Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Orna Lichtenstein
dblp:60/6082
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 73% Logic in computer science · 27% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking
decision procedures |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Explicit Clock Temporal Logic · LICS 1990 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Explicit Clock Temporal Logic · LICS 1990 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
real-time model checking |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Explicit Clock Temporal Logic · LICS 1990 |
Logic in computer science › temporal logic
real-time temporal logic |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Explicit Clock Temporal Logic · LICS 1990 |
Logic in computer science
temporal logic |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Explicit Clock Temporal Logic · LICS 1990 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › automated reasoning
validity problem |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Explicit Clock Temporal Logic · LICS 1990 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › program verification › verification of concurrent systems
finite-state concurrent systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | Checking That Finite State Concurrent Programs Satisfy Their Linear Specification · POPL 1985 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking › temporal logic model checking
LTL model checking |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | Checking That Finite State Concurrent Programs Satisfy Their Linear Specification · POPL 1985 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
expressive power comparison · 0.0fair computation semantics · 0.0linear-time temporal logic · 0.0linear time temporal logic · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | Explicit Clock Temporal LogicabstractThe authors present a single exponent decision procedure for the validity of XCTL formulas, and a double exponent decision procedure for the validity of XCTL formulas over finite state programs (model checking). The expressive power of XCTL is compared with that of some other logics proposed for the expression of real time properties. It is shown that it is incomparable with the expressive power of the recently proposed logic TPTL (timed propositional temporal logic).> Eyal Harel, Orna Lichtenstein, Amir Pnueli |
LICS | 2 |
| 1985 | Checking That Finite State Concurrent Programs Satisfy Their Linear SpecificationabstractWe present an algorithm for checking satisfiability of a linear time temporal logic formula over a finite state concurrent program. The running time of the algorithm is exponential in the size of the formula but linear in the size of the checked program. The algorithm yields also a formal proof in case the formula is valid over the program. The algorithm has four versions that check satisfiability by unrestricted, impartial, just and fair computations of the given program. Orna Lichtenstein, Amir Pnueli |
POPL | 1 |