Static analysis has profoundly improved software quality over the past decades, evolving from compiler-integrated optimizations and simple linting to sophisticated analyses for bug detection, security, and program understanding. In contrast, static analysis for hardware remains underexploited, resembling the early state of software analysis. Most existing hardware static analyses are confined to compiler optimizations and linting, lacking the sophistication needed to uncover complex design flaws. Furthermore, we observe that many hardware bugs reported in recent literature could have been identified by sophisticated static analyses that account for hardware-specific semantics and data flow; however, such bug detection analyses are absent today. To exploit the untapped potential of sophisticated hardware analysis, we present a series of bug detection analyses for Verilog, the predominant hardware description language (HDL). Moreover, these analyses are built upon our fundamental analyses that capture essential hardware-specific characteristics---such as bit-vector arithmetic, register synchronization, and digital component concurrency---and enable the examination of hardware data and control flows. Together, these analyses form a well-organized analysis suite with a modular design, in which diverse fundamental analyses combine to support bug detection, hardware understanding, and other potential clients. To implement these analyses, we further offer dedicated infrastructure, including a Verilog front end, an intermediate representation (IR) for analysis, and an analysis manager. To validate the utility of our analyses, we applied them to real-world hardware projects. Unlike software, real-world hardware projects tend to contain fewer but harder-to-detect bugs, as they typically undergo extensive simulation and rigorous verification to prevent the prohibitive costs of hardware defects. Despite this, our preliminary experimental results are highly promising: applying these proposed analyses to popular real-world Verilog projects (averaging 1.5K+ GitHub stars) uncovered nine previously unknown bugs, all confirmed by developers; moreover, we successfully identified a total of 18 bugs beyond the capabilities of existing static analyses for Verilog bug detection (i.e., linters). These results underscore the transformative potential of sophisticated static analysis in hardware design. Our analysis suite and infrastructure are also highly reusable: on average, each bug-detection client built on our analysis suite requires about 270 LoC, compared to 5,700 LoC when developed from scratch. By open-sourcing the entire system, involving substantial engineering effort (100K+ LoC), we aim to encourage further innovation and applications of sophisticated static analysis for hardware, hopefully fostering a similarly vibrant ecosystem that software analysis enjoys.

The growing demand for productivity in hardware development opens up new opportunities for applying programming language (PL) techniques to hardware description languages (HDLs). Chisel, a leading agile HDL, embraces this shift by leveraging modern PL features to enhance hardware design productivity. However, verification for Chisel remains a major productivity bottleneck, requiring substantial time and manual effort. To address this issue, we advocate the use of static analysis —a technique proven well-suited to agile development workflows in software—for lightweight Chisel verification. This work establishes a theoretical foundation for Chisel static analysis. At its core is λ C , a formal core calculus of ChAIR (a Chisel-specific intermediate representation for analysis). λ C is the first formalism that captures the essence of Chisel while being deliberately minimal to ease rigorous reasoning about static analysis built on λ C . We prove key properties of λ C that reflect real hardware characteristics, which in turn offer a form of retrospective validation for its design. On the basis of λ C , we define and formalize the hardware value flow analysis (HVFA) problem, which underpins our static analyses for critical Chisel verification tasks, including bug detection and security analysis. We then propose a synchronized fixed-point solution to the HVFA problem, featuring hardware-specific treatment of the synchronous behavior of clock-driven hardware registers—the essential feature of Chisel programs. We further prove key theorems establishing the guarantees and limitations of our solution. As a proof of concept, we develop ChiSA (30K+ LoC)—the first Chisel static analyzer that can analyze intricate hardware value flows to enable lightweight analyses for critical Chisel verification tasks such as bug detection and security analysis. To facilitate thorough evaluation of both ChiSA and future work, we provide ChiSABench (11M+ LoC), a comprehensive benchmark for Chisel static analysis. Our evaluation on ChiSABench demonstrates that ChiSA offers an effective and significantly more lightweight approach for critical Chisel verification tasks, especially on large and complex real-world designs. For example, ChiSA identified 69 violable developer-inserted assertions in large-scale Chisel designs (9.7M+ LoC) in under 200 seconds—eight of which were recognized by developers and scheduled for future fixes—and detected all 60 information-leak vulnerabilities in the well-known TrustHub benchmark (1.1M+ LoC) in just one second—outperforming state-of-the-art Chisel approaches like ChiselTest’s bounded model checking and ChiselFlow’s secure type system. These results underscore the high promise of static analysis for lightweight Chisel verification. To encourage continued research and innovation, we will fully open-source ChiSA (30K+ LoC) and ChiSABench (11M+ LoC).

