VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amir Navot
dblp:61/4422
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Learning theory · 58% Representation and self-supervised learning · 19% Efficient and distributed learning · 12% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 68% Computational geometry · 18% Algorithms and data structures · 14% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.1 | 2 | 2004 | Margin based feature selection - theory and algorithms · ICML 2004 Margin Analysis of the LVQ Algorithm · NIPS 2002 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
large-scale learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Query by Committee Made Real · NIPS 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Nearest Neighbor Based Feature Selection for Regression and its Application to Neural Activity · NIPS 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
neural activity analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Nearest Neighbor Based Feature Selection for Regression and its Application to Neural Activity · NIPS 2005 |
Mathematical optimization › sparse learning
feature selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Nearest Neighbor Based Feature Selection for Regression and its Application to Neural Activity · NIPS 2005 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical decision theory
bayes risk |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Bayes and Tukey Meet at the Center Point · COLT 2004 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Margin based feature selection - theory and algorithms · ICML 2004 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
margin-based feature selection |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Margin based feature selection - theory and algorithms · ICML 2004 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
margin theory |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Margin based feature selection - theory and algorithms · ICML 2004 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Bayes and Tukey Meet at the Center Point · COLT 2004 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › prototype learning
learning vector quantization |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Margin Analysis of the LVQ Algorithm · NIPS 2002 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
margin bounds |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Margin Analysis of the LVQ Algorithm · NIPS 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
motor cortex decoding |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Nearest Neighbor Based Feature Selection for Regression and its Application to Neural Activity · NIPS 2005 |
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Margin based feature selection - theory and algorithms · ICML 2004 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
multiclass classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Margin based feature selection - theory and algorithms · ICML 2004 |
Computational geometry › combinatorial geometry
centerpoint |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Bayes and Tukey Meet at the Center Point · COLT 2004 |
Algorithms and data structures › classification
nearest neighbor classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Margin Analysis of the LVQ Algorithm · NIPS 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
leave-one-out error · 0.1k-nearest neighbor · 0.1tukey depth · 0.1relief algorithm · 0.1margin criterion · 0.1gradient ascent · 0.1bayes decision theory · 0.1prototype selection · 0.1large margin training · 0.1low-dimensional projection · 0.1kernel methods · 0.1hit-and-run random walk · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Query by Committee Made RealabstractTraining a learning algorithm is a costly task. A major goal of active learning is to reduce this cost. In this paper we introduce a new algorithm, KQBC, which is capable of actively learning large scale problems by using selective sampling. The algorithm overcomes the costly sampling step of the well known Query By Committee (QBC) algorithm by projecting onto a low dimensional space. KQBC also enables the use of kernels, providing a simple way of extending QBC to the non-linear scenario. Sampling the low dimension space is done using the hit and run random walk. We demonstrate the success of this novel algorithm by applying it to both artificial and a real world problems. Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Amir Navot, Naftali Tishby |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2005 | Nearest Neighbor Based Feature Selection for Regression and its Application to Neural ActivityabstractWe present a non-linear, simple, yet effective, feature subset selection method for regression and use it in analyzing cortical neural activity. Our algorithm involves a feature-weighted version of the k-nearest-neighbor algorithm. It is able to capture complex dependency of the target func- tion on its input and makes use of the leave-one-out error as a natural regularization. We explain the characteristics of our algorithm on syn- thetic problems and use it in the context of predicting hand velocity from spikes recorded in motor cortex of a behaving monkey. By applying fea- ture selection we are able to improve prediction quality and suggest a novel way of exploring neural data. Amir Navot, Lavi Shpigelman, Naftali Tishby, Eilon Vaadia |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2004 | Bayes and Tukey Meet at the Center Point
Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Amir Navot, Naftali Tishby |
COLT | 2 |
| 2004 | Margin based feature selection - theory and algorithmsabstractFeature selection is the task of choosing a small set out of a given set of features that capture the relevant properties of the data. In the context of supervised classification problems the relevance is determined by the given labels on the training data. A good choice of features is a key for building compact and accurate classifiers. In this paper we introduce a margin based feature selection criterion and apply it to measure the quality of sets of features. Using margins we devise novel selection algorithms for multi-class classification problems and provide theoretical generalization bound. We also study the well known Relief algorithm and show that it resembles a gradient ascent over our margin criterion. We apply our new algorithm to various datasets and show that our new Simba algorithm, which directly optimizes the margin, outperforms Relief. Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Amir Navot, Naftali Tishby |
ICML | 2 |
| 2002 | Margin Analysis of the LVQ AlgorithmabstractPrototypes based algorithms are commonly used to reduce the computa- tional complexity of Nearest-Neighbour (NN) classifiers. In this paper we discuss theoretical and algorithmical aspects of such algorithms. On the theory side, we present margin based generalization bounds that sug- gest that these kinds of classifiers can be more accurate then the 1-NN rule. Furthermore, we derived a training algorithm that selects a good set of prototypes using large margin principles. We also show that the 20 years old Learning Vector Quantization (LVQ) algorithm emerges natu- rally from our framework. Koby Crammer, Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Amir Navot, Naftali Tishby |
NIPS | 3 |