Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Manfred Pinkal

dblp:63/2723 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
36ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 35 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3Security and privacy · 1Theory of computation · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
12 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 41% Video understanding and tracking · 26% Vision and language · 21%
Network and information security
1 paper
Hardware security and side channels · 67% Privacy and data protection · 33%

Topics — the 22 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
activity recognition
0.432016
Recognizing Fine-Grained and Composite Activities Using Hand-Centric Features and Script Data · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2016
Script Data for Attribute-Based Recognition of Composite Activities · ECCV (1) 2012
Translating Video Content to Natural Language Descriptions · ICCV 2013
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › activity recognition
complex activity recognition
0.422016
Recognizing Fine-Grained and Composite Activities Using Hand-Centric Features and Script Data · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2016
Script Data for Attribute-Based Recognition of Composite Activities · ECCV (1) 2012
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual grounding
visual semantic role labeling
0.312018
Grounding Semantic Roles in Images · EMNLP 2018
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis
situation entity type classification
0.212016
Situation entity types: automatic classification of clause-level aspect · ACL (1) 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics › verb semantics
aspectual classification
0.212015
Automatic recognition of habituals: a three-way classification of clausal aspect · EMNLP 2015
Computer vision › Vision and language
video captioning
0.212013
Translating Video Content to Natural Language Descriptions · ICCV 2013
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language generation
vision-to-language translation
0.212013
Translating Video Content to Natural Language Descriptions · ICCV 2013
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
script knowledge
0.222012
Learning Script Knowledge with Web Experiments · ACL 2010
Script Data for Attribute-Based Recognition of Composite Activities · ECCV (1) 2012
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › entity linking
entity disambiguation
0.112011
Robust Disambiguation of Named Entities in Text · EMNLP 2011
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition
0.112011
Robust Disambiguation of Named Entities in Text · EMNLP 2011
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
distributional semantics
0.112010
Contextualizing Semantic Representations Using Syntactically Enriched Vector Models · ACL 2010
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
semantic representation
0.112010
Contextualizing Semantic Representations Using Syntactically Enriched Vector Models · ACL 2010
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
web-based knowledge acquisition
0.112010
Learning Script Knowledge with Web Experiments · ACL 2010
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack › acoustic side channel
acoustic side-channel attack
0.112010
Acoustic Side-Channel Attacks on Printers · USENIX Security Symposium 2010
Privacy and data protection
information leakage
0.112010
Acoustic Side-Channel Attacks on Printers · USENIX Security Symposium 2010
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel attack
0.112010
Acoustic Side-Channel Attacks on Printers · USENIX Security Symposium 2010
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › data annotation
semantic annotation
0.012003
Towards a Resource for Lexical Semantics: A Large German Corpus with Extensive Semantic Annotation · ACL 2003
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
lexical semantics
0.012000
Feature Logic for Dotted Types: A Formalism for Complex Word Meanings · ACL 2000
Logic in computer science › philosophical logic › non-classical logic
feature logic
0.012000
Feature Logic for Dotted Types: A Formalism for Complex Word Meanings · ACL 2000
Logic in computer science
semantics
0.011997
A Uniform Approach to Underspecification and Parallelism · ACL 1997
Logic in computer science › semantics
underspecified semantics
0.011997
A Uniform Approach to Underspecification and Parallelism · ACL 1997
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
frame semantics
0.012003
Towards a Resource for Lexical Semantics: A Large German Corpus with Extensive Semantic Annotation · ACL 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

frame semantics · 0.3distant supervision from captions · 0.3sequence labeling · 0.2script data · 0.2hand-centric features · 0.2brown clusters · 0.2statistical machine translation · 0.2conditional random field · 0.2web experiments · 0.1crowdsourcing · 0.1context unification · 0.0constraint language · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Grounding Semantic Roles in Images
abstract
We address the task of visual semantic role labeling (vSRL), the identification of the participants of a situation or event in a visual scene, and their labeling with their semantic relations to the event or situation.We render candidate participants as image regions of objects, and train a model which learns to ground roles in the regions which depict the corresponding participant.Experimental results demonstrate that we can train a vSRL model without reliance on prohibitive image-based role annotations, by utilizing noisy data which we extract automatically from image captions using a linguistic SRL system.Furthermore, our model induces frame-semantic visual representations, and their comparison to previous work on supervised visual verb sense disambiguation yields overall better results.