Apart from forming the backbone of compiler optimization, static dataflow analysis has been widely applied in a vast variety of applications, such as bug detection, privacy analysis, and program comprehension. Despite its importance, performing inter-procedural dataflow analysis on large-scale programs is well-known to be challenging. In this article, we propose a novel distributed analysis framework supporting the general inter-procedural dataflow analysis. Inspired by large-scale graph processing, we devise dedicated distributed worklist algorithms for both whole-program analysis and incremental analysis. We implement these algorithms and develop a distributed framework called BigDataflow running on a large-scale cluster. The experimental results validate the promising performance of BigDataflow—BigDataflow can finish analyzing the program of million lines of code in minutes. Compared with the state-of-the-art, BigDataflow achieves much more analysis efficiency.

General frameworks such as FlowDroid, IccTA, P/Taint, Amandroid, and DroidSafe have significantly advanced the development of static analysis tools for Android security by providing fundamental facilities for them. However, while these frameworks have been instrumental in fostering progress, they often operate with inherent inefficiencies, such as redundant computations, reliance on separate tools, and unnecessary complexity, which are rarely scrutinized by the analysis tools that depend on them. This paper introduces PacDroid, a new static analysis framework for detecting security vulnerabilities in Android apps. PacDroid employs a simple yet effective pointer-analysis-centric approach that naturally manages alias information, interprocedural value propagation, and all Android features it supports (including ICC, lifecycles, and miscs), in a unified manner. Our extensive evaluation reveals that PacDroid not only outperforms state-of-the-art frameworks in achieving a superior trade-off between soundness and precision (F-measure) but also surpasses them in both analysis speed and robustness; moreover, PacDroid successfully identifies 77 real security vulnerability flows across 23 real-world Android apps that were missed by all other frameworks. With its ease of extension and provision of essential facilities, PacDroid is expected to serve as a foundational framework for various future analysis applications for Android.

Java offers the Java Native Interface (JNI), which allows programs running in the Java Virtual Machine to invoke and be manipulated by native applications and libraries written in other languages, typically C. While JNI mechanism significantly enhances the Java platform's capabilities, it also presents challenges for static analysis of Java programs due to the complex behaviors introduced by native code. Therefore, effectively resolving the interactions between Java and native code is crucial for static analysis. In this paper, we introduce JNIFER, the first interactive cross-language pointer analysis for resolving native code in Java programs. JNIFER integrates both Java and C pointer analyses, equipped with advanced native call and JNI function analyses, enabling the simultaneous analysis of both Java and native code. During the analysis of crosslanguage interactions, the two analyzers interact with each other, constructing cross-language points-to relations and call graphs, thereby approximating the runtime behavior at the interaction sites. Our evaluation shows that JNIFER outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in terms of soundness while maintaining high precision and comparable efficiency, as evidenced by extensive experiments on OpenJDK and real-world Java applications.

