Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Baoluo Li
dblp:63/4891
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 83% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 17% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Reinforcement Learning Based Temporal Logic Control with Maximum Probabilistic Satisfaction · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › learning-based motion planning
reinforcement learning-based motion planning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Reinforcement Learning Based Temporal Logic Control with Maximum Probabilistic Satisfaction · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Reinforcement Learning Based Temporal Logic Control with Maximum Probabilistic Satisfaction · ICRA 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic in computer science › logical foundations › non-classical logics › temporal logic
linear temporal logic |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Reinforcement Learning Based Temporal Logic Control with Maximum Probabilistic Satisfaction · ICRA 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic-based reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Reinforcement Learning Based Temporal Logic Control with Maximum Probabilistic Satisfaction · ICRA 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 0.5markov decision process · 0.5büchi automaton · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Reinforcement Learning Based Temporal Logic Control with Maximum Probabilistic SatisfactionabstractThis paper presents a model-free reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm to synthesize a control policy that maximizes the satisfaction probability of complex tasks, which are expressed by linear temporal logic (LTL) specifications. Due to the consideration of environment and motion uncertainties, we model the robot motion as a probabilistic labeled Markov decision process (PL-MDP) with unknown transition probabilities and probabilistic labeling functions. The LTL task specification is converted to a limit deterministic generalized Büchi automaton (LDGBA) with several accepting sets to maintain dense rewards during learning. The novelty of applying LDGBA is to construct an embedded LDGBA (E-LDGBA) by designing a synchronous tracking-frontier function, which enables the record of non-visited accepting sets of LDGBA at each round of the repeated visiting pattern, to overcome the difficulties of directly applying conventional LDGBA. With appropriate dependent reward and discount functions, rigorous analysis shows that any method, which optimizes the expected discount return of the RL-based approach, is guaranteed to find the optimal policy to maximize the satisfaction probability of the LTL specifications. A model-free RL-based motion planning strategy is developed to generate the optimal policy in this paper. The effectiveness of the RL-based control synthesis is demonstrated via simulation and experimental results. Mingyu Cai, Shaoping Xiao, Baoluo Li, Zhiliang Li, Zhen Kan |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2007 | An adaptive approach to selecting a flow-partition exponent for a multiple-flow-direction algorithmabstractMost multiple‐flow‐direction algorithms (MFDs) use a flow‐partition coefficient (exponent) to determine the fractions draining to all downslope neighbours. The commonly used MFD often employs a fixed exponent over an entire watershed. The fixed coefficient strategy cannot effectively model the impact of local terrain conditions on the dispersion of local flow. This paper addresses this problem based on the idea that dispersion of local flow varies over space due to the spatial variation of local terrain conditions. Thus, the flow‐partition exponent of an MFD should also vary over space. We present an adaptive approach for determining the flow‐partition exponent based on local topographic attribute which controls local flow partitioning. In our approach, the influence of local terrain on flow partition is modelled by a flow‐partition function which is based on local maximum downslope gradient (we refer to this approach as MFD based on maximum downslope gradient, MFD‐md for short). With this new approach, a steep terrain which induces a convergent flow condition can be modelled using a large value for the flow‐partition exponent. Similarly, a gentle terrain can be modelled using a small value for the flow‐partition exponent. MFD‐md is quantitatively evaluated using four types of mathematical surfaces and their theoretical ‘true’ value of Specific Catchment Area (SCA). The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) shows that the error of SCA computed by MFD‐md is lower than that of SCA computed by the widely used SFD and MFD algorithms. Application of the new approach using a real DEM of a watershed in Northeast China shows that the flow accumulation computed by MFD‐md is better adapted to terrain conditions based on visual judgement. Cheng-Zhi Qin 0001, A-Xing Zhu, Tao Pei, Baoluo Li, Chenghu Zhou, Lin Yang 0018 |
Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. | 4 |