Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eric H. Huang
dblp:63/10489
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 56% Information extraction and text analysis · 41% Learning paradigms · 4% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Improving Word Representations via Global Context and Multiple Word Prototypes · ACL (1) 2012 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
word representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Improving Word Representations via Global Context and Multiple Word Prototypes · ACL (1) 2012 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text similarity
paraphrase identification |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Dynamic Pooling and Unfolding Recursive Autoencoders for Paraphrase Detection · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › text embedding
phrase embedding |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Dynamic Pooling and Unfolding Recursive Autoencoders for Paraphrase Detection · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › hierarchical representation
recursive autoencoder |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Dynamic Pooling and Unfolding Recursive Autoencoders for Paraphrase Detection · NIPS 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text similarity › semantic similarity
sentence similarity |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Dynamic Pooling and Unfolding Recursive Autoencoders for Paraphrase Detection · NIPS 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Semi-Supervised Recursive Autoencoders for Predicting Sentiment Distributions · EMNLP 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word sense disambiguation |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Improving Word Representations via Global Context and Multiple Word Prototypes · ACL (1) 2012 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Semi-Supervised Recursive Autoencoders for Predicting Sentiment Distributions · EMNLP 2011 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
unsupervised representation learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Dynamic Pooling and Unfolding Recursive Autoencoders for Paraphrase Detection · NIPS 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
recursive autoencoder · 0.2multiple word prototypes · 0.1global context · 0.1dynamic pooling · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Improving Word Representations via Global Context and Multiple Word Prototypes
Eric H. Huang, Richard Socher, Christopher D. Manning, Andrew Y. Ng |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2011 | Semi-Supervised Recursive Autoencoders for Predicting Sentiment Distributions
Richard Socher, Jeffrey Pennington, Eric H. Huang, Andrew Y. Ng, Christopher D. Manning |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2011 | Dynamic Pooling and Unfolding Recursive Autoencoders for Paraphrase DetectionabstractParaphrase detection is the task of examining two sentences and determining whether they have the same meaning. In order to obtain high accuracy on this task, thorough syntactic and semantic analysis of the two statements is needed. We introduce a method for paraphrase detection based on recursive autoencoders (RAE). Our unsupervised RAEs are based on a novel unfolding objective and learn feature vectors for phrases in syntactic trees. These features are used to measure the word- and phrase-wise similarity between two sentences. Since sentences may be of arbitrary length, the resulting matrix of similarity measures is of variable size. We introduce a novel dynamic pooling layer which computes a fixed-sized representation from the variable-sized matrices. The pooled representation is then used as input to a classifier. Our method outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches on the challenging MSRP paraphrase corpus. Richard Socher, Eric H. Huang, Jeffrey Pennington, Andrew Y. Ng, Christopher D. Manning |
NIPS | 2 |