VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jan Funke
dblp:60/9514
· DBLP profile ↗
15ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-4388-7783ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 13 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 7 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 58% Deep learning architectures and training · 28% 3D vision · 11% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
instance segmentation |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Unsupervised Learning of Object-Centric Embeddings for Cell Instance Segmentation in Microscopy Images · ICCV 2023 How Shift Equivariance Impacts Metric Learning for Instance Segmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Model Based Inference of Synaptic Plasticity Rules · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › instance segmentation
cell instance segmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Unsupervised Learning of Object-Centric Embeddings for Cell Instance Segmentation in Microscopy Images · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | How Shift Equivariance Impacts Metric Learning for Instance Segmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
shift equivariance |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | How Shift Equivariance Impacts Metric Learning for Instance Segmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Large Scale Image Segmentation with Structured Loss Based Deep Learning for Connectome Reconstruction · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › biomedical image segmentation
neuron segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Large Scale Image Segmentation with Structured Loss Based Deep Learning for Connectome Reconstruction · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Accurate and Linear Time Pose Estimation from Points and Lines · ECCV (7) 2016 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
multilayer perceptron |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Model Based Inference of Synaptic Plasticity Rules · NeurIPS 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics › bioimage analysis
microscopy image analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Unsupervised Learning of Object-Centric Embeddings for Cell Instance Segmentation in Microscopy Images · ICCV 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Efficient automatic 3D-reconstruction of branching neurons from EM data · CVPR 2012 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › combinatorial optimization
integer linear programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Efficient automatic 3D-reconstruction of branching neurons from EM data · CVPR 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
connectomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Efficient automatic 3D-reconstruction of branching neurons from EM data · CVPR 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural biology
electron microscopy |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Efficient automatic 3D-reconstruction of branching neurons from EM data · CVPR 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › computational neuroanatomy
neuron reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Efficient automatic 3D-reconstruction of branching neurons from EM data · CVPR 2012 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › point cloud processing › geometric feature extraction
point and line features |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Accurate and Linear Time Pose Estimation from Points and Lines · ECCV (7) 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
truncated taylor series · 1.5gradient descent · 1.5spatial offset prediction · 1.3self-supervised learning · 1.3region agglomeration · 0.8multilayer perceptron · 0.8multi-layer perceptron · 0.8affinity prediction · 0.83d u-net · 0.8formal analysis · 0.5encoder-decoder network · 0.5structured loss · 0.4integer linear programming · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Model Based Inference of Synaptic Plasticity RulesabstractInferring the synaptic plasticity rules that govern learning in the brain is a key challenge in neuroscience. We present a novel computational method to infer these rules from experimental data, applicable to both neural and behavioral data. Our approach approximates plasticity rules using a parameterized function, employing either truncated Taylor series for theoretical interpretability or multilayer perceptrons. These plasticity parameters are optimized via gradient descent over entire trajectories to align closely with observed neural activity or behavioral learning dynamics. This method can uncover complex rules that induce long nonlinear time dependencies, particularly involving factors like postsynaptic activity and current synaptic weights. We validate our approach through simulations, successfully recovering