VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fan Zhou 0003
dblp:63/3122-3
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2874-2148ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 28% Reinforcement learning · 25% Trustworthy machine learning · 24% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Medical and health informatics · 69% Smart cities and intelligent transportation · 31% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
distributional reinforcement learning |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Adversarial Learning of Distributional Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2023 Multi-Objective Distributional Reinforcement Learning for Large-Scale Order Dispatching · ICDM 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Enhancing Prediction Performance through Influence Measure · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › Data-centric AI
data influence |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Enhancing Prediction Performance through Influence Measure · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data selection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Enhancing Prediction Performance through Influence Measure · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data curation
training data optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Enhancing Prediction Performance through Influence Measure · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adversarial Learning of Distributional Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
experimental design |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Optimal Treatment Allocation for Efficient Policy Evaluation in Sequential Decision Making · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Optimal Treatment Allocation for Efficient Policy Evaluation in Sequential Decision Making · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adversarial Learning of Distributional Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
treatment effect estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Optimal Treatment Allocation for Efficient Policy Evaluation in Sequential Decision Making · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-objective reinforcement learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-Objective Distributional Reinforcement Learning for Large-Scale Order Dispatching · ICDM 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
order dispatching |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-Objective Distributional Reinforcement Learning for Large-Scale Order Dispatching · ICDM 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Learning with Non-ignorable Non-response · NeurIPS 2019 |
Medical and health informatics › oncology
cancer diagnosis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A benchmark for comparing precision medicine methods in thyroid cancer diagnosis using tissue microarrays · Bioinform. 2018 |
Medical and health informatics
clinical informatics |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A benchmark for comparing precision medicine methods in thyroid cancer diagnosis using tissue microarrays · Bioinform. 2018 |
Smart cities and intelligent transportation
ride-hailing |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-Objective Distributional Reinforcement Learning for Large-Scale Order Dispatching · ICDM 2021 |
Smart cities and intelligent transportation › mobility-on-demand
supply-demand matching |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-Objective Distributional Reinforcement Learning for Large-Scale Order Dispatching · ICDM 2021 |
Data integration and cleaning
missing data |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Learning with Non-ignorable Non-response · NeurIPS 2019 |
Image and video processing
biomedical image analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | A benchmark for comparing precision medicine methods in thyroid cancer diagnosis using tissue microarrays · Bioinform. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semi-markov decision process · 1.0inverse reinforcement learning · 1.0implicit quantile network · 1.0deep q-network · 1.0influence functions · 0.9inverse weighting estimation · 0.8variance minimization · 0.7tissue microarray analysis · 0.7markov decision process · 0.7information geometry · 0.7benchmarking · 0.7a/b testing · 0.7sampling imputation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Enhancing Prediction Performance through Influence MeasureabstractIn the field of machine learning, the pursuit of accurate models is ongoing. A key aspect of improving prediction performance lies in identifying which data points in the training set should be excluded and which high-quality, potentially unlabeled data points outside the training set should be incorporated to improve the model's performance on unseen data. To accomplish this, an effective metric is needed to evaluate the contribution of each data point toward enhancing overall model performance.
