Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Larry M. Deschaine

dblp:63/3585 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-3993-8867ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › topic model
dynamic topic models
0.912025
Visualizing Temporal Topic Embeddings with a Compass · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025
Visualization and visual analytics
text visualization
0.912025
Visualizing Temporal Topic Embeddings with a Compass · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025
Visualization and visual analytics › text visualization
topic visualization
0.912025
Visualizing Temporal Topic Embeddings with a Compass · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

word2vec · 1.7compass-aligned embedding · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Visualizing Temporal Topic Embeddings with a Compass
abstract
Dynamic topic modeling is useful at discovering the development and change in latent topics over time. However, present methodology relies on algorithms that separate document and word representations. This prevents the creation of a meaningful embedding space where changes in word usage and documents can be directly analyzed in a temporal context. This paper proposes an expansion of the compass-aligned temporal Word2Vec methodology into dynamic topic modeling. Such a method allows for the direct comparison of word and document embeddings across time in dynamic topics. This enables the creation of visualizations that incorporate temporal word embeddings within the context of documents into topic visualizations. In experiments against the current state-of-the-art, our proposed method demonstrates overall competitive performance in topic relevancy and diversity across temporal datasets of varying size. Simultaneously, it provides insightful visualizations focused on temporal word embeddings while maintaining the insights provided by global topic evolution, advancing our understanding of how topics evolve over time.
Daniel Palamarchuk, Lemara Williams, Brian Mayer, Thomas Danielson, Rebecca Faust, Larry M. Deschaine, Chris North 0001
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.6
2007 Discrimination of munitions and explosives of concern at F.E. warren afb using linear genetic programming
abstract
Removing underground, unexploded bombs, mortars, cannon-shells and other ordnance ("MEC" or "UXO") from former military ranges is difficult and expensive. The principal difficulty is discriminating intact, underground ordnance from other metallic items such as fragments of exploded ordnance ("Clutter"), magnetic rocks, and "historic" items such as horseshoes, barbed-wire, and refrigerators. This study represents the first, large-scale, blind-test of MEC discrimination technology on production-grade, survey-mode data from the cleanup of a real impact site. The results reported here significantly advance the state-of-the-art in MEC discrimination over alternative forward-modeling/inversion approaches to performing MEC discrimination. We combined Linear Genetic Programming (LGP) and statistical analysis to process data from the cleanup of 600 acres of the F.E.Warren Air Force Base. That data contained almost 30,000 targets of interest identified by geophysicists, including three-hundred thirty-two 75mm projectiles (75mm) and 37mm projectiles (37mm). A little under one-third of the groundtruth was held back by the customer for blind-testing. Our task was to discriminate intact 37mm's and 75mm's from the clutter by ordering the targets from most-likely to be MEC to least-likely to be MEC in what is referred to as a "prioritized dig-list". We identified all 75mm's by 28.2% of the way through our prioritized dig-list and all 37mm's by 64.2% of the way through the prioritized dig list. Thus, depending on ordnance type, we reduced the number of targets that had to be excavated (false alarms) to clear the entire site by between 35% and 72%.
Frank D. Francone, Larry M. Deschaine, Jeffrey J. Warren
GECCO2
2004 Extending the boundaries of design optimization by integrating fast optimization techniques with machine-code-based, linear genetic programming
Frank D. Francone, Larry M. Deschaine
Inf. Sci.2