established rules such as Oja's, as well as more intricate plasticity rules with reward-modulated terms. We assess the robustness of our technique to noise and apply it to behavioral data from \textit{Drosophila} in a probabilistic reward-learning experiment. Notably, our findings reveal an active forgetting component in reward learning in flies, improving predictive accuracy over previous models. This modeling framework offers a promising new avenue for elucidating the computational principles of synaptic plasticity and learning in the brain. Yash Mehta, Danil Tyulmankov, Adithya Rajagopalan, Glenn Turner, James Fitzgerald, Jan Funke |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2023 | Unsupervised Learning of Object-Centric Embeddings for Cell Instance Segmentation in Microscopy ImagesabstractSegmentation of objects in microscopy images is required for many biomedical applications. We introduce object-centric embeddings (OCEs), which embed image patches such that the spatial offsets between patches cropped from the same object are preserved. Those learnt embeddings can be used to delineate individual objects and thus obtain instance segmentations. Here, we show theoretically that, under assumptions commonly found in microscopy images, OCEs can be learnt through a self-supervised task that predicts the spatial offset between image patches. Together, this forms an unsupervised cell instance segmentation method which we evaluate on nine diverse large-scale microscopy datasets. Segmentations obtained with our method lead to substantially improved results, compared to state-of-the-art baselines on six out of nine datasets, and perform on par on the remaining three datasets. If ground-truth annotations are available, our method serves as an excellent starting point for supervised training, reducing the required amount of ground-truth needed by one order of magnitude, thus substantially increasing the practical applicability of our method. Source code is available at github.com/funkelab/cellulus. Steffen Wolf 0001, Manan Lalit, Katie McDole, Jan Funke |
ICCV | 4 |
| 2022 | Tracking by Weakly-Supervised Learning and Graph Optimization for Whole-Embryo C. elegans lineages
Peter Hirsch 0001, Caroline Malin-Mayor, Anthony Santella, Stephan Preibisch, Dagmar Kainmüller, Jan Funke |
MICCAI (4) | 6 |
| 2021 | How Shift Equivariance Impacts Metric Learning for Instance SegmentationabstractMetric learning has received conflicting assessments concerning its suitability for solving instance segmentation tasks. It has been dismissed as theoretically flawed due to the shift equivariance of the employed CNNs and their respective inability to distinguish same-looking objects. Yet it has been shown to yield state of the art results for a variety of tasks, and practical issues have mainly been reported in the context of tile-and-stitch approaches, where discontinuities at tile boundaries have been observed. To date, neither of the reported issues have undergone thorough formal analysis. In our work, we contribute a comprehensive formal analysis of the shift equivariance properties of encoder-decoder-style CNNs, which yields a clear picture of what can and cannot be achieved with metric learning in the face of same-looking objects. In particular, we prove that a standard encoder-decoder network that takes d-dimensional images as input, with l pooling layers and pooling factor f, has the capacity to distinguish at most fdlsame-looking objects, and we show that this upper limit can be reached. Furthermore, we show that to avoid discontinuities in a tile-and-stitch approach, assuming standard batch size 1, it is necessary to employ valid convolutions in combination with a training output window size strictly greater than fl, while at test-time it is necessary to crop tiles to size n • flbefore stitching, with n ≥ 1. We complement these theoretical findings by discussing a number of insightful special cases for which we show empirical results on synthetic and real data.Code:https://github.com/Kainmueller-Lab/shift_equivariance_unet Josef Lorenz Rumberger, Peter Hirsch 0001, Melanie Dohmen, Vanessa Emanuela Guarino, Ashkan Mokarian, Lisa Mais, Jan Funke, Dagmar Kainmüller |
ICCV | 8 |
| 2020 | Inpainting Networks Learn to Separate Cells in Microscopy Images
Steffen Wolf 0001, Fred A. Hamprecht, Jan Funke |
BMVC | 3 |
| 2020 | Microtubule Tracking in Electron Microscopy Volumes
Nils Eckstein, Julia M. Buhmann, Matthew Cook 0001, Jan Funke |
MICCAI (5) | 4 |
| 2019 | Large Scale Image Segmentation with Structured Loss Based Deep Learning for Connectome ReconstructionabstractWe present a method combining affinity prediction with region agglomeration, which improves significantly upon the state of the art of neuron segmentation from electron microscopy (EM) in accuracy and scalability. Our method consists of a 3D U-Net, trained to predict affinities between voxels, followed by iterative region agglomeration. We train using a structured loss based on Malis, encouraging topologically correct segmentations obtained from affinity thresholding. Our extension consists of two parts: First, we present a quasi-linear method to compute the loss gradient, improving over the original quadratic algorithm. Second, we compute the gradient in two separate passes to avoid spurious gradient contributions in early training stages. Our predictions are accurate enough that simple learning-free percentile-based agglomeration outperforms more involved methods used earlier on inferior predictions. We present results on three diverse EM datasets, achieving relative improvements over previous results of 27, 15, and 250 percent. Our findings suggest that a single method can be applied to both nearly isotropic block-face EM data and anisotropic serial sectioned EM data. The runtime of our method scales linearly with the size of the volume and achieves a throughput of $\sim$∼ 2.6 seconds per megavoxel, qualifying our method for the processing of very large datasets. Jan Funke, Fabian Tschopp, William Grisaitis, Arlo Sheridan, Chandan Singh, Stephan Saalfeld, Srinivas C. Turaga |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2018 | Synaptic Partner Prediction from Point Annotations in Insect Brains
Julia M. Buhmann, Renate Krause, Rodrigo Ceballos Lentini, Nils Eckstein, Matthew Cook 0001, Srinivas C. Turaga, Jan Funke |
MICCAI (2) | 7 |
| 2018 | Synaptic Cleft Segmentation in Non-isotropic Volume Electron Microscopy of the Complete Drosophila Brain
Larissa Heinrich, Jan Funke, Constantin Pape, Juan Nunez-Iglesias, Stephan Saalfeld |
MICCAI (2) | 2 |
| 2016 | Accurate and Linear Time Pose Estimation from Points and Lines
Alexander Vakhitov, Jan Funke, Francesc Moreno-Noguer |
ECCV (7) | 2 |
| 2015 | Learning to Segment: Training Hierarchical Segmentation under a Topological Loss
Jan Funke, Fred A. Hamprecht, Chong Zhang 0001 |
MICCAI (3) | 1 |
| 2015 | Who Is Talking to Whom: Synaptic Partner Detection in Anisotropic Volumes of Insect Brain
Anna Kreshuk, Jan Funke, Albert Cardona, Fred A. Hamprecht |
MICCAI (1) | 2 |
| 2014 | Candidate Sampling for Neuron Reconstruction from Anisotropic Electron Microscopy Volumes
Jan Funke, Julien N. P. Martel, Stephan Gerhard, Bjoern Andres, Dan C. Ciresan, Alessandro Giusti, Luca Maria Gambardella, Jürgen Schmidhuber, Hanspeter Pfister, Albert Cardona, Matthew Cook 0001 |
MICCAI (1) | 1 |
| 2012 | Efficient automatic 3D-reconstruction of branching neurons from EM dataabstractWe present an approach for the automatic reconstruction of neurons from 3D stacks of electron microscopy sections. The core of our system is a set of possible assignments, each of which proposes with some cost a link between neuron regions in consecutive sections. These can model the continuation, branching, and end of neurons. The costs are trainable on positive assignment samples. An optimal and consistent set of assignments is found for the whole volume at once by solving an integer linear program. This set of assignments determines both the segmentation into neuron regions and the correspondence between such regions in neighboring slices. For each picked assignment, a confidence value helps to prioritize decisions to be reviewed by a human expert. We evaluate the performance of our method on an annotated volume of neural tissue and compare to the current state of the art [26]. Our method is superior in accuracy and can be trained using a small number of samples. The observed inference times are linear with about 2 milliseconds per neuron and section. Jan Funke, Bjoern Andres, Fred A. Hamprecht, Albert Cardona, Matthew Cook 0001 |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2009 | A Framework For Evaluating Visual SLAMabstractPerformance analysis in the field of camera-based simultaneous localisation and mapping (Visual SLAM, VSLAM) is still an unsolved problem. For VSLAM systems, there is a lack of generally accepted performance measures, test frameworks, and benchmark problems. Most researchers test by visually inspecting their systems on recorded image sequences, or measuring accuracy on simulated data of simplified point-cloud-like environments. Both approaches have their disadvantages. Recorded sequences lack ground truth. Simulations tend to oversimplify low-level aspects of the problem. In this paper, we propose to evaluate VSLAM systems on rendered image sequences. The intention is to move simulations towards more realistic conditions while still having ground truth. For this purpose, we provide a complete and extensible framework which addresses all aspects, from rendering to ground truth generation and automated evaluation. To illustrate the usefulness of this framework, we provide experimental results assessing the benefit of feature normal estimation and subpixel accurate matching on sequences with and without motion blur. Tobias Pietzsch, Jan Funke |
BMVC | 2 |