Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Richard Jeffers

dblp:62/4754 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Embedded and real-time systems · 62% Distributed systems · 38%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Transaction processing and concurrency control · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time databases
0.021995
Ordered Shared Locks for Real-Time Databases · VLDB J. 1995
Using Delayed Commitment in Locking Protocols for Real-Time Databases · SIGMOD Conference 1992
Transaction processing and concurrency control › concurrency control
locking protocols
0.021992
Using Delayed Commitment in Locking Protocols for Real-Time Databases · SIGMOD Conference 1992
An Approach to Eliminate Transaction Blocking in Locking Protocols · PODS 1992
Distributed systems
concurrency control
0.011995
Ordered Shared Locks for Real-Time Databases · VLDB J. 1995
Transaction processing and concurrency control › concurrency control
locking
0.011995
Ordered Shared Locks for Real-Time Databases · VLDB J. 1995
Transaction processing and concurrency control › concurrency control › locking protocols
two-phase locking
0.011992
Using Delayed Commitment in Locking Protocols for Real-Time Databases · SIGMOD Conference 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ordered sharing · 0.0delayed commitment · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Ordered Shared Locks for Real-Time Databases
Divyakant Agrawal, Amr El Abbadi, Richard Jeffers, Lijing Lin
VLDB J.3
1992 An Approach to Eliminate Transaction Blocking in Locking Protocols
abstract
The 'Half-
Divyakant Agrawal, Amr El Abbadi, Richard Jeffers
PODS3
1992 Using Delayed Commitment in Locking Protocols for Real-Time Databases
abstract
In this paper, we propose locking protocols that are useful for real-time databases. Our approach is motivated from two main observations. First, locking protocols are widely accepted and used in most database systems. Second, in real-time databases it has been shown that the blocking behavior of transactions in locking protocols results in performance degradation. We use a new relationship between locks called ordered sharing to eliminate blocking that arises in the traditional locking protocols. Ordered sharing eliminates blocking of read and write operations but may result in delayed commitment. Since in real-time databases, timeliness and not response time is the crucial factor, or protocols exploit this delay to allow transactions to execute within the slacks of delayed transactions. We compare the performance of the proposed protocols with the two phase locking protocol for real-time databases. Our experiments indicate that the propose protocols significantly reduce the percentage of missed deadlines in the system for a variety of workloads.
Divyakant Agrawal, Amr El Abbadi, Richard Jeffers
SIGMOD Conference3