Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jonas Zaddach

dblp:63/11497 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Systems and software security · 56% Cyber-physical and IoT security · 44%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security › firmware security
embedded firmware security
0.212014
A Large-Scale Analysis of the Security of Embedded Firmwares · USENIX Security Symposium 2014
Cyber-physical and IoT security
embedded system security
0.212014
AVATAR: A Framework to Support Dynamic Security Analysis of Embedded Systems' Firmwares · NDSS 2014
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery
0.112014
A Large-Scale Analysis of the Security of Embedded Firmwares · USENIX Security Symposium 2014
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical system platforms
0.112014
AVATAR: A Framework to Support Dynamic Security Analysis of Embedded Systems' Firmwares · NDSS 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dynamic analysis · 0.4static analysis · 0.2large-scale measurement · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 PIE: Parser Identification in Embedded Systems
abstract
Embedded systems are responsible for the security and safety of modern societies, controlling the correct operation of cars and airplanes, satellites and medical equipment, military units and all critical infrastructures. Being integrated in large and complex environments, embedded systems need to support several communication protocols to interact with other devices or with their users. Interestingly, embedded software often implements protocols that deviate from their original specifications. Some are extended with additional features, while others are completely undocumented. Furthermore, embedded parsers often consist of complex C code which is optimized to improve performance and reduce size. However, this code is rarely designed with security in mind, and often lacks proper input validation, making those devices vulnerable to memory corruption attacks. Furthermore, most embedded designs are closed source and third party security evaluations are only possible by looking at the binary firmware.
Lucian Cojocar, Jonas Zaddach, Roel Verdult, Herbert Bos, Aurélien Francillon, Davide Balzarotti
ACSAC2
2014 AVATAR: A Framework to Support Dynamic Security Analysis of Embedded Systems' Firmwares
Jonas Zaddach, Luca Bruno, Aurélien Francillon, Davide Balzarotti
NDSS1
2014 A Large-Scale Analysis of the Security of Embedded Firmwares
Andrei Costin, Jonas Zaddach, Aurélien Francillon, Davide Balzarotti
USENIX Security Symposium2
2013 Implementation and implications of a stealth hard-drive backdoor
abstract
Modern workstations and servers implicitly trust hard disks to act as well-behaved block devices. This paper analyzes the catastrophic loss of security that occurs when hard disks are not trustworthy. First, we show that it is possible to compromise the firmware of a commercial off-the-shelf hard drive, by resorting only to public information and reverse engineering. Using such a compromised firmware, we present a stealth rootkit that replaces arbitrary blocks from the disk while they are written, providing a data replacement back-door. The measured performance overhead of the compromised disk drive is less than 1% compared with a normal, non-malicious disk drive. We then demonstrate that a remote attacker can even establish a communication channel with a compromised disk to infiltrate commands and to ex-filtrate data. In our example, this channel is established over the Internet to an unmodified web server that relies on the compromised drive for its storage, passing through the original webserver, database server, database storage engine, filesystem driver, and block device driver. Additional experiments, performed in an emulated disk-drive environment, could automatically extract sensitive data such as /etc/shadow (or a secret key file) in less than a minute. This paper claims that the difficulty of implementing such an attack is not limited to the area of government cyber-warfare; rather, it is well within the reach of moderately funded criminals, botnet herders and academic researchers.
Jonas Zaddach, Anil Kurmus, Davide Balzarotti, Erik-Oliver Blass, Aurélien Francillon, Travis Goodspeed, Moitrayee Gupta, Ioannis Koltsidas
ACSAC1