In static analysis frameworks for Java, the bytecode frontend serves as a critical component, transforming complex, stack-based Java bytecode into a more analyzable register-based, typed 3-address code representation. This transformation often significantly influences the overall performance of analysis frameworks, particularly when processing large-scale Java applications, rendering the efficiency of the bytecode frontend paramount for static analysis. However, the bytecode frontends of currently dominant Java static analysis frameworks, Soot and WALA, despite being time-tested and widely adopted, exhibit limitations in efficiency, hindering their ability to offer a better user experience. To tackle efficiency issues, we introduce a new bytecode frontend. Typically, bytecode frontends consist of two key stages: (1) translating Java bytecode to untyped 3-address code, and (2) performing type inference on this code. For 3-address code translation, we identified common patterns in bytecode that enable more efficient processing than traditional methods. For type inference, we found that traditional algorithms often include redundant computations that hinder performance. Leveraging these insights, we propose two novel approaches: pattern-aware 3-address code translation and pruning-based type inference, which together form our new frontend and lead to significant efficiency improvements. Besides, our approach can also generate SSA IR, enhancing its usability for various static analysis techniques. We implemented our new bytecode frontend in Tai-e, a recent state-of-the-art static analysis framework for Java, and evaluated its performance across a diverse set of Java applications. Experimental results demonstrate that our frontend significantly outperforms Soot, WALA, and SootUp (an overhaul of Soot)—in terms of efficiency, being on average 14.2×, 14.5×, and 75.2× faster than Soot, WALA, and SootUp, respectively. Moreover, additional experiments reveal that our frontend exhibits superior reliability in processing Java bytecode compared to these tools, thus providing a more robust foundation for Java static analysis.

Database-backed applications form the backbone of modern software, yet their complexity poses significant challenges for static analysis. These applications involve intricate interactions among application code, diverse database frameworks such as JDBC, Hibernate, and Spring Data JPA, and languages like Java and SQL. In this paper, we introduce DBridge, the first pointer analysis specifically designed for Java database-backed applications, capable of statically constructing comprehensive Java-to-database value flows. DBridge unifies application code analysis, database access specification modeling, SQL analysis, and database abstraction within a single pointer analysis framework, capturing interactions across a wide range of database access APIs and frameworks. Additionally, we present DB-Micro, a new micro-benchmark suite with 824 test cases crafted to systematically evaluate static analysis for database-backed applications. Experiments on DB-Micro and large, complex, real-world applications demonstrate DBridge’s effectiveness, achieving high recall and precision in building Java-to-database value flows efficiently and outperforming state-of-the-art tools in SQL statement identification. To further validate DBridge’s utility, we develop three client analyses for security and program understanding. Evaluation on these real-world applications reveals 30 Stored XSS attack vulnerabilities and 3 horizontal broken access control vulnerabilities, all previously undiscovered and real, as well as a high detection rate in impact analysis for schema changes. By open-sourcing DBridge (14K LoC) and DB-Micro (22K LoC), we seek to help advance static analysis for modern database-backed applications in the future.

Generic programming has found widespread application in object-oriented languages like Java. However, existing context-sensitive pointer analyses fail to leverage the benefits of generic programming. This paper introducesgeneric sensitivity, a new context customization scheme targeting generics. We design our context customization scheme in such a way that generic instantiation sites, i.e., locations instantiating generic classes/methods with concrete types, are always preserved as key context elements. This is realized by augmenting contexts with a type variable lookup map, which is efficiently generated in a context-sensitive manner throughout the analysis process. We have implemented various variants of generic-sensitive analysis in WALA and conducted extensive experiments to compare it with state-of-the-art approaches, including both traditional and selective context-sensitivity methods. The evaluation results demonstrate that generic sensitivity effectively enhances existing context-sensitivity approaches, striking a new balance between efficiency and precision. For instance, it enables a 1-object-sensitive analysis to achieve overall better precision compared to a 2-object-sensitive analysis, with an average speedup of 12.6 times (up to 62 times).

Static analysis is a mature field with applications to bug detection, security analysis, program understanding, optimization, and more. To facilitate these applications, static analysis frameworks play an essential role by providing a series of fundamental services such as intermediate representation (IR) generation, control flow graph construction, points-to/alias information computation, and so on. However, although static analysis has made great strides and several well-known frameworks have emerged in this field over the past decades, these frameworks are not that easy to learn and use for developers who rely on them to create and implement analyses. In that sense, it is far from trivial to build a developer-friendly static analysis framework, because compared to the knowledge required for static analysis itself, we have significantly less knowledge designing and implementing static analysis frameworks.

