Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Kevin H. Wilson

dblp:62/3423 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-8920-7152ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Theory of computation · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Recommender systems · 82% Machine learning and data management · 18%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 77% Vision and language · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Smart cities and intelligent transportation · 77% Medical and health informatics · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
contextual bandit
0.812024
Jump Starting Bandits with LLM-Generated Prior Knowledge · EMNLP 2024
Recommender systems
cold-start recommendation
0.812024
Jump Starting Bandits with LLM-Generated Prior Knowledge · EMNLP 2024
Recommender systems
context-aware recommendation
0.812024
Jump Starting Bandits with LLM-Generated Prior Knowledge · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning and data management
predictive maintenance
0.312018
Using Machine Learning to Assess the Risk of and Prevent Water Main Breaks · KDD 2018
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual question answering
language prior
0.212024
Jump Starting Bandits with LLM-Generated Prior Knowledge · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-armed bandit · 1.5large language model prompting · 1.5machine learning · 0.7gradient-boosted decision tree · 0.3gradient boosted decision trees · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Jump Starting Bandits with LLM-Generated Prior Knowledge
abstract
We present substantial evidence demonstrating the benefits of integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with a Contextual Multi-Armed Bandit framework.Contextual bandits have been widely used in recommendation systems to generate personalized suggestions based on user-specific contexts.We show that LLMs, pre-trained on extensive corpora rich in human knowledge and preferences, can simulate human behaviours well enough to jumpstart contextual multi-armed bandits to reduce online learning regret.We propose an initialization algorithm for contextual bandits by prompting LLMs to produce a pre-training dataset of approximate human preferences for the bandit.This significantly reduces online learning regret and data-gathering costs for training such models.Our approach is validated empirically through two sets of experiments with different bandit setups: one which utilizes LLMs to serve as an oracle and a real-world experiment utilizing data from a conjoint survey experiment.
Parand A. Alamdari, Yanshuai Cao, Kevin H. Wilson
EMNLP3
2018 Using Machine Learning to Assess the Risk of and Prevent Water Main Breaks
abstract
Water infrastructure in the United States is beginning to show its age, particularly through water main breaks. Main breaks cause major disruptions in everyday life for residents and businesses. Water main failures in Syracuse, N.Y. (as in most cities) are handled reactively rather than proactively. A barrier to proactive maintenance with limited resources is the city's inability to properly prioritize the allocation of its resources. We built a Machine Learning system to assess the risk of a water mains breaking. Using historical data on which mains have failed, descriptors of pipes, and other data sources, we evaluated several models' abilities to predict breaks three years into the future. Our results show that our system using gradient boosted decision trees performed best out of several algorithms and expert heuristics, achieving precision at 1% ([email protected]) of 0.62. Our model outperforms a random baseline ([email protected] of 0.08) and expert heuristics such as water main age ([email protected] of 0.10) and history of past main breaks ([email protected] of 0.48). The model is currently deployed in the City of Syracuse. We are conducting a pilot by calculating the risk of failure for each city block over the period 2016-2018 using data up to the end of 2015 and, as of the end of 2017, there have been 42 breaks on our riskiest 52 mains. This has been a successful initiative for the city of Syracuse in improving its infrastructure and we believe this approach can be applied to other cities.
Avishek Kumar, Syed Ali Asad Rizvi, Benjamin Brooks, Ali Vanderveld, Kevin H. Wilson, Chad Kenney, Sam Edelstein, Adria Finch, Andrew Maxwell, Joe Zuckerbraun, Rayid Ghani
KDD5
2016 Back to the basics: Bayesian extensions of IRT outperform neural networks for proficiency estimation
Kevin H. Wilson, Yan Karklin, Bojian Han, Chaitanya Ekanadham
EDM1
2007 Correlations of Partial Words
Francine Blanchet-Sadri, Joshua D. Gafni, Kevin H. Wilson
STACS3