Dirk Deridder

dblp:63/3958 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 9Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Services computing and microservices · 50% Programming languages and type systems · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems
domain-specific languages
0.112009
Automating the Implementation of Analysis Concerns in Workflow Applications · ASE 2009
Services computing and microservices
workflow management
0.112009
Automating the Implementation of Analysis Concerns in Workflow Applications · ASE 2009
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Introduction to the SoSyM theme issue on models and evolution
Dalila Tamzalit, Bernhard Schätz, Alfonso Pierantonio, Dirk Deridder
Softw. Syst. Model.4
2013 Supporting multiple perspectives in feature-based configuration
Arnaud Hubaux, Patrick Heymans, Pierre-Yves Schobbens, Dirk Deridder, Ebrahim Khalil Abbasi
Softw. Syst. Model.4
2012 Realizing Model Transformation Chain interoperability
Andrés Yie, Rubby Casallas, Dirk Deridder, Dennis Wagelaar
Softw. Syst. Model.3
2011 Monitoring and Analysis Concerns in Workflow Applications: from Conceptual Specifications to Concrete Implementations
abstract
Workflow monitoring and analysis concerns aim at identifying potential improvements of workflow applications. This paper presents an approach to specify and implement monitoring and analysis concerns on workflow applications raising the level of abstraction for workflow analysts. First, the specification of monitoring and analysis concerns is declared in a technology-independent way with a domain-specific language named MonitA. MonitA makes extensive use of the data available in the workflow application and its constituents to enhance the monitoring and analysis specifications. Second, we defined and implemented a strategy to assist developers to enhance a given workflow technology to support the generation of the monitoring and analysis code and its composition with the workflow application. This instrumentation-based approach enables the monitoring and analysis of workflow applications during their operational execution. We illustrate the flexibility of our approach by targeting different workflow platforms and different workflow applications.
Oscar González Rojas, Rubby Casallas, Dirk Deridder
Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst.3
2010 Towards Multi-view Feature-Based Configuration
Arnaud Hubaux, Patrick Heymans, Pierre-Yves Schobbens, Dirk Deridder
REFSQ4
2010 Module superimposition: a composition technique for rule-based model transformation languages
Dennis Wagelaar, Ragnhild Van Der Straeten, Dirk Deridder
Softw. Syst. Model.3
2009 Automating the Implementation of Analysis Concerns in Workflow Applications
abstract
In workflow management systems, analysis concerns related to monitoring, measurement, and control aim at identifying potential improvements of workflow applications. However, the specification of analysis concerns is done using a specific workflow language and engine, producing entangled code which is detrimental to their maintainability. The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, it presents briefly a domain-specific language to specify analysis concerns, independently of any workflow technology and in a modularized way. Second, it shows a strategy to assist developers to enhance a given workflow technology to support the automated implementation of analysis concerns into its workflow applications. Thus, given a workflow application and its analysis concerns, they are automatically integrated producing an enhanced executable workflow application.
Oscar González Rojas, Rubby Casallas, Dirk Deridder
ASE3
2009 An Approach for Evolving Transformation Chains
Andrés Yie, Rubby Casallas, Dennis Wagelaar, Dirk Deridder
MoDELS4
2008 A Framework for Advanced Modularization and Data Flow in Workflow Systems
Niels Joncheere, Dirk Deridder, Ragnhild Van Der Straeten, Viviane Jonckers
ICSOC2
2007 DEUCE : Separating Concerns in User Interfaces
abstract
As current software systems evolve continuously, both the application and its user interface (UI) have to be adapted. However, UI code is often scattered through and entangled with the application code. In large and complex UIs, this tangling renders the implementation complex and hard to maintain. The Deuce framework (Declarative User Interface Concerns Extrication) intends to reduce the complexity of UI implementations by applying separation of concerns on three UI concerns: presentation logic, business and data logic, and connection logic. It does so by using a declarative meta-language (SOUL) on top of an object oriented language (Smalltalk) such that an adequate language is provided to describe the entire structure and behavior of the UI, as well as linking it with the application.
Sofie Goderis, Dirk Deridder, Ellen Van Paesschen
ICSEA2