Abstract: Apart from forming the backbone of compiler optimization, static dataflow analysis has been widely applied in a vast variety of applications, such as bug detection, privacy analysis, program comprehension, etc. Despite its importance, performing interprocedural dataflow analysis on large-scale programs is well known to be challenging.In this paper, we propose a novel distributed analysis framework supporting the general interprocedural dataflow analysis.Inspired by large-scale graph processing, we devise a dedicated distributed worklist algorithm tailored for interprocedural dataflow analysis. We implement the algorithm and develop a distributed framework called BigDataflow running on a large-scale cluster.The experimental results validate the promising performance of BigDataflow – it can finish analyzing the program of millions lines of code in minutes. Compared with the state-of-the-art, BigDataflow achieves much more analysis efficiency.

With the increasing need to apply modern software techniques to hardware design, Verilog, the most popular Hardware Description Language (HDL), plays an infrastructure role. However, Verilog has several semantic pitfalls that often confuse software and hardware developers. Although prior research on formal semantics for Verilog exists, it is not comprehensive and has not fully addressed these issues. In this work, we present a novel scheme inspired by previous work on defining core languages for software languages like JavaScript and Python. Specifically, we define the formal semantics of Verilog using a core language called λ V , which captures the essence of Verilog using as few language structures as possible. λ V not only covers the most complete set of language features to date, but also addresses the aforementioned pitfalls. We implemented λ V with about 27,000 lines of Java code, and comprehensively tested its totality and conformance with Verilog. As a reliable reference semantics, λ V can detect semantic bugs in real-world Verilog simulators and expose ambiguities in Verilog’s standard specification. Moreover, as a useful core language, λ V has the potential to facilitate the development of tools such as a state-space explorer and a concolic execution tool for Verilog.

Over the past decades, context sensitivity has been considered as one of the most effective ideas for improving the precision of pointer analysis for Java. Different from the extremely fast context-insensitivity approach, context sensitivity requires every program method to be analyzed under different contexts for separating the static abstractions of different dynamic instantiations of the method’s variables and heap objects, and thus reducing spurious object flows introduced by method calls. However, despite great precision benefits, as each method is equivalently cloned and analyzed under each context, context sensitivity brings heavy efficiency costs. Recently, numerous selective context-sensitive approaches have been put forth for scaling pointer analysis to large and complex Java programs by applying contexts only to the selected methods while analyzing the remaining ones context-insensitively; however, because the selective approaches do not fundamentally alter the primary methodology of context sensitivity (and do not thus remove its efficiency bottleneck), they produce much improved but still limited results. In this work, we present a fundamentally different approach called Cut-Shortcut for fast and precise pointer analysis for Java. Its insight is simple: the main effect of cloning methods under different contexts is to filter spurious object flows that have been merged inside a callee method; from the view of a typical pointer flow graph (PFG), such effect can be simulated by cutting off (Cut) the edges that introduce precision loss to certain pointers and adding Shortcut edges directly from source pointers to the target ones circumventing the method on PFG. As a result, we can achieve the effect of context sensitivity without contexts. We identify three general program patterns and develop algorithms based on them to safely cut off and add shortcut edges on PFG, formalize them and formally prove the soundness. To comprehensively validate Cut-Shortcut’s effectiveness, we implement two versions of Cut-Shortcut for two state-of-the-art pointer analysis frameworks for Java, one in Datalog for the declarative Doop and the other in Java for the imperative Tai-e, and we consider all the large and complex programs used in recent literatures that meet the experimental requirements. The evaluation results are extremely promising: Cut-Shortcut is even able to run faster than context insensitivity for most evaluated programs while obtaining high precision that is comparable to context sensitivity (if scalable) in both frameworks. This is for the first time that we have been able to achieve such a good efficiency and precision trade-off for those hard-to-analyze programs, and we hope Cut-Shortcut could offer new perspectives for developing more effective pointer analysis for Java in the future.

