VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
T. Murphy
dblp:61/5617
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | The Cedar System and an Initial Performance Study · ISCA 1993 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › parallel system performance
multiprocessor performance evaluation |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | The Cedar System and an Initial Performance Study · ISCA 1993 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
parallel performance evaluation |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | The Cedar System and an Initial Performance Study · ISCA 1993 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking
parallel benchmark |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | The Cedar System and an Initial Performance Study · ISCA 1993 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | The Cedar System and an Initial Performance Study · ISCA 1993 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
performance measurement · 0.0benchmarking methodology · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | The Cedar System and an Initial Performance StudyabstractIn this paper, we give an overview of the Cedar multiprocessor and present recent performance results. These include the performance of some computational kernels and the Perfect Benchmarks. We also present a methodology for judging parallel system performance and apply this methodology to Cedar, Cray YMP-8, and Thinking Machines CM-5. David J. Kuck, Edward S. Davidson, Duncan H. Lawrie, Ahmed H. Sameh, Chuanqi Zhu, Alexander V. Veidenbaum, Jeff Konicek, Pen-Chung Yew, Kyle A. Gallivan, William Jalby, Harry A. G. Wijshoff, Randall Bramley, Ulrike Meier Yang, Perry A. Emrath, David A. Padua, Rudolf Eigenmann, Jay P. Hoeflinger, Greg P. Jaxon, Zhiyuan Li 0001, T. Murphy, John T. Andrews, Stephen W. Turner |
ISCA | 20 |
| 1991 | The Organization of the Cedar System
Jeff Konicek, Tracy Tilton, Alexander V. Veidenbaum, Chuanqi Zhu, Edward S. Davidson, Ruppert A. Downing, Michael J. Haney, Pen-Chung Yew, P. Michael Farmwald, David J. Kuck, Daniel M. Lavery, Robert A. Lindsey, D. Pointer, John T. Andrews, T. Murphy, Stephen W. Turner, Nancy J. Warter |
ICPP (1) | 17 |