Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

G. Dinesh

dblp:61/10432 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel learning
multiple kernel learning
0.112009
On the Algorithmics and Applications of a Mixed-norm based Kernel Learning Formulation · NIPS 2009
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
nonsmooth convex optimization
0.112009
On the Algorithmics and Applications of a Mixed-norm based Kernel Learning Formulation · NIPS 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mirror descent · 0.2l1/l-infinity regularization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 On the Algorithmics and Applications of a Mixed-norm based Kernel Learning Formulation
abstract
Motivated from real world problems, like object categorization, we study a particular mixed-norm regularization for Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL). It is assumed that the given set of kernels are grouped into distinct components where each component is crucial for the learning task at hand. The formulation hence employs $l_\infty$ regularization for promoting combinations at the component level and $l_1$ regularization for promoting sparsity among kernels in each component. While previous attempts have formulated this as a non-convex problem, the formulation given here is an instance of non-smooth convex optimization problem which admits an efficient Mirror-Descent (MD) based procedure. The MD procedure optimizes over product of simplexes, which is not a well-studied case in literature. Results on real-world datasets show that the new MKL formulation is well-suited for object categorization tasks and that the MD based algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art MKL solvers like \texttt{simpleMKL} in terms of computational effort.
Saketha Nath Jagarlapudi, G. Dinesh, Raman Sankaran, Chiranjib Bhattacharyya, Aharon Ben-Tal, K. R. Ramakrishnan
NIPS2