Sophisticated static analysis techniques often have complicated implementations, much of which provides logic for tuning and scaling rather than basic analysis functionalities. This tight coupling of basic algorithms with special treatments for scalability makes an analysis implementation hard to (1) make correct, (2) understand/work with, and (3) reuse for other clients. This paper presents Chianina, a graph system we developed for fully context- and flow-sensitive analysis of large C programs. Chianina overcomes these challenges by allowing the developer to provide only the basic algorithm of an analysis and pushing the tuning/scaling work to the underlying system. Key to the success of Chianina is (1) an evolving graph formulation of flow sensitivity and (2) the leverage of out-of-core, disk support to deal with memory blowup resulting from context sensitivity. We implemented three context- and flow-sensitive analyses on top of Chianina and scaled them to large C programs like Linux (17M LoC) on a single commodity PC.

Traditional context-sensitive pointer analysis is hard to scale for large and complex Java programs. To address this issue, a series of selective context-sensitivity approaches have been proposed and exhibit promising results. In this work, we move one step further towards producing highly-precise pointer analyses for hard-to-analyze Java programs by presenting the Unity-Relay framework, which takes selective context sensitivity to the next level. Briefly, Unity-Relay is a one-two punch: given a set of different selective context-sensitivity approaches, say S = S1, . . . , Sn, Unity-Relay first provides a mechanism (called Unity)to combine and maximize the precision of all components of S. When Unity fails to scale, Unity-Relay offers a scheme (called Relay) to pass and accumulate the precision from one approach Si in S to the next, Si+1, leading to an analysis that is more precise than all approaches in S. As a proof-of-concept, we instantiate Unity-Relay into a tool called Baton and extensively evaluate it on a set of hard-to-analyze Java programs, using general precision metrics and popular clients. Compared with the state of the art, Baton achieves the best precision for all metrics and clients for all evaluated programs. The difference in precision is often dramatic — up to 71% of alias pairs reported by previously-best algorithms are found to be spurious and eliminated.

Context sensitivity is an essential technique for ensuring high precision in static analyses. It has been observed that applying context sensitivity partially, only on a select subset of the methods, can improve the balance between analysis precision and speed. However, existing techniques are based on heuristics that do not provide much insight into what characterizes this method subset. In this work, we present a more principled approach for identifying precision-critical methods, based on general patterns of value flows that explain where most of the imprecision arises in context-insensitive pointer analysis. Using this theoretical foundation, we present an efficient algorithm, Z IPPER , to recognize these flow patterns in a given program and employ context sensitivity accordingly. We also present a variant, Z IPPER e , that additionally takes into account which methods are disproportionally costly to analyze with context sensitivity. Our experimental results on standard benchmark and real-world Java programs show that Z IPPER preserves effectively all of the precision (98.8%) of a highly precise conventional context-sensitive pointer analysis (2-object-sensitive with a context-sensitive heap, 2obj for short), with a substantial speedup (on average, 3.4× and up to 9.4×), and that Z IPPER e preserves 94.7% of the precision of 2obj, with an order-of-magnitude speedup (on average, 25.5× and up to 88×). In addition, for 10 programs that cannot be analyzed by 2obj within a three-hour time limit, on average Z IPPER e can guide 2obj to finish analyzing them in less than 11 minutes with high precision compared to context-insensitive and introspective context-sensitive analyses.

Java reflection has been widely used in a variety of applications and frameworks. It allows a software system to inspect and change the behaviour of its classes, interfaces, methods, and fields at runtime, enabling the software to adapt to dynamically changing runtime environments. However, this dynamic language feature imposes significant challenges to static analysis, because the behaviour of reflection-rich software is logically complex and statically hard to predict. As a result, existing static analysis tools either ignore reflection or handle it partially, resulting in missed, important behaviours, i.e., unsound results. Therefore, improving or even achieving soundness in static reflection analysis—an analysis that infers statically the behaviour of reflective code—will provide significant benefits to many analysis clients, such as bug detectors, security analyzers, and program verifiers. In this article, we provide a comprehensive understanding of Java reflection through examining its underlying concept, API, and real-world usage, and, building on this, we introduce a new static approach to resolving Java reflection effectively in practice. We have implemented our reflection analysis in an open-source tool, called S OLAR , and evaluated its effectiveness extensively with large Java programs and libraries. Our experimental results demonstrate that S OLAR is able to (1) resolve reflection more soundly than the state-of-the-art reflection analyses; (2) automatically and accurately identify the parts of the program where reflection is resolved unsoundly or imprecisely; and (3) guide users to iteratively refine the analysis results by using lightweight annotations until their specific requirements are satisfied.