This paper proposes the use of an influence measure as a metric to assess the impact of training data on test set performance. Additionally, we introduce a data selection method to optimize the training set as well as a dynamic active learning algorithm driven by the influence measure. The effectiveness of these methods is demonstrated through extensive simulations and real-world datasets. Shuguang Yu, Hongtu Zhu, Fan Zhou 0003 |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2023 | Adversarial Learning of Distributional Reinforcement LearningabstractReinforcement learning (RL) has made significant advancements in artificial intelligence. However, its real-world applications are limited due to differences between simulated environments and the actual world. Consequently, it is crucial to systematically analyze how each component of the RL system can affect the final model performance. In this study, we propose an adversarial learning framework for distributional reinforcement learning, which adopts the concept of influence measure from the statistics community. This framework enables us to detect performance loss caused by either the internal policy structure or the external state observation. The proposed influence measure is based on information geometry and has desirable properties of invariance. We demonstrate that the influence measure is useful for three diagnostic tasks: identifying fragile states in trajectories, determining the instability of the policy architecture, and pinpointing anomalously sensitive policy parameters. Hongtu Zhu, Fan Zhou 0003 |
ICML | 4 |
| 2023 | Optimal Treatment Allocation for Efficient Policy Evaluation in Sequential Decision MakingabstractA/B testing is critical for modern technological companies to evaluate the effectiveness of newly developed products against standard baselines. This paper studies optimal designs that aim to maximize the amount of information obtained from online experiments to estimate treatment effects accurately. We propose three optimal allocation strategies in a dynamic setting where treatments are sequentially assigned over time. These strategies are designed to minimize the variance of the treatment effect estimator when data follow a non Markov decision process or a (time-varying) Markov decision process. We further develop estimation procedures based on existing off-policy evaluation (OPE) methods and conduct extensive experiments in various environments to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methodologies. In theory, we prove the optimality of the proposed treatment allocation design and establish upper bounds for the mean squared errors of the resulting treatment effect estimators. Chengchun Shi, Fan Zhou 0003, Hongtu Zhu |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2021 | Multi-Objective Distributional Reinforcement Learning for Large-Scale Order DispatchingabstractThe aim of this paper is to develop a multi-objective distributional reinforcement learning framework for improving order dispatching on large-scale ride-hailing platforms. Compared with traditional RL-based approaches that focus on drivers’ income, the proposed framework also accounts for the spatiotemporal difference between the supply and demand networks. Specifically, we model the dispatching problem as a two-objective Semi-Markov Decision Process (SMDP) and estimate the relative importance of the two objectives under some unknown existing policy via Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL). Then, we combine Implicit Quantile Networks (IQN) with the traditional Deep Q-Networks (DQN) to jointly learn the two return distributions and adjusting their weights to refine the old policy through on-line planning and achieve a higher supply-demand coherence of the platform. We conduct large-scale dispatching experiments to demonstrate the remarkable improvement of proposed approach on the platform’s efficiency. Fan Zhou 0003, Chenfan Lu, Xiaocheng Tang, Fan Zhang 0098, Zhiwei (Tony) Qin, Jieping Ye, Hongtu Zhu |
ICDM | 1 |
| 2019 | Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Learning with Non-ignorable Non-responseabstractGraph-based semi-supervised learning is a very powerful tool in classification tasks, while in most existing literature the labelled nodes are assumed to be randomly sampled. When the labelling status depends on the unobserved node response, ignoring the missingness can lead to significant estimation bias and handicap the classifiers. This situation is called non-ignorable non-response. To solve the problem, we propose a Graph-based joint model with Non-ignorable Non-response (GNN), followed by a joint inverse weighting estimation procedure incorporated with sampling imputation approach. Our method is proved to outperform some state-of-art models in both regression and classification problems, by simulations and real analysis on the Cora dataset. Fan Zhou 0003, Tengfei Li 0001, Hongtu Zhu, Jieping Ye |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | A benchmark for comparing precision medicine methods in thyroid cancer diagnosis using tissue microarraysabstractMotivation: The aim of precision medicine is to harness new knowledge and technology to optimize the timing and targeting of interventions for maximal therapeutic benefit. This study explores the possibility of building AI models without precise pixel-level annotation in prediction of the tumor size, extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastasis, cancer stage and BRAF mutation in thyroid cancer diagnosis, providing the patients' background information, histopathological and immunohistochemical tissue images. Results: A novel framework for objective evaluation of automatic patient diagnosis algorithms has been established under the auspices of the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2017- A Grand Challenge for Tissue Microarray Analysis in Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis. Here, we present the datasets, methods and results of the challenge and lay down the principles for future uses of this benchmark. The main contributions of the challenge include the creation of the data repository of tissue microarrays; the creation of the clinical diagnosis classification data repository of thyroid cancer; and the definition of objective quantitative evaluation for comparison and ranking of the algorithms. With this benchmark, three automatic methods for predictions of the five clinical outcomes have been compared, and detailed quantitative evaluation results are presented in this paper. Based on the quantitative evaluation results, we believe automatic patient diagnosis is still a challenging and unsolved problem. Availability and implementation: The datasets and the evaluation software will be made available to the research community, further encouraging future developments in this field. (http://www-o.ntust.edu.tw/cvmi/ISBI2017/). Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Ching-Wei Wang, Yu-Ching Lee, Evelyne Calista, Fan Zhou 0003, Hongtu Zhu, Ryohei Suzuki, Daisuke Komura, Shumpei Ishikawa, Shih-Ping Cheng |
Bioinform. | 4 |