Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yuefen Wang

dblp:61/1447 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › text mining
sentiment analysis
0.112008
Combining learn-based and lexicon-based techniques for sentiment detection without using labeled examples · SIGIR 2008
Data mining › text mining › sentiment analysis
sentiment classification
0.112008
Combining learn-based and lexicon-based techniques for sentiment detection without using labeled examples · SIGIR 2008
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
error-correcting output codes
0.112007
Combining error-correcting output codes and model-refinement for text categorization · SIGIR 2007
Data mining › text mining
text classification
0.112007
Combining error-correcting output codes and model-refinement for text categorization · SIGIR 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-supervised learning · 0.1lexicon-based labeling · 0.1model refinement · 0.1error-correcting output codes · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Directed collaboration patterns in funded teams: A perspective of knowledge flow
Bentao Zou, Yuefen Wang, Chee Keong Kwoh 0001, Yonghua Cen
Inf. Process. Manag.2
2011 Weighted SCL model for adaptation of sentiment classification
Songbo Tan, Yuefen Wang
Expert Syst. Appl.2
2011 Adapting centroid classifier for document categorization
Songbo Tan, Yuefen Wang
Expert Syst. Appl.2
2009 Adapting Naive Bayes to Domain Adaptation for Sentiment Analysis
Songbo Tan, Xueqi Cheng 0001, Yuefen Wang
ECIR3
2008 Combining learn-based and lexicon-based techniques for sentiment detection without using labeled examples
abstract
In this work, we propose a novel scheme for sentiment classification (without labeled examples) which combines the strengths of both "learn-based" and "lexicon-based" approaches as follows: we first use a lexicon-based technique to label a portion of informative examples from given task (or domain); then learn a new supervised classifier based on these labeled ones; finally apply this classifier to the task. The experimental results indicate that proposed scheme could dramatically outperform "learn-based" and "lexicon-based" techniques.
Songbo Tan, Yuefen Wang, Xueqi Cheng 0001
SIGIR2
2007 Combining error-correcting output codes and model-refinement for text categorization
abstract
In this work, we explore the use of error-correcting output codes (ECOC) to enhance the performance of centroid text classifier. The framework is to decompose one multi-class problem into multiple binary problems and then learn the individual binary classification problems by centroid classifier. However, this kind of decomposition incurs considerable bias for centroid classifier, which results in noticeable degradation of performance. To address this issue, we use Model-Refinement to adjust this so-called bias.
Songbo Tan, Yuefen Wang
SIGIR2
2007 Text Feature Ranking Based on Rough-set Theory
abstract
With the aim to reduce the dimensionality without sacrificing classification performance, the author gains insights from attribute reduction based on discernibility matrix in rough-set theory and proposes two text feature selection algorithms, i.e., DB1 and DB2. The experimental results indicate that DB2 not only yields much higher accuracy than information gain when the number of features is smaller than 6000, but also incurs much smaller CPU time than information gain.
Songbo Tan, Yuefen Wang, Xueqi Cheng 0001
Web Intelligence2