Carina Silberer, Manfred Pinkal
EMNLP2
2018 MCScript: A Novel Dataset for Assessing Machine Comprehension Using Script Knowledge
Simon Ostermann 0002, Ashutosh Modi, Michael Roth 0001, Stefan Thater, Manfred Pinkal
LREC5
2018 Mapping Texts to Scripts: An Entailment Study
Simon Ostermann 0002, Hannah Seitz, Stefan Thater, Manfred Pinkal
LREC4
2018 Multi-layer Annotation of the Rigveda
Oliver Hellwig, Heinrich Hettrich, Ashutosh Modi, Manfred Pinkal
LREC4
2018 Semi-Supervised Clustering for Short Answer Scoring
Andrea Horbach, Manfred Pinkal
LREC2
2017 Modelling Semantic Expectation: Using Script Knowledge for Referent Prediction
abstract
Recent research in psycholinguistics has provided increasing evidence that humans predict upcoming content. Prediction also affects perception and might be a key to robustness in human language processing. In this paper, we investigate the factors that affect human prediction by building a computational model that can predict upcoming discourse referents based on linguistic knowledge alone vs. linguistic knowledge jointly with common-sense knowledge in the form of scripts. We find that script knowledge significantly improves model estimates of human predictions. In a second study, we test the highly controversial hypothesis that predictability influences referring expression type but do not find evidence for such an effect.
Ashutosh Modi, Ivan Titov 0001, Vera Demberg, Asad B. Sayeed, Manfred Pinkal
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics5
2016 Situation entity types: automatic classification of clause-level aspect
abstract
This paper describes the first robust approach to automatically labeling clauses with their situation entity type (Smith, 2003), capturing aspectual phenomena at the clause level which are relevant for interpreting both semantics at the clause level and discourse structure.Previous work on this task used a small data set from a limited domain, and relied mainly on words as features, an approach which is impractical in larger settings.We provide a new corpus of texts from 13 genres (40,000 clauses) annotated with situation entity types.We show that our sequence labeling approach using distributional information in the form of Brown clusters, as well as syntactic-semantic features targeted to the task, is robust across genres, reaching accuracies of up to 76%.
Annemarie Friedrich, Alexis Palmer, Manfred Pinkal
ACL (1)3
2016 A Corpus of Literal and Idiomatic Uses of German Infinitive-Verb Compounds
Andrea Horbach, Andrea Hensler, Sabine Krome, Jakob Prange, Werner Scholze-Stubenrecht, Diana Steffen, Stefan Thater, Christian Wellner, Manfred Pinkal
LREC9
2016 InScript: Narrative texts annotated with script information
Ashutosh Modi, Tatiana Anikina, Simon Ostermann 0002, Manfred Pinkal
LREC4
2016 A Crowdsourced Database of Event Sequence Descriptions for the Acquisition of High-quality Script Knowledge
Lilian Wanzare, Alessandra Zarcone, Stefan Thater, Manfred Pinkal
LREC4
2016 Recognizing Fine-Grained and Composite Activities Using Hand-Centric Features and Script Data
Marcus Rohrbach, Anna Rohrbach, Michaela Regneri, Sikandar Amin, Mykhaylo Andriluka, Manfred Pinkal, Bernt Schiele
Int. J. Comput. Vis.6
2015 Discourse-sensitive Automatic Identification of Generic Expressions
abstract
Annemarie Friedrich, Manfred Pinkal. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2015.
Annemarie Friedrich, Manfred Pinkal
ACL (1)2
2015 Automatic recognition of habituals: a three-way classification of clausal aspect
abstract
This paper provides the first fully automatic approach for classifying clauses with respect to their aspectual properties as habitual, episodic or static.We bring together two strands of previous work, which address only the related tasks of the episodic-habitual and stative-dynamic distinctions, respectively.Our method combines different sources of information found to be useful for these tasks.We are the first to exhaustively classify all clauses of a text, achieving up to 80% accuracy (baseline 58%) for the three-way classification task, and up to 85% accuracy for related subtasks (baselines 50% and 60%), outperforming previous work.In addition, we provide a new large corpus of Wikipedia texts labeled according to our linguistically motivated guidelines.
