Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicolas Loeff
dblp:60/350
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Learning paradigms · 24% Image recognition and object detection · 23% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 14% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Unsupervised Segmentation of Objects using Efficient Learning · CVPR 2007 Efficient Unsupervised Learning for Localization and Detection in Object Categories · NIPS 2005 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning › graph-based semi-supervised learning
manifold regularization |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Unlabeled data improvesword prediction · ICCV 2009 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-label classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Unlabeled data improvesword prediction · ICCV 2009 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Unlabeled data improvesword prediction · ICCV 2009 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
word prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Unlabeled data improvesword prediction · ICCV 2009 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
boosting |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | ManifoldBoost: stagewise function approximation for fully-, semi- and un-supervised learning · ICML 2008 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | ManifoldBoost: stagewise function approximation for fully-, semi- and un-supervised learning · ICML 2008 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | ManifoldBoost: stagewise function approximation for fully-, semi- and un-supervised learning · ICML 2008 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
object segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Unsupervised Segmentation of Objects using Efficient Learning · CVPR 2007 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › object segmentation
unsupervised object segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Unsupervised Segmentation of Objects using Efficient Learning · CVPR 2007 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative model |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Efficient Unsupervised Learning for Localization and Detection in Object Categories · NIPS 2005 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object localization |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Efficient Unsupervised Learning for Localization and Detection in Object Categories · NIPS 2005 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot dynamics
template model |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Efficient Unsupervised Learning for Localization and Detection in Object Categories · NIPS 2005 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
matrix factorization |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Scene Discovery by Matrix Factorization · ECCV (4) 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
manifold regularization · 0.2multimodal features · 0.1clustering · 0.1multi-task learning · 0.1gradient descent · 0.1matrix factorization · 0.1gradient boosting · 0.1iterative conditional maximization · 0.1conditional random field · 0.1variational approximation · 0.1unsupervised learning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Unlabeled data improvesword predictionabstractLabeling image collections is a tedious task, especially when multiple labels have to be chosen for each image. In this paper we introduce a new framework that extends state of the art models in word prediction to incorporate information from unlabeled examples, using manifold regularization. To the best of our knowledge this is the first semi-supervised multi-task model used in vision problems. The new model can be solved using gradient descent and is fast and efficient. We show remarkable improvements for cases with few labeled examples for challenging multi-task learning problems in vision (predicting words for images and attributes for objects). Nicolas Loeff, Ali Farhadi, Ian Endres, David A. Forsyth |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2008 | Scene Discovery by Matrix Factorization
Nicolas Loeff, Ali Farhadi |
ECCV (4) | 1 |
| 2008 | ManifoldBoost: stagewise function approximation for fully-, semi- and un-supervised learningabstractWe describe a manifold learning framewor that naturally accommodates supervised learning, partially supervised learning and unsupervised clustering as particular cases. Our method chooses a function by minimizing loss subject to a manifold regularization penalty. This augmented cost is minimized using a greedy, stagewise, functional minimization procedure, as in Gradientboost. Each stage of boosting is fast and efficient. We demonstrate our approach using both radial basis function approximations and trees. The performance of our method is at the state of the art on many standard semi-supervised learning benchmarks, and we produce results for large scale datasets. Nicolas Loeff, David A. Forsyth, Deepak Ramachandran |
ICML | 1 |
| 2007 | Unsupervised Segmentation of Objects using Efficient LearningabstractWe describe an unsupervised method to segment objects detected in images using a novel variant of an interest point template, which is very efficient to train and evaluate. Once an object has been detected, our method segments an image using a conditional random field (CRF) model. This model integrates image gradients, the location and scale of the object, the presence of object parts, and the tendency of these parts to have characteristic patterns of edges nearby. We enhance our method using multiple unsegmented images of objects to learn the parameters of the CRF, in an iterative conditional maximization framework. We show quantitative results on images of real scenes that demonstrate the accuracy of segmentation. Himanshu Arora, Nicolas Loeff, David A. Forsyth, Narendra Ahuja |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2006 | Discriminating Image Senses by Clustering with Multimodal Features
Nicolas Loeff, Cecilia O. Alm, David A. Forsyth |
ACL | 1 |
| 2005 | Efficient Unsupervised Learning for Localization and Detection in Object CategoriesabstractWe describe a novel method for learning templates for recognition and localization of objects drawn from categories. A generative model repre- sents the configuration of multiple object parts with respect to an object coordinate system; these parts in turn generate image features. The com- plexity of the model in the number of features is low, meaning our model is much more efficient to train than comparative methods. Moreover, a variational approximation is introduced that allows learning to be or- ders of magnitude faster than previous approaches while incorporating many more features. This results in both accuracy and localization im- provements. Our model has been carefully tested on standard datasets; we compare with a number of recent template models. In particular, we demonstrate state-of-the-art results for detection and localization. Nicolas Loeff, Himanshu Arora, Alexander Sorokin, David A. Forsyth |
NIPS | 1 |