Context-sensitivity is important in pointer analysis to ensure high precision, but existing techniques suffer from unpredictable scalability. Many variants of context-sensitivity exist, and it is difficult to choose one that leads to reasonable analysis time and obtains high precision, without running the analysis multiple times.

Context sensitivity is an essential technique for ensuring high precision in Java pointer analyses. It has been observed that applying context sensitivity partially, only on a select subset of the methods, can improve the balance between analysis precision and speed. However, existing techniques are based on heuristics that do not provide much insight into what characterizes this method subset. In this work, we present a more principled approach for identifying precision-critical methods, based on general patterns of value flows that explain where most of the imprecision arises in context-insensitive pointer analysis. Accordingly, we provide an efficient algorithm to recognize these flow patterns in a given program and exploit them to yield good tradeoffs between analysis precision and speed. Our experimental results on standard benchmark and real-world programs show that a pointer analysis that applies context sensitivity partially, only on the identified precision-critical methods, preserves effectively all (98.8%) of the precision of a highly-precise conventional context-sensitive pointer analysis (2-object-sensitive with a context-sensitive heap), with a substantial speedup (on average 3.4X, and up to 9.2X).

Summary Reflection poses grave problems for static security analysis, despite its widespread use in Android apps. In general, string inference has been mainly used to handle reflection, resulting in significantly missed security vulnerabilities. In this work, we bring forward the ubiquity of incomplete information environments (IIEs) for Android apps, where some critical dataflows are missing during static analysis and the need for resolving reflective calls under IIEs. We present Ripple, the first IIE‐aware static reflection analysis for Android apps that resolves reflective calls more soundly than string inference. Validation with 17 popular Android apps from Google Play demonstrates the effectiveness of Ripple in discovering reflective targets with a low false positive rate (due to its trade‐off made among soundness, precision, and scalability). As a result, Ripple enables FlowDroid, a taint analysis for Android apps, to find hundreds of sensitive data leakages that would otherwise be missed. As a fundamental analysis, Ripple will be valuable for many security analysis clients, since more program behaviors can now be analyzed under IIEs.

Despite its widespread use in Android apps, reflection poses graving problems for static security analysis. Currently, string inference is applied to handle reflection, resulting in significantly missed security vulnerabilities. In this paper, we bring forward the ubiquity of incomplete information environments (IIEs) for Android apps, where some critical data-flows are missing during static analysis, and the need for resolving reflective calls under IIEs. We present Ripple, the first IIE-aware static reflection analysis for Android apps that resolves reflective calls more soundly than string inference. Validation with 17 popular Android apps from Google Play demonstrates the effectiveness of Ripple in discovering reflective targets with a low false positive rate. As a result, Ripple enables FlowDroid to find hundreds of sensitive data leakages that would otherwise be missed.

Reflection, which is widely used in practice and abused by many security exploits, poses a significant obstacle to program analysis. Reflective calls can be analyzed statically or dynamically. Static analysis is more sound but also more imprecise (by introducing many false reflective targets and thus affecting its scalability). Dynamic analysis can be precise but often miss many true reflective targets due to low code coverage.We introduce MIRROR, the first automatic reflection analysis for Java that increases significantly the code coverage of dynamic analysis while keeping false reflective targets low. In its static analysis, a novel reflection-oriented slicing technique is applied to identify a small number of small path-based slices for a reflective call so that different reflective targets are likely exercised along these different paths. This preserves the soundness of pure static reflection analysis as much as possible, improves its scalability, and reduces substantially its false positive rate. In its dynamic analysis, these slices are executed with automatically generated test cases to report the reflective targets accessed. This significantly improves the code coverage of pure dynamic analysis. We evaluate MIRROR against a state-of-the-art dynamic reflection analysis tool, TAMIFLEX, by using 10 large real-world Java applications. MIRROR detects 12.5% - 933.3% more reflective targets efficiently (in 362.8 seconds on average) without producing any false positives. These new targets enable 5 - 174949 callgraph edges to be reachable in the application code.

