VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rui Zhang 0121
dblp:60/2536-121
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0001-3664-5607ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › survival analysis
cox proportional hazards model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FastSurvival: Hidden Computational Blessings in Training Cox Proportional Hazards Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
survival analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FastSurvival: Hidden Computational Blessings in Training Cox Proportional Hazards Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › matroid constraint
cardinality constraint |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FastSurvival: Hidden Computational Blessings in Training Cox Proportional Hazards Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FastSurvival: Hidden Computational Blessings in Training Cox Proportional Hazards Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
regression trees |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Optimal Sparse Regression Trees · AAAI 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Optimal Sparse Regression Trees · AAAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
newton method · 1.5monotonic loss decrease · 1.5k-means clustering lower bound · 1.3dynamic programming with bounds · 1.3surrogate functions · 0.8surrogate function · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Optimal Sparse Survival TreesabstractInterpretability is crucial for doctors, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology corporations to analyze and make decisions for high stakes problems that involve human health. Tree-based methods have been widely adopted for survival analysis due to their appealing interpretablility and their ability to capture complex relationships. However, most existing methods to produce survival trees rely on heuristic (or greedy) algorithms, which risk producing sub-optimal models. We present a dynamic-programming-with-bounds approach that finds provably-optimal sparse survival tree models, frequently in only a few seconds. Rui Zhang 0121, Rui Xin 0002, Margo I. Seltzer, Cynthia Rudin |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2024 | FastSurvival: Hidden Computational Blessings in Training Cox Proportional Hazards ModelsabstractSurvival analysis is an important research topic with applications in healthcare, business, and manufacturing. One essential tool in this area is the Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model, which is widely used for its interpretability, flexibility, and predictive performance. However, for modern data science challenges such as high dimensionality (both $n$ and $p$) and high feature correlations, current algorithms to train the CPH model have drawbacks, preventing us from using the CPH model at its full potential. The root cause is that the current algorithms, based on the Newton method, have trouble converging due to vanishing second order derivatives when outside the local region of the minimizer. To circumvent this problem, we propose new optimization methods by constructing and minimizing surrogate functions that exploit hidden mathematical structures of the CPH model. Our new methods are easy to implement and ensure monotonic loss decrease and global convergence. Empirically, we verify the computational efficiency of our methods. As a direct application, we show how our optimization methods can be used to solve the cardinality-constrained CPH problem, producing very sparse high-quality models that were not previously practical to construct. We list several extensions that our breakthrough enables, including optimization opportunities, theoretical questions on CPH's mathematical structure, as well as other CPH-related applications. Jiachang Liu 0001, Rui Zhang 0121, Cynthia Rudin |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Optimal Sparse Regression TreesabstractRegression trees are one of the oldest forms of AI models, and their predictions can be made without a calculator, which makes them broadly useful, particularly for high-stakes applications. Within the large literature on regression trees, there has been little effort towards full provable optimization, mainly due to the computational hardness of the problem. This work proposes a dynamic-programming-with-bounds approach to the construction of provably-optimal sparse regression trees. We leverage a novel lower bound based on an optimal solution to the k-Means clustering algorithm on one dimensional data. We are often able to find optimal sparse trees in seconds, even for challenging datasets that involve large numbers of samples and highly-correlated features. Rui Zhang 0121, Rui Xin 0002, Margo I. Seltzer, Cynthia Rudin |
AAAI | 1 |