang 0004, Bei Hong, Hao Zhai 0003, Lijun Shen, Xi Chen 0031, Zhiyong Liu 0001, Hua Han 0001
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.4
2023 Graph partitioning algorithms with biological connectivity decisions for neuron reconstruction in electron microscope volumes
Bei Hong, Jing Liu 0054, Lijun Shen, Qiwei Xie, Jingbin Yuan, Ali Emrouznejad, Hua Han 0001
Expert Syst. Appl.1
2022 Joint reconstruction of neuron and ultrastructure via connectivity consensus in electron microscope volumes
abstract
BACKGROUND: Nanoscale connectomics, which aims to map the fine connections between neurons with synaptic-level detail, has attracted increasing attention in recent years. Currently, the automated reconstruction algorithms in electron microscope volumes are in great demand. Most existing reconstruction methodologies for cellular and subcellular structures are independent, and exploring the inter-relationships between structures will contribute to image analysis. The primary goal of this research is to construct a joint optimization framework to improve the accuracy and efficiency of neural structure reconstruction algorithms. RESULTS: In this investigation, we introduce the concept of connectivity consensus between cellular and subcellular structures based on biological domain knowledge for neural structure agglomeration problems. We propose a joint graph partitioning model for solving ultrastructural and neuronal connections to overcome the limitations of connectivity cues at different levels. The advantage of the optimization model is the simultaneous reconstruction of multiple structures in one optimization step. The experimental results on several public datasets demonstrate that the joint optimization model outperforms existing hierarchical agglomeration algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: We present a joint optimization model by connectivity consensus to solve the neural structure agglomeration problem and demonstrate its superiority to existing methods. The intention of introducing connectivity consensus between different structures is to build a suitable optimization model that makes the reconstruction goals more consistent with biological plausible and domain knowledge. This idea can inspire other researchers to optimize existing reconstruction algorithms and other areas of biological data analysis.
Bei Hong, Jing Liu 0054, Hao Zhai 0003, Lijun Shen, Xi Chen 0031, Qiwei Xie, Hua Han 0001
BMC Bioinform.1