Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jürgen Franke 0003
dblp:59/8468
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 75% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 25% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing › document image analysis
character recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Document analysis-from pixels to contents · Proc. IEEE 1992 |
Image and video processing
document image analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Document analysis-from pixels to contents · Proc. IEEE 1992 |
Image and video processing › document image analysis
document layout analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Document analysis-from pixels to contents · Proc. IEEE 1992 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
document understanding |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Document analysis-from pixels to contents · Proc. IEEE 1992 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
knowledge modeling · 0.0contextual processing · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | Polynominal Classifiers and Support Vector Machines
Ingo Graf, Ulrich Kressel, Jürgen Franke 0003 |
ICANN | 3 |
| 1997 | A Comparison of Gaussian Distribution and Polynomial Classifiers in a Hidden Markov Model Based System for the Recognition of Cursive ScriptabstractHandwriting recognition systems based on hidden Markov models commonly use a vector quantizer to get the required symbol sequence. In order to get better recognition rates semi-continuous hidden Markov models have been applied. Those recognizers need a soft vector quantizer which superimposes a statistical distribution for symbol generation. In general, Gaussian distributions are applied. A disadvantage of this technique is the assumption of a specific distribution. No proof can be given whether this presupposition holds in practice. Therefore, the application of a method which employs no model of a distribution may achieve some improvements. The paper presents the employment of a polynomial classifier as a replacement of a Gaussian classifier in the handwriting recognition system. The replacement improves the recognition rate significantly, as the results show. Jürgen Franke 0003, Joachim M. Gloger, Alfred Kaltenmeier, Eberhard Mandler |
ICDAR | 1 |
| 1997 | Comparing Gaussian and polynomial classification in SCHMM-based recognition systemsabstractSemi-continuous Hidden Markov Models (SCHMM) with gaussian distributions are often used in continuous speech or handwriting recognition systems. Our paper compares gaussian and tree-structured polynomial classi ers which have been successfully used in pattern recognition since many years. In our system the binary classi er tree is generated by clustering HMM states using an entropy measure. For handwriting recognition, gaussians are clearly outperformed by polynomial classi cation. However, for speech recognition, polynomial classi cation currently performs slightly worse because some system parameters are not yet optimized. Alfred Kaltenmeier, Jürgen Franke 0003 |
EUROSPEECH | 2 |
| 1993 | Writing style detection by statistical combination of classifiers in form reader applicationsabstractThe authors deal with the recognition of writing style (whether a data field is hand or machine printed) in the context of form reading applications. Due to the form reader's hardware restrictions, the approach had to be based only on the knowledge of the surrounding rectangles of the black connected components of the data field. Different statistical classifiers were developed which were adapted to different feature vectors calculated separately for each data field. The output of these classifiers was combined, allowing a much higher performance than each single classifier. The combination was carried out by another polynomial (statistical) classifier using the estimations, not decisions, of these classifiers as the new feature vector. The improvement by combination was significant. Meanwhile the approach has proven its practical viability while running successfully in commercially distributed form readers.> Jürgen Franke 0003, Matthias F. Oberländer |
ICDAR | 1 |
| 1992 | A comparison of two approaches for combining the votes of cooperating classifiersabstractTwo different approaches are described to combine the results of different classifiers. The first approach is based on the Dempster/Shafer theory of evidence and the second one is a statistical approach with some assumptions on the input data. Both approaches were tested for user-dependent recognition of on-line handwritten characters.> Jürgen Franke 0003, Eberhard Mandler |
ICPR (2) | 1 |
| 1992 | Document analysis-from pixels to contentsabstractThe authors present a conceptual framework for solving the task of document analysis, which, in essence, consists in the conversion of the document's pixel representation into an equivalent knowledge network representation holding the document's content and layout. Starting on the pixel level, the formation of elementary geometric objects on which layout analysis as well as the definition of character objects is based is described. Character recognition accomplishes the mapping from geometric object to character meaning in ASCII representation. On the next level of abstraction words are formed and verified by contextual processing. Modeled knowledge about complete documents and about how their constituents are related to the application forms the highest level of abstraction. The various problems arising at each stage are discussed. The dependencies between the different levels are exemplified and technical solutions put forward.> Jürgen Schürmann, Norbert Bartneck, Thomas Bayer, Jürgen Franke 0003, Eberhard Mandler, Matthias F. Oberländer |
Proc. IEEE | 4 |