Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maryam Fazel-Zarandi
dblp:62/5920
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Language models and text generation · 55% Speech recognition and synthesis · 24% Reinforcement learning · 10% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Explore Theory of Mind: program-guided adversarial data generation for theory of mind reasoning · ICLR 2025 ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoning · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction following |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | AdvancedIF: Rubric-Based Benchmarking and Reinforcement Learning for Advancing LLM Instruction Following · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | AdvancedIF: Rubric-Based Benchmarking and Reinforcement Learning for Advancing LLM Instruction Following · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Self-Consistency Preference Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
self-alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Self-Consistency Preference Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
self-consistency |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Self-Consistency Preference Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
theory of mind |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Explore Theory of Mind: program-guided adversarial data generation for theory of mind reasoning · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › automatic speech recognition
multilingual speech recognition |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Scaling Speech Technology to 1, 000+ Languages · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speech synthesis
multilingual speech synthesis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Scaling Speech Technology to 1, 000+ Languages · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speech representation learning
self-supervised speech representation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Scaling Speech Technology to 1, 000+ Languages · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
reasoning evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoning · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speech analysis
language identification |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Scaling Speech Technology to 1, 000+ Languages · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.0self-consistency · 0.9reward modeling · 0.9preference optimization · 0.9domain-specific language · 0.9a* search · 0.9wav2vec 2.0 · 0.8self-supervised learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | AdvancedIF: Rubric-Based Benchmarking and Reinforcement Learning for Advancing LLM Instruction FollowingabstractYun He, Wenzhe Li, Hejia Zhang, Songlin Li, Karishma Mandyam, Sopan Khosla, Yuanhao Xiong, Nanshu Wang, Xiaoliang Peng, Beibin Li, Shengjie Bi, Shishir G Patil, Qi Qi, Shengyu Feng, Julian Katz-Samuels, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Sujan Kumar Gonugondla, Hunter Lang, Yue Yu, Yundi Qian, Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, Licheng Yu, Amine Benhalloum, Hany Hassan Awadalla, Manaal Faruqui. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Karishma Mandyam, Sopan Khosla, Yuanhao Xiong, Nanshu Wang, Xiaoliang Peng, Beibin Li, Shengjie Bi, Shishir G. Patil, Shengyu Feng, Julian Katz-Samuels, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Sujan K. Gonugondla, Hunter Lang, Yue Yu 0009, Yundi Qian, Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, Licheng Yu, Amine Benhalloum, Hany Hassan, Manaal Faruqui |
ACL (1) | 21 |
| 2025 | Explore Theory of Mind: program-guided adversarial data generation for theory of mind reasoningabstractDo large language models (LLMs) have theory of mind? A plethora of papers and benchmarks have been introduced to evaluate if current models have been able to develop this key ability of social intelligence. However, all rely on limited datasets with simple patterns that can potentially lead to problematic blind spots in evaluation and an overestimation of model capabilities. We introduce ExploreToM, the first framework to allow large-scale generation of diverse and challenging theory of mind data for robust training and evaluation. Our approach leverages an A* search over a custom domain-specific language to produce complex story structures and novel, diverse, yet plausible scenarios to stress test the limits of LLMs. Our evaluation reveals that state-of-the-art LLMs, such as Llama-3.1-70B and GPT-4o, show accuracies as low as 0% and 9% on ExploreToM-generated data, highlighting the need for more robust theory of mind evaluation. As our generations are a conceptual superset of prior work, fine-tuning on our data yields a 27-point accuracy improvement on the classic ToMi benchmark (Le et al., 2019). ExploreToM also enables uncovering underlying skills and factors missing for models to show theory of mind, such as unreliable state tracking or data imbalances, which may contribute to models' poor performance on benchmarks. Melanie Sclar, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, Yulia Tsvetkov, Yonatan Bisk, Yejin Choi 0001, Asli Celikyilmaz |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2025 | Self-Consistency Preference OptimizationabstractSelf-alignment, whereby models learn to improve themselves without human annotation, is a rapidly growing research area. However, existing techniques often fail to improve complex reasoning tasks due to the difficulty of assigning correct rewards. An orthogonal approach that is known to improve correctness is self-consistency, a method applied at inference time based on multiple sampling in order to find the most consistent answer. In this work, we extend the self-consistency concept to help train models. We thus introduce self-consistency preference optimization (ScPO), which iteratively trains consistent answers to be preferred over inconsistent ones on unsupervised new problems. We show ScPO leads to large improvements over conventional reward model training on reasoning tasks such as GSM8K and MATH, closing the gap with supervised training with gold answers or preferences, and that combining ScPO with standard supervised learning improves results even further. On ZebraLogic, ScPO finetunes Llama-3 8B to be superior to Llama-3 70B, Gemma-2 27B, and Claude-3 Haiku. Archiki Prasad, Weizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Jing Xu 0014, Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, Mohit Bansal, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jason Weston, Jane Dwivedi-Yu |