Mainstream points-to analysis techniques for object-oriented languages rely predominantly on the allocation-site abstraction to model heap objects. We present MAHJONG, a novel heap abstraction that is specifically developed to address the needs of an important class of type-dependent clients, such as call graph construction, devirtualization and may-fail casting. By merging equivalent automata representing type-consistent objects that are created by the allocation-site abstraction, MAHJONG enables an allocation-site-based points-to analysis to run significantly faster while achieving nearly the same precision for type-dependent clients.

Protocol and typestate analyses often report some sequences of statements ending at a program point P that needs to be scrutinized, since P may be erroneous or imprecisely analyzed. Program slicing focuses only on the behavior at P by computing a slice of the program affecting the values at P. In this paper, we propose to restrict our attention to the subset of that behavior at P affected by one or several statement sequences, called a sequential criterion (SC). By leveraging the ordering information in a SC, e.g., the temporal order in a few valid/invalid API method invocation sequences, we introduce a new technique, program tailoring, to compute a tailored program that comprises the statements in all possible execution paths passing through at least one sequence in SC in the given order. With a prototyping implementation, Tailor, we show why tailoring is practically useful by conducting two case studies on seven large real-world Java applications. For program debugging and understanding, Tailor can complement program slicing by removing SC-irrelevant statements. For program analysis, Tailor can enable a pointer analysis, which is unscalable to a program, to perform a more focused and therefore potentially scalable analysis to its specific parts containing hard language features such as reflection.

Andersen's pointer analysis becomes more precise when applied with full heap cloning but unscalable for large, heap-intensive programs. In contrast, k-callsite-sensitive heap cloning can be faster but less precise for some programs. In this paper, we make one step forward by enhancing Andersen's analysis with QUery-Directed Adaptive (QUDA) heap cloning for optimizing compilers. The novelty of our analysis, called QUDA, lies in performing k-callsite-sensitive heap cloning iteratively, starting with k = 0 (without heap cloning), so that an abstract heap object is cloned at iteration k = i + 1 only if some mayalias queries that are not answered positively at iteration k = i may now be answered more precisely. QUDA, which is implemented in Open64, has the same precision as the state-of-the-art, FULCRA, a version of QUDA with exhaustive heap cloning, but is significantly more scalable. For 10 SPEC2000 C benchmarks and 5 C applications (totalling 840 KLOC) evaluated, QUDA takes only 4+ minutes but exhaustive heap cloning takes 42+ minutes to complete. QUDA takes only 75.1 % of the time that Open64 takes on average to compile these 15 programs under “-O2”.

Almost every computer user has encountered an un-responsive system failure or system hang, which leaves the user no choice but to power off the computer. In this paper, the causes of such failures are analyzed in detail and one empirical hypothesis for detecting system hang is proposed. This hypothesis exploits a small set of system performance metrics provided by the OS itself, thereby avoiding modifying the OS kernel and introducing additional cost (e.g., hardware modules). Under this hypothesis, we propose SHFH, a self-healing framework to handle system hang, which can be deployed on OS dynamically. One unique feature of SHFH is that its "light-heavy" detection strategy is designed to make intelligent tradeoffs between the performance overhead and the false positive rate induced by system hang detection. Another feature is that its diagnosis-based recovery strategy offers a better granularity to recover from system hang. Our experimental results show that SHFH can cover 95.34% of system hang scenarios, with a false positive rate of 0.58% and 0.6% performance overhead, validating the effectiveness of our empirical hypothesis.