Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James P. Fry

dblp:61/6855 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 12 · 2 first-authorComputer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers
Data models and query languages · 43% Database system architecture and tuning · 33% Data integration and cleaning · 20%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data models and query languages › schema management
database restructuring
0.021976
Restructuring for Large Data Bases: Three Levels of Abstraction · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1976
Restructuring for Large Data Bases: Three Levels of Abstraction · VLDB 1975
Data integration and cleaning
schema integration
0.011978
Towards the Support of Integrated Views of Multiple Databases: An Aggregate Schema Facility · SIGMOD Conference 1978
Data models and query languages › schema management
schema transformation
0.011976
Restructuring for Large Data Bases: Three Levels of Abstraction · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1976

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

program transformation · 0.0abstraction levels · 0.0CODASYL/DBTG schema definition · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1991 Database Management Systems: Paradigm Shift or Changing Paradigm
James P. Fry
ER1
1989 Novel applications of information retrieval to the storage and management of computer models
Michael D. Gordon, James P. Fry
Inf. Process. Manag.2
1987 E-R Modeling versus Binary Modeling (Panel)
Gordon C. Everest, Carlo Batini, James P. Fry, Leo Mark, Paul S. Thomson
ER3
1987 A practical approach to transforming extended ER diagrams into the relational model
Dongqing Yang, Toby J. Teorey, James P. Fry
Inf. Sci.3
1984 The Database Designer's Workbench
Richard E. Cobb, James P. Fry, Toby J. Teorey
Inf. Sci.2
1983 Issues in Multiple Database Environmemnts (Panel)
Yuri Breitbart, Umeshwar Dayal, James P. Fry, Witold Litwin, Amihai Motro
ER3
1979 An Approach to Designing an Entity-Relationship Schema
James P. Fry
ER1
1979 1978 New Orleans Data Base Design Workshop Report
Vincent Y. Lum, Sakti P. Ghosh, Mario Schkolnick, Robert W. Taylor, D. Jefferson, Stanley Y. W. Su, James P. Fry, Toby J. Teorey, B. Yao, D. S. Rund, Beverly K. Kahn, Shamkant B. Navathe, L. Aguilar, William J. Barr, P. E. Jones
VLDB7
1979 Database Program Conversion: A Framework for Research
Robert W. Taylor, James P. Fry, Ben Shneiderman, Diane C. P. Smith, Stanley Y. W. Su
VLDB2
1978 Towards the Support of Integrated Views of Multiple Databases: An Aggregate Schema Facility
abstract
Supporting multiple user views of databases is currently an important problem area in database management system development. An interesting facet of this problem arises whenever a user needs an integrated view of several distinct databases. Using traditional database concepts, an aggregate schema facility has been developed to address this problem. The basic functions of an aggregate schema facility are discussed, as well as their implementation in a CODASYL/DBTG-like environment. Interest in an aggregate schema facility grew out of a problem in restructuring large databases. The application of this facility to restructuring is discussed, as well as potential applications to dynamic translation and distributed databases.
Donald E. Swartwout, James P. Fry
SIGMOD Conference2
1976 Distributed Data Bases; A Summary of Research
Mark Deppe, James P. Fry
Comput. Networks2
1976 Restructuring for Large Data Bases: Three Levels of Abstraction
abstract
The development of a powerful restructuring function involves two important components—the unambiguous specification of the restructuring operations and the realization of these operations in a software system. This paper is directed to the first component in the belief that a precise specification will provide a firm foundation for the development of restructuring algorithms and, subsequently, their implementation. The paper completely defines the semantics of the restructuring of tree structured databases. The delineation of the restructuring function is accomplished by formulating three different levels of abstraction, with each level of abstraction representing successively more detailed semantics of the function. At the first level of abstraction, the schema modification, three types are identified—naming, combining, and relating; these three types are further divided into eight schema operations. The second level of abstraction, the instance operations, constitutes the transformations on the data instances; they are divided into group operations such as replication, factoring, union, etc., and group relation operations such as collapsing, refinement, fusion, etc. The final level, the item value operations, includes the actual item operations, such as copy value, delete value, or create a null value.
Shamkant B. Navathe, James P. Fry
ACM Trans. Database Syst.2
1975 Restructuring for Large Data Bases: Three Levels of Abstraction
abstract
The development of a powerful restructuring function involves two important components - the unambiguous specification of the restructuring operations and the realization of these operations in a software system. We direct our efforts to the first component in the belief that a precise specification will provide a firm foundation for restructuring algorithms and implementations. This paper defines completely the semantics of the restructuring of tree structured data bases.
Shamkant B. Navathe, James P. Fry
VLDB2