Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
G. Dinesh
dblp:61/10432
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel learning
multiple kernel learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | On the Algorithmics and Applications of a Mixed-norm based Kernel Learning Formulation · NIPS 2009 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
nonsmooth convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | On the Algorithmics and Applications of a Mixed-norm based Kernel Learning Formulation · NIPS 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mirror descent · 0.2l1/l-infinity regularization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | On the Algorithmics and Applications of a Mixed-norm based Kernel Learning FormulationabstractMotivated from real world problems, like object categorization, we study a particular mixed-norm regularization for Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL). It is assumed that the given set of kernels are grouped into distinct components where each component is crucial for the learning task at hand. The formulation hence employs $l_\infty$ regularization for promoting combinations at the component level and $l_1$ regularization for promoting sparsity among kernels in each component. While previous attempts have formulated this as a non-convex problem, the formulation given here is an instance of non-smooth convex optimization problem which admits an efficient Mirror-Descent (MD) based procedure. The MD procedure optimizes over product of simplexes, which is not a well-studied case in literature. Results on real-world datasets show that the new MKL formulation is well-suited for object categorization tasks and that the MD based algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art MKL solvers like \texttt{simpleMKL} in terms of computational effort. Saketha Nath Jagarlapudi, G. Dinesh, Raman Sankaran, Chiranjib Bhattacharyya, Aharon Ben-Tal, K. R. Ramakrishnan |
NIPS | 2 |