ICML | 5 |
| 2024 | Scaling Speech Technology to 1, 000+ LanguagesabstractExpanding the language coverage of speech technology has the potential to improve access to information for many more people. However, current speech technology is restricted to about one hundred languages which is a small fraction of the over 7,000 languages spoken around the world. The Massively Multilingual Speech (MMS) project increases the number of supported languages by 10-40x, depending on the task while providing improved accuracy compared to prior work. The main ingredients are a new dataset based on readings of publicly available religious texts and effectively leveraging self-supervised learning. We built pre-trained wav2vec 2.0 models covering 1,406 languages, a single multilingual automatic speech recognition model for 1,107 languages, speech synthesis models for the same number of languages, as well as a language identification model for 4,017 languages. Experiments show that our multilingual speech recognition model more than halves the word error rate of Whisper on 54 languages of the FLEURS benchmark while being trained on a small fraction of the labeled data. Vineel Pratap, Andros Tjandra, Bowen Shi 0002, Paden Tomasello, Arun Babu, Sayani Kundu, Ali Elkahky, Zhaoheng Ni, Apoorv Vyas, Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, Alexei Baevski, Yossi Adi, Xiaohui Zhang 0007, Wei-Ning Hsu, Alexis Conneau, Michael Auli |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 10 |
| 2023 | Cocktail Hubert: Generalized Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Mixture and Single-Source SpeechabstractSelf-supervised learning leverages unlabeled data effectively, improving label efficiency and generalization to domains without labeled data. While recent work has studied generalization to more acoustic/linguistic domains, languages, and modalities, these investigations are limited to single-source speech with one primary speaker in the recording. This paper presents Cocktail HuBERT, a self-supervised learning framework that generalizes to mixture speech using a masked pseudo source separation objective. This objective encourages the model to identify the number of sources, separate and understand the context, and infer the content of masked regions represented as discovered units. Cocktail HuBERT outperforms state-of-the-art results with 69% lower WER on multi-speaker ASR, 31% lower DER on diarization, and is competitive on single-and multi-speaker tasks from SUPERB. Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, Wei-Ning Hsu |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 2023 | ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoning
Olga Golovneva, Moya Chen, Spencer Poff, Martin Corredor, Luke Zettlemoyer, Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, Asli Celikyilmaz |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2023 | Expresso: A Benchmark and Analysis of Discrete Expressive Speech ResynthesisabstractInternational audience Tu Anh Nguyen, Wei-Ning Hsu, Antony D'Avirro, Bowen Shi 0002, Itai Gat, Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, Tal Remez, Jade Copet, Gabriel Synnaeve, Michael Hassid, Felix Kreuk, Yossi Adi, Emmanuel Dupoux |
INTERSPEECH | 6 |
| 2013 | Identifying unreliable sources of skill and competency informationabstractOrganizations need to accurately understand the skills and competencies of their human resources in order to effectively respond to internal and external demands for expertise and make informed hiring decisions. In recent years, however, human resources have become highly mobile, making it more difficult for organizations to accurately learn their competencies. In such environment, organizations need to rely significantly on third parties to provide them with useful information about individuals. These sources and the information they provide, however, vary in degrees of trust and validity. In a previous paper, we developed an ontology for skills and competencies and modeled and analyzed the various sources of information used to derive the belief in an individual's level of competency. In this paper, we present an approach based on social network analysis for identifying unreliable sources of competency information. We explore the conditions under which evaluations given by an individual or a group about another can be trusted. We evaluate this approach using recommendation data gathered by crawling user profiles in LinkedIn. Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, Mark S. Fox |
ASONAM | 1 |
| 2012 | An Ontology for Skill and Competency ManagementabstractTo stay competitive within the market, organizations need to understand the skills and competencies of their human resources in order to best utilize them. This paper focuses on the problem of modeling human resources in a dynamic environment, and presents a formal ontology for representing, inferring, and validating skills and competencies over time. Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, Mark S. Fox |
FOIS | 1 |
| 2010 | Reasoning about Skills and Competencies
Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, Mark S. Fox |
PRO-VE | 1 |