Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alastair Philip Moore
dblp:61/1116
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers |
Image and video processing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 80% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing
image segmentation |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | "Lattice Cut" - Constructing superpixels using layer constraints · CVPR 2010 Superpixel lattices · CVPR 2008 |
Image and video processing › image segmentation › superpixel segmentation
superpixel lattice |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | "Lattice Cut" - Constructing superpixels using layer constraints · CVPR 2010 Superpixel lattices · CVPR 2008 |
Image and video processing › image segmentation
superpixel segmentation |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | "Lattice Cut" - Constructing superpixels using layer constraints · CVPR 2010 Superpixel lattices · CVPR 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Epitomized priors for multi-labeling problems · CVPR 2009 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
multi-label segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Epitomized priors for multi-labeling problems · CVPR 2009 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Epitomized priors for multi-labeling problems · CVPR 2009 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
segmentation evaluation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Scene shape priors for superpixel segmentation · ICCV 2009 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation › region-based segmentation
superpixel segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Scene shape priors for superpixel segmentation · ICCV 2009 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Epitomized priors for multi-labeling problems · CVPR 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph cuts · 0.2tree-structured belief network · 0.2epitome · 0.2EM algorithm · 0.2probabilistic spatial density model · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | "Lattice Cut" - Constructing superpixels using layer constraintsabstractUnsupervised over-segmentation of an image into super-pixels is a common preprocessing step for image parsing algorithms. Superpixels are used as both regions of support for feature vectors and as a starting point for the final segmentation. Recent algorithms that construct superpixels that conform to a regular grid (or superpixel lattice) have used greedy solutions. In this paper we show that we can construct a globally optimal solution in either the horizontal or vertical direction using a single graph cut. The solution takes into account both edges in the image, and the coherence of the resulting superpixel regions. We show that our method outperforms existing algorithms for computing superpixel lattices. Additionally, we show that performance can be comparable or better than other contemporary segmentation algorithms which are not constrained to produce a lattice. Alastair Philip Moore, Simon Prince, Jonathan Warrell |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2009 | Vistas: Hierarchial Boundary priors using Multiscale Conditional Random FieldsabstractBoundary detection is a fundamental problem in computer vision. However, bound-ary detection is difficult as it involves integrating multiple cues (intensity, color, texture) as well as trying to incorporate object class or scene level descriptions to mitigate the am-biguity of the local signal. In this paper we investigate incorporating a priori information into boundary detection. We learn a probabilistic model that describes a prior for object boundaries over small patches of the image. We then incorporate this boundary model into a mixture of multiscale conditional random fields, where the mixture components represent different contexts formed by clustering overall spatial distributions of bound-aries across images and image regions (vistas). We demonstrate this approach using challenging real-world road scenes. Importantly, we show that recent spectral methods that have been used in state-of-the-art boundary detection algorithms do not generalize well to these complex scenes. We show that our algorithm successfully learns these boundary distributions and can exploit this knowledge to improve state-of-the-art bound-ary detectors. 1 Jonathan Warrell, Alastair Philip Moore, Simon Prince |
BMVC | 2 |
| 2009 | Epitomized priors for multi-labeling problemsabstractImage parsing remains difficult due to the need to combine local and contextual information when labeling a scene. We approach this problem by using the epitome as a prior over label configurations. Several properties make it suited to this task. First, it allows a condensed patch-based representation. Second, efficient E-M based learning and inference algorithms can be used. Third, non-stationarity is easily incorporated. We consider three existing priors, and show how each can be extended using the epitome. The simplest prior assumes patches of labels are drawn independently from either a mixture model or an epitome. Next we investigate a `conditional epitome' model, which substitutes an epitome for a conditional mixture model. Finally, we develop an `epitome tree' model, which combines the epitome with a tree structured belief network prior. Each model is combined with a per-pixel classifier to perform segmentation. In each case, the epitomized form of the prior provides superior segmentation performance, with the epitome tree performing best overall. We also apply the same models to denoising binary images, with similar results. Jonathan Warrell, Simon Prince, Alastair Philip Moore |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2009 | Scene shape priors for superpixel segmentationabstractUnsupervised over-segmentation of an image into super-pixels is a common preprocessing step for image parsing algorithms. Superpixels are used as both regions of support for feature vectors and as a starting point for the final segmentation. In this paper we investigate incorporating a priori information into superpixel segmentations. We learn a probabilistic model that describes the spatial density of the object boundaries in the image. We then describe an over-segmentation algorithm that partitions this density roughly equally between superpixels whilst still attempting to capture local object boundaries. We demonstrate this approach using road scenes where objects in the center of the image tend to be more distant and smaller than those at the edge. We show that our algorithm successfully learns this foveated spatial distribution and can exploit this knowledge to improve the segmentation. Lastly, we introduce a new metric for evaluating vision labeling problems. We measure performance on a challenging real-world dataset and illustrate the limitations of conventional evaluation metrics. Alastair Philip Moore, Simon Prince, Jonathan Warrell, Umar Mohammed, Graham Jones |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2008 | Superpixel latticesabstractUnsupervised over-segmentation of an image into superpixels is a common preprocessing step for image parsing algorithms. Ideally, every pixel within each superpixel region will belong to the same real-world object. Existing algorithms generate superpixels that forfeit many useful properties of the regular topology of the original pixels: for example, the nth superpixel has no consistent position or relationship with its neighbors. We propose a novel algorithm that produces superpixels that are forced to conform to a grid (a regular superpixel lattice). Despite this added topological constraint, our algorithm is comparable in terms of speed and accuracy to alternative segmentation approaches. To demonstrate this, we use evaluation metrics based on (i) image reconstruction (ii) comparison to human-segmented images and (iii) stability of segmentation over subsequent frames of video sequences. Alastair Philip Moore, Simon Prince, Jonathan Warrell, Umar Mohammed, Graham Jones |
CVPR | 1 |