Annemarie Friedrich, Manfred Pinkal
EMNLP2
2014 A Hierarchical Bayesian Model for Unsupervised Induction of Script Knowledge
abstract
Scripts representing common sense knowledge about stereotyped sequences of events have been shown to be a valuable resource for NLP applications.We present a hierarchical Bayesian model for unsupervised learning of script knowledge from crowdsourced descriptions of human activities.Events and constraints on event ordering are induced jointly in one unified framework.We use a statistical model over permutations which captures event ordering constraints in a more flexible way than previous approaches.In order to alleviate the sparsity problem caused by using relatively small datasets, we incorporate in our hierarchical model an informed prior on word distributions.The resulting model substantially outperforms a state-of-the-art method on the event ordering task.
Lea Frermann, Ivan Titov 0001, Manfred Pinkal
EACL3
2014 Aligning Predicate-Argument Structures for Paraphrase Fragment Extraction
Michaela Regneri, Rui Wang 0005, Manfred Pinkal
LREC3
2013 Translating Video Content to Natural Language Descriptions
abstract
Humans use rich natural language to describe and communicate visual perceptions. In order to provide natural language descriptions for visual content, this paper combines two important ingredients. First, we generate a rich semantic representation of the visual content including e.g. object and activity labels. To predict the semantic representation we learn a CRF to model the relationships between different components of the visual input. And second, we propose to formulate the generation of natural language as a machine translation problem using the semantic representation as source language and the generated sentences as target language. For this we exploit the power of a parallel corpus of videos and textual descriptions and adapt statistical machine translation to translate between our two languages. We evaluate our video descriptions on the TACoS dataset, which contains video snippets aligned with sentence descriptions. Using automatic evaluation and human judgments we show significant improvements over several baseline approaches, motivated by prior work. Our translation approach also shows improvements over related work on an image description task.
Marcus Rohrbach, Ivan Titov 0001, Stefan Thater, Manfred Pinkal, Bernt Schiele
ICCV5
2013 Grounding Action Descriptions in Videos
abstract
Recent work has shown that the integration of visual information into text-based models can substantially improve model predictions, but so far only visual information extracted from static images has been used. In this paper, we consider the problem of grounding sentences describing actions in visual information extracted from videos. We present a general purpose corpus that aligns high quality videos with multiple natural language descriptions of the actions portrayed in the videos, together with an annotation of how similar the action descriptions are to each other. Experimental results demonstrate that a text-based model of similarity between actions improves substantially when combined with visual information from videos depicting the described actions.
Michaela Regneri, Marcus Rohrbach, Dominikus Wetzel, Stefan Thater, Bernt Schiele, Manfred Pinkal
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics6
2012 Script Data for Attribute-Based Recognition of Composite Activities
Marcus Rohrbach, Michaela Regneri, Mykhaylo Andriluka, Sikandar Amin, Manfred Pinkal, Bernt Schiele
ECCV (1)5
2011 Robust Disambiguation of Named Entities in Text
Johannes Hoffart, Mohamed Amir Yosef, Ilaria Bordino, Hagen Fürstenau, Manfred Pinkal, Marc Spaniol, Bilyana Taneva, Stefan Thater, Gerhard Weikum
EMNLP5
2011 Word Meaning in Context: A Simple and Effective Vector Model
Stefan Thater, Hagen Fürstenau, Manfred Pinkal
IJCNLP3
2010 Learning Script Knowledge with Web Experiments
Michaela Regneri, Alexander Koller, Manfred Pinkal
ACL3
2010 Contextualizing Semantic Representations Using Syntactically Enriched Vector Models
Stefan Thater, Hagen Fürstenau, Manfred Pinkal
ACL3
2010 Generating FrameNets of Various Granularities: The FrameNet Transformer
Josef Ruppenhofer, Jonas Sunde, Manfred Pinkal
LREC3
2010 Acoustic Side-Channel Attacks on Printers
Michael Backes 0001, Markus Dürmuth, Sebastian Gerling, Manfred Pinkal, Caroline Sporleder
USENIX Security Symposium4
2009 Assessing the impact of frame semantics on textual entailment
abstract
Abstract In this article, we underpin the intuition that frame semantic information is a useful resource for modelling textual entailment. To this end, we provide a manual frame semantic annotation for the test set used in the second recognizing textual entailment (RTE) challenge – the FrameNet-annotated textual entailment (FATE) corpus – and discuss experiments we conducted on this basis. In particular, our experiments show that the frame semantic lexicon provided by the Berkeley FrameNet project provides surprisingly good coverage for the task at hand. We identify issues of automatic semantic analysis components, as well as insufficient modelling of the information provided by frame semantic analysis as reasons for ambivalent results of current systems based on frame semantics.
Aljoscha Burchardt, Marco Pennacchiotti, Stefan Thater, Manfred Pinkal
Nat. Lang. Eng.4
2008 CLIoS: Cross-lingual Induction of Speech Recognition Grammars
Nadine Perera, Michael Pitz, Manfred Pinkal
LREC3
2006 Natural and Intuitive Multimodal Dialogue for In-Car Applications: The SAMMIE System
Tilman Becker, Nate Blaylock, Ciprian Gerstenberger, Ivana Kruijff-Korbayová, Andreas Korthauer, Manfred Pinkal, Michael Pitz, Peter Poller, Jan Schehl
ECAI6
2005 Computational Linguistic Support for Legal Ontology Construction
abstract
The potential of knowledge-based technological support for work in the legal domain has become widely recognized in recent time. This paper argues for an approach that is meant to complement existing work on top-level, statute-based ontologies for the law by extracting conceptual knowledge from verdict texts. Starting from a corpus-based survey on the definition and modification of concepts in German court verdicts we are currently working out a detailed description of the linguistic structures and semantic mechanisms involved. Based on this we want to develop tools that automatically recognize and process portions of verdicts that contain definitions. The resulting system will support the corpus-based extension of (hand-made) top-level legal ontologies and the update of legal terminological knowledge bases with regard to new jurisdiction. The research described in the paper is conducted at the Saarbrücken computational linguistics (CL) group within the project CORTE (computational linguistic methods for legal terminology).
Stephan Walter, Manfred Pinkal
ICAIL2
2003 Towards a Resource for Lexical Semantics: A Large German Corpus with Extensive Semantic Annotation
abstract
We describe the ongoing construction of a large, semantically annotated corpus resource as reliable basis for the large-scale acquisition of word-semantic information, e.g. the construction of domain-independent lexica. The backbone of the annotation are semantic roles in the frame semantics paradigm. We report experiences and evaluate the annotated data from the first project stage. On this basis, we discuss the problems of vagueness and ambiguity in semantic annotation.
Katrin Erk, Andrea Kowalski, Sebastian Padó, Manfred Pinkal
ACL4
2000 Feature Logic for Dotted Types: A Formalism for Complex Word Meanings
abstract
In this paper we revisit Pustejovsky's proposal to treat ontologically complex word meaning by so-called dotted pairs. We use a higher-order feature logic based on Ohori's record λ-calculus to model the semantics of words like book and library, in particular their behavior in the context of quantification and cardinality statements.
Manfred Pinkal, Michael Kohlhase
ACL1
1997 A Uniform Approach to Underspecification and Parallelism
abstract
We propose a unified framework in which to treat semantic underspecification and parallelism phenomena in discourse. The framework employs a constraint language that can express equality and subtree relations between finite trees. In addition, our constraint language can express the equality up-to relation over trees which captures parallelism between them. The constraints are solved by context unification. We demonstrate the use of our framework at the examples of quantifier scope, ellipsis, and their interaction.
Joachim Niehren, Manfred Pinkal, Peter Ruhrberg
ACL2
1997 On Equality Up-to Constraints over Finite Trees, Context Unification, and One-Step Rewriting
Joachim Niehren, Manfred Pinkal, Peter Ruhrberg
CADE2
1996 Compositional Semantics in Verbmobil
Johan Bos, Björn Gambäck, Christian Lieske, Yoshiki Mori, Manfred Pinkal, Karsten L. Worm
COLING5
1996 An Education and Research Tool for Computational Semantics
Karsten Konrad, Holger Maier, David Milward, Manfred Pinkal
COLING4
1991 On The Syntactic-Semantic Analysis Of Bound Anaphora
Manfred Pinkal
EACL1
1986 Definite Noun Phrases and the Semantics of Discourse
Manfred Pinkal
COLING1