Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel B. Lysak
dblp:61/4586
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Geometric modeling and processing
3d reconstruction |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Interpreting the views in an engineering drawing · CVPR 1993 |
Geometric modeling and processing › spatial reasoning › geometric reasoning › line drawing interpretation
engineering drawing analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Interpreting the views in an engineering drawing · CVPR 1993 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
coordinate system construction · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | A complete system for the intelligent interpretation of engineering drawings
Pierre M. Devaux, Daniel B. Lysak, Rangachar Kasturi |
Int. J. Document Anal. Recognit. | 2 |
| 1995 | View labeling for automated interpretation of engineering drawings
Daniel B. Lysak, Pierre M. Devaux, Rangachar Kasturi |
Pattern Recognit. | 1 |
| 1993 | Interpreting the views in an engineering drawingabstractA method is presented for identifying the views in an engineering drawing along with their associated view points in preparation for 3D interpretation of the object shape. A formal procedure is developed for constructing a set of view-based coordinate systems that act as intermediate 2.5D coordinates to relate the 2D drawing-based coordinates to the 3D object-based coordinates. The method can accommodate auxiliary views in addition to the standard orthogonal set, and the number of views and their layout in the drawing need not be known a priori. Moderate errors in line placement and view alignment can also be accommodated.> Daniel B. Lysak, Rangachar Kasturi |
CVPR | 1 |
| 1990 | Interpretation of line drawings with multiple viewsabstractA method for interpreting engineering drawings with multiple orthogonal views is presented. The number of views required is not fixed and can range from a minimum of two to a maximum of six using a standard drawing layout. The method call handle input views with small errors or inaccuracies and still produce a valid interpretation. The solution is based on a bottom-up approach in which candidate vertices and edges are used to generate a set of possible faces which are in turn assembled into enclosures representing the final object. All possible interpretations consistent with the input views are found, and inconsistent input views are recognized by the fact that no possible consistent interpretation can be obtained.> Daniel B. Lysak, Rangachar Kasturi |
ICPR